On the relation between power and reliability of difference scores

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 97, Issue 3 I, 2003, Pages 905-908

  May, Kim ^a   Hittner, James B ^a  

^a School of Business   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LIFE EVENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

HUMANS; LIFE CHANGE EVENTS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 2142644547     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.3.905     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. BEREITER, C. (1963) Some persisting dilemmas in the measurement of change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change. Madison, WI: Univer. of Wisconsin Press. Pp. 3-20.
2. COLLINS, L. M. (1996) Is reliability obsolete? A commentary on "Are simple gain scores obsolete?" Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 293-294.
3. COLLINS, L. M., & HORN, J. L. (Eds.) (1991) Best methods for the analysis of change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. CRONBACH, L. J., & FURBY, L. (1970) How should we measure change - or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68-80.
5. LORD, F. M., & NOVICK, M. R. (1968) Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. MELLENBURG, G. J. (1999) A note on simple gain score precision. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 87-89.
7. NICEWANDER, W. A., & PRICE, J. M. (1978) Dependent variable reliability and the power of significance tests. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 405-409.
8. NICEWANDER, W. A., & PRICE, J. M. (1983) Reliability of measurement and the power of statistical tests: some new results. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 524-533.
9. ROGOSA, D., BRANDT, D., & ZIMOWSKI, M. (1982) A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 726-748.