Financial incentives and response rates in nursing research

Nursing Research

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 73-74

  Ulrich, Connie M ^a   Grady, Christine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPENSATION; EDITORIAL; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; NURSING; RESEARCH; ECONOMICS; NURSING RESEARCH; PATIENT SELECTION; REIMBURSEMENT;

HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; PATIENT SELECTION; REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE;

EID: 2142654328     PISSN: 00296562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006199-200403000-00001     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Asch, D.A, Jedrziewski, K., & Christakis, N.A. (1997). Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 1129-1136.
2. Dresser, R. (2001). Payments to research participants: The importance of context. American Journal of Bioethics, 1(2), 47.
3. Dickert, N., & Grady, C. (1999). What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. New England Journal of Medicine, 341(3), 198-203.
4. Halpern, S.D., & Asch, D.A. (2003). Commentary: Improving response rates to mailed surveys: What do we learn from randomized controlled trials? International Journal of Epidemiology, 32(4), 637-638.
5. Halpern, S.D., Ubel, P.A., Berlin, J.A., & Asch, D.A. (2002). Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires. Medical Care, 40, 834-839.
6. Lohr, S. (1999). Sampling: Design and analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.