The Impact of State Enterprise Zones on Urban Manufacturing Establishments

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 315-339

  Greenbaum, Robert T ^a   Engberg, John B ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142646381     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.20006     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Bartik, T.J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
2. Blair, J.P. (1995). Local economic development: Analysis and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
3. Boarnet, M.G., & Bogart, W.T. (1996). Enterprise zones and employment: Evidence from New Jersey. Journal of Urban Economics, 40, 198-215.
4. Bondonio, D., & Engberg, J. (2000). Enterprise zones and local employment: Evidence from the states' programs. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30, 519-549.
5. Council of Economic Advisors (U.S.) (1997). Economic report of the President transmitted to the Congress. Washington: Government Printing Office.
6. Davis, S.J., Haltiwanger, J.C., & Schuh, S. (1996). Job creation and destruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Dehejia, R.H., & Wahba, S. (1999). Applications and case studies - Causal effects in non-experimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 1053-1062.
8. Dowall, D.E. (1996). An evaluation of California's enterprise zone programs. Economic Development Quarterly, 10, 352-368.
9. Dunne, T., Roberts, M., & Samuelson, L. (1988). Patterns of firm entry and exit in the U.S. manufacturing industries. RAND Journal of Economics, 19, 495-515.
10. Dunne, T., Roberts, M., & Samuelson, L. (1989a). Plant turnover and gross employment flows in the U.S. manufacturing sector. Journal of Labor Economics, 7, 48-71.
11. Dunne, T., Roberts, M., & Samuelson, L. (1989b). The growth and failure of U.S. manufacturing plants. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 672-698.
12. Eberts, R.W., & Stone, J.A. (1992). Wage and employment adjustment in local labor markets. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
13. Elling, R.C., & Sheldon, A.W. (1991). Comparative analyses of state enterprise zone programs. In R.E. Green (Ed.), Enterprise zones (pp. 136-154). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Engberg, J., & Greenbaum, R. (1999a). State enterprise zones and local housing markets. Journal of Housing Research, 10, 163-187.
15. Engberg, J., & Greenbaum, R. (1999b). The impact of state enterprise zones on urban housing markets. H. John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management Working Paper No. 99-16. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
16. Erickson, R.A., & Friedman, S.W. (1990a). Enterprise zones: 1. Investment and job creation of state government programs in the United States of America. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 8, 251-267.
17. Erickson, R.A., & Friedman, S.W. (1990b). Enterprise zones: 2. A comparative analysis of zone performance and state government policies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 8, 363-378.
18. Friedlander, D., Greenberg, D.H., & Robins, P.K. (1997). Evaluating government training programs for the economically disadvantaged. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 1809-1855.
19. GAO [U.S. General Accounting Office] (1988). Enterprise Zones: Lessons from the Maryland Experience. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
20. Gort, M., & Klepper, S. (1982). Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Economic Journal, 92, 630-653.
21. Greenbaum, R. (1998). An evaluation of state enterprise zone policies: Measuring the impact on business decisions and housing market outcomes. Doctoral Dissertation. H. John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
22. Greenbaum, R., & Engberg, J. (2000). An evaluation of state enterprise zone policies. Policy Studies Review, 17, 29-46.
23. Greenbaum, R., & Engberg, J. (2002). An evaluation of state enterprise zone policies: Measuring the impact on urban housing market outcomes. In F.S. Redburn & T.F. Buss (Eds.), Public policies for distressed communities revisited (pp. 33-64). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
24. HUD [U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development] (1986). State-designated enterprise zones: Ten case studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
25. HUD [U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development] (1992). State Enterprise Zone Update: Summaries of the State Enterprise Zone Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
26. Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. Papke, L.E. (1993). What do we know about enterprise zones? In J.M. Poterba (Ed.), Tax policy and the economy (vol. 7, pp. 37-72). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Papke, L.E. (1994). Tax policy and urban development: Evidence from the Indiana enterprise zone program. Journal of Public Economics, 54, 37-49.
29. Papke, L.E. (2000). The Indiana enterprise zone revisited: Effects on capital investment and land values. National Tax Association, Proceedings of the 93rd Annual Conference, Santa Fe, NM (pp. 83-88). Washington, DC: National Tax Association.
30. Peters, A.H., & Fisher, P.S. (2002). State enterprise zone programs: Have they worked? Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
31. Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D.B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrica, 70, 41-55.
32. Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D.B. (1984). Reducing the bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 516-524.
33. Rubin, D.B. (1973). Matching to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics, 29, 159-183.
34. Rubin, D.B. (1979). Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias in observation studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 318-328.
35. Rubin, M. (1990). Urban enterprise zones: Do they work? Evidence from New Jersey. Public Budgeting and Finance, 10, 3-17.
36. State of Florida, Office of the Auditor General. (1993). Review and evaluation of the Enterprise Zone Program. Report No. 12003. (February 1).
37. Voith, R. (1996). The suburban housing market: The effects of city and suburban job growth. Business Review. (November/December), 13-25.
38. Wilder, M.G. & Rubin, B.M. (1996). Rhetoric versus reality: A review of studies on state enterprise zone programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62:473-491.