Institutional Boundaries and Common-Pool Resource Management: A Comparative Analysis of Water Management Programs in California

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 97-117

  Heikkila, Tanya ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142660661     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.10181     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Blomquist, W. (1992). Dividing the waters: Governing groundwater in Southern California. San Francisco: ICS Press.
2. Blomquist, W., Heikkila, T., & Schlager, E. (2001). Institutions and conjunctive water management among three western states. Natural Resources Journal, 43(1), 653-683.
3. Bookman-Edmonston (1979). Water resources management in the southern San Joaquin Valley California: A study of the physical and institutional management practices for surface and ground water utilization. Glendale, CA: Bookman-Edmonston Engineering, Inc.
4. Case, P. J., & Alward, G. (1997). Patterns of demographic, economic and value change in the western United States: Implications for water use and management. Report to the Western Water Policy Review Advisory Commission. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
5. CDWR [California Department of Water Resources]. (1980). Groundwater basins in California: A report to the legislature in response to Water Code Section 12924, Bulletin 118-80. Sacramento, CA: CDWR.
6. CDWR [California Department of Water Resources]. (1994). California's ground water, Bulletin 118. Sacramento, CA: CDWR.
7. CDWR [California Department of Water Resources]. (1998a). California water plan update, Bulletin 160-98, vol. 1 and 2. Sacramento, CA: C DWR.
8. CDWR [California Department of Water Resources]. (1998b). Groundwater management in California, Bulletin 118-98. Sacramento, CA: CDWR.
9. Crawford, S. E. S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582-599.
10. Dzurik, A. A. (1990). Water resources planning. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
11. El-Ashry, M., & Gibbons, D. (1986). Troubled waters: New policies for managing water in the American West. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
12. Fisher, A., Fullerton, D., Hatch, N., & Reinelt, P. (1995). Alternatives for managing drought: A comparative cost analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 304-320.
13. Glennon, R., & Maddock, T. (1997). The concept of capture: The hydrology and law of stream/aquifer interactions. In 43rd Annual Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute (pp. 22-1-22-89). Denver, CO: Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation.
14. Gottlieb, R., & FitzSimmons, M. (1991). Thirst for growth: Water agencies as hidden government in California. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
15. Grigg, N. S. (1996). Water resources management: Principles, regulations, and cases. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Hauge, C. J. (1992). The importance of ground water in California. In Changing practices in ground water management - The pros and cons of regulation. Proceedings of the 18th Biennial Conference on Ground Water, Report No. 77 (pp. 15-30). Riverside, CA: University of California Water Resources Center.
17. Ingram, H. M., Mann, D. E., Weatherford, G. D., & Cortner, H. J. (1984). Guidelines for improved institutional analysis in water resources planning. Water Resources Research, 20(3), 323-334.
18. Kenney, D. S. (1997). Resource management at the watershed level: An assessment of the changing federal role in the emerging era of community-based watershed management, report to the Western Water Policy Review Advisory Commission. Boulder, CO: Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law.
19. Lam, W. F. (1998). Governing irrigation systems in Nepal: Institutions, infrastructure, and collective action. Oakland, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
20. Lord, W. B. (1984). Institutions and technology: Keys to better water management. Water Resources Bulletin, 20(5), 651-656.
21. Matthews, C. A. (1991). Using ground water basins as storage facilities in Southern California. Water Resources Bulletin, 27(5), 841-847.
22. MWDSC [Metropolitan Water District of Southern California] (1996). Southern California's integrated water resources plan, Report No. 1107. Los Angeles, CA: MWDSC.
23. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Oakerson, R. J. (1999). Governing local public economies: Creating the civic metropolis. Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
25. Oakerson, R. J., & Parks, R. B. (1988). Citizen voice and public entrepreneurship: The organizational dynamic of a complex metropolitan county. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 18, 91-112.
26. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Ostrom, E. (1998). Self-governance of common-pool resources. In P. Newman (Ed.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and law. London, UK: Macmillan.
28. Ostrom, E. (1999). Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 498-535.
29. Ostrom, E. (2000). The danger of self-evident truths. Political Science and Politics, 33(1), 33-44.
30. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, & common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
31. Ostrom, V. (1971). Institutional arrangements for water resource development, NWC 71-009, prepared for the National Water Commission. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
32. Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1991). Public goods and public choices: The emergence of public economies and industry structures. In V. Ostrom (Ed.), The meaning of American federalism (pp. 163-197). San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
33. Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1991). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. In V. Ostrom (Ed.), The meaning of American federalism (pp. 137-159). San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
34. Parks, R., & Oakerson, R. (1993). Comparative metropolitan organization and governance structures in St. Louis and Allegheny County. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 23(1), 19-39.
35. Purkey, D. R., Thomas, G. A., Fullerton, D. K., Moench, M., & Axelrad, L. (1998). Feasibility study of a maximal program of groundwater banking. Berkeley, CA: The Natural Heritage Institute.
36. Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
37. Reisner, M., & Bates, S. (1990). Overlapped oasis: Reform or revolution for western water. Washington, DC: Island Press.
38. Schlager, E. (1990). Model specification and policy analysis: The governance of coastal fisheries. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, Indiana University, Bloomington.
39. Tang, S. Y. (1992). Institutions and collective action: Self-governance in irrigation. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
40. Thorson, N. W. (1978). Storing water underground: What's the aqui-fer? Nebraska Law Review, 57(3), 581-632.
41. Todd, D. K., & Priestaf, I. (1997). Role of conjunctive use in groundwater management. Proceedings of the American Water Resources Association Conference, Symposium on Conjunctive Use of Water Resources: Aquifer Storage and Recovery (pp. 139-145). Long Beach, CA: American Water Resources Association.
42. Trelease, F. J. (1982). Conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water. Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute Journal, 27B, 1853+.
43. U.S. ACIR [U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations] (Ronald J. Oakerson, Principal Investigator). (1987). The organization of local public economies, A-109. Washington, DC: U.S. ACIR.
44. U.S. ACIR [U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations] (William Blomquist, Principal Investigator). (1991). Coordinating water resources in the federal system: The groundwater-surface water connection, A-118. Washington, DC: U.S. ACIR.
45. U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). State and county quick facts. Available at: 〈http://quickfacts.census.gov〉; accessed August 4, 2003.
46. USDA [U.S. Department of Agriculture]. (1999). 1997 Census of agriculture, AC97-A-51. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA.
47. WSWC [Western States Water Council]. (Anthony G. Willardson, Principal Investigator). (1990). Groundwater recharge projects in the western United States: Economic efficiency, financial feasibility, and legal/institutional issues, report to the Bureau of Reclamation and the Department of the Interior, Midvale, UT: WSWC.