Tree growth and soil relations at the 1925 Wind River spacing test in coast Douglas-fir

USDA Forest Service - Research Papers RMRS

Volumn , Issue 558, 2004, Pages 1-41

  Miller, Richard E ^a   Reukema, Donald L ^a   Anderson, Harry W ^a  

^a Forestry Sciences Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Available water capacity; Douglas fir; Site productivity; Soil depth; Stand yields; Tree size; Tree spacing

Indexed keywords

GROWTH RATE; SILVICULTURE; SOIL QUALITY; SOIL WATER; SPACING; YIELD;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES]; WIND RIVER EXPERIMENTAL FOREST;

ABIES; PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII VAR. MENZIESII;

EID: 2142668223     PISSN: 05025001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. nd ed. Physical and mineralogical methods. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy: 363-382.
2. Brackett, M. 1973. Notes on tariff tree volume computation. Resour. Manage, Rep. 24. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Natural Resources. 26 p.
3. Bremner, J.M. 1965. Total nitrogen. In: Black, C.A., ed. Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy: 1149-1178.
4. Bruce, D.; DeMars, D.J. 1974. Volume equations for second-growth Douglas-fir. Res. Note PNW-239. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 5 p.
5. Curtis, R.O. 1982. A simple index of stand density for Douglas-fir. Forest Science. 28: 92-94.
6. Curtis, R.O.; Reukema, D.L. 1970. Crown development and site estimates in a Douglas-fir plantation spacing test. Forest Science. 16: 287-301.
7. nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. 446 p. [Illustrated].
8. Eversole, K.R. 1995. Spacing tests in a Douglas-fir plantation. Forest Science. 1: 14-18.
9. Freese, F. 1974. Elementary statistical methods. Agric. Handb. 317. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 85 p.
10. Geist, J.M.; Cochran, P.H. 1991. Influences of volcanic ash and pumice deposition on productivity of western interior forest soils. In: Harvey, A.E.; Neuenschwander, L.F., comps. Proceedings-management and productivity of Western-montane forest soils. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-280. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 82-94.
11. Geist, J.M.; Strickler, G.S. 1978. Physical and chemical properties of some Blue Mountain soils in northeast Oregon. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-236. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 19 p.
12. Grewilling, T.; Peech, M. 1960. Chemical soil tests. Bull. 960. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Agriculture Experiment Station. [Pages unknown].
13. Haagen, E. 1990. Soil survey of Skamania County area, Washington. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 430 p. [Plus maps].
14. Isaac, L.A. 1937. 10 years' growth of Douglas-fir spacing-test plantations. Res. Note 23. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 6 p.
15. Lindbo, D.L.; Rhoton, F.E.; Bigham, J.M. [and others]. 1994. Bulk density and fragipan identification in loess soils of the Lower Mississippi Valley. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 58: 884-891.
16. Moeur, M. 1993. Characterizing spatial patterns of trees using stem-mapped data. Forest Science. 39: 756-775.
17. Rawls, W.J.; Pachepsky, Y. 2002. Soil consistence and structure as predictors of water retention. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 66: 1115-1126.
18. Reukema, D.L. 1979. Fifty-year development of Douglas-fir stands, planted at various spacings. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-253. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 21 p.
19. Smeck, N.E.; Ciolkosz, E.J., eds. 1989. Fragipans: their occurrence, classification, and genesis. SSSA Spec. Publ. No. 24. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America, Inc. 153 p.
20. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Soil Survey Center [NSSC]. 1995. Soil survey laboratory information manual. Soil Survey Investigations Rep. No. 45, version 1.0. Lincoln, NE: Soil Survey Laboratory. [Pages unknown].
21. U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Handb. 60. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 269 p.