Radiographic Examination of the Small Bowel: Survey of in Practice Patterns in the United States

Radiology

Volumn 231, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 407-412

  Ha, Alice S ^a   Levine, Marc S ^a   Rubesin, Stephen E ^a   Laufer, Igor ^a   Herlinger, Hans ^a  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Intestines, radiography; Radiologic Technologists; Radiology and radiologists

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; ILEUM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOGRAPHY; SMALL INTESTINE; UNITED STATES;

HUMANS; INTESTINE, SMALL; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2142661521     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2312030835     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Swain P. Enteroscopy. In: Yamada T, ed. Textbook of gastroenterology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999; 2695-2700.
2. Costamagna G, Shah SK, Riccioni ME, et al. A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2002; 123:999-1005.
3. Maglinte DD, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM, Rex D, Chernish SM. Small bowel radiography: how, when, and why? Radiology 1987; 163:297-305.
4. Maglinte DDT, Herlinger H. The small bowel follow-through and its modifications. In: Herlinger H, Malginte DDT, Birnbaum BA, eds. Clinical imaging of the small intestine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2001; 81-94.
5. Herlinger H. Barium examinations of the small bowel. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, eds. Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer, 1999; 81-94.
6. American College of Radiology. ACR practice guideline for the performance of per oral barium small bowel examination in adults. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2002; 167-169.
7. Gelfand DW, Ott DJ, Chen YM. Decreasing numbers of gastrointestinal studies: report of data from 69 radiologic practices. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148: 1133-1136.
8. Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 2000; 150-211.
9. Sapsford R. Survey research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 1999; 163-232.
10. Maglinte DD, Burney BT, Miller RE. Lesions missed on small-bowel follow-through: analysis and recommendations. Radiology 1982; 144:737-739.
11. Levine MS, Laufer I. The gastrointestinal tract: dos and don'ts of digital imaging. Radiology 1998; 207:311-316.
12. Kressel HY, Evers KA, Glick SN, et al. The peroral pneumocolon examination: technique and indications. Radiology 1982; 144:414-416.
13. Kelvin FM, Gedgaudas RK, Thompson WM, et al. The peroral pneumocolon examination: its role in evaluating the terminal ileum. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982; 139:115-121.
14. Toms AP, Barltrop A, Freeman AH. A prospective randomized study comparing enteroclysis with small bowel follow-through examinations in 244 patients. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1155-1160.
15. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50:1129-1136.
16. Phillips WC, Scott JA, Blasczcynski G. The significance of "no significance": what a negative statistical test really means. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 141:203-206.