Mosaic displays for multi-way contingency tables

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 89, Issue 425, 1994, Pages 190-200

  Friendly, Michael ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Categorical data; Correspondence analysis; Graphical display; Log linear model; Marginal table

Indexed keywords

EID: 21344498942     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: 1537274X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1994.10476460     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Agresti, A. (1990), Categorical Data Analysis, New York: Wiley-Interscience.
2. Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of Graphics (trans. W. Berg). Madison. WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Deming, W. E., and Stephan, F. F. (1940). “On a Least Squares Adjustment of a Sampled Frequency Table When the Expected Marginal Totals are Known.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 11, 427–444.
4. Fienberg, S. E. (1969), “Preliminary Graphical Analysis and Quasi-Independence for Two-Way Contingency Tables,” Applied Statistics, 18, 153–168.
5. —— (1980), The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data (2nd ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Friendly, M. (1991), SAS System for Statistical Graphics, Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
7. —— (1992a), “Graphical Methods for Categorical Data,” in SAS SUGl Proceedings, 17, 1367–1373.
8. —— (1992b), “User’s Guide for MOSAICS: A SAS/IML Program for Mosaic Displays,” Depart. of Psychology Reports, No. 206, York University.
9. Friendly, M., and Fox, J. (1991), “Interpreting Higher-Order Interactions in Log-Linear Analysis: A Picture is Worth 1, 000 Numbers,” Working Paper ISBN 1–55014-157–0, York University, Institute for Social Research.
10. Gilbert, G. N. (1981), Modelling Society: An Introduction to Log-Linear Analysis for Social Researchers, London: Allen & Unwin.
11. Goodman, L. A. (1970), “The Multivariate Analysis of Qualitative Data: Interactions Among Multiple Classifications,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 226–256.
12. —— (1971), “Partitioning of Chi-Square, Analysis of Marginal Contingency Tables, and Estimation of Expected Frequencies in Multidimensional Contingency Tables,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 339–344.
13. —— (1973), “The Analysis of Multidimensional Contingency Tables When Some Variables are Posterior to Others: A Modified Path Analysis Approach,” Biometrika, 60, 179–192.
14. —— (1979), “Simple Models for the Analysis of Association in Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 537–552.
15. Greenacre, M. (1984), Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis, London: Academic Press.
16. Greenacre, M., and Hastie, T. (1987), “The Geometric Interpretation of Correspondence Analysis,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 437–447.
17. Haberman, S. J. (1973), “The Analysis of Residuals in Cross-Classified Tables,” Biometrics, 29, 205–220.
18. —— (1978), Analysis of Qualitative Data, New York: Academic Press.
19. Hartigan, J. A., and Kleiner, B. (1981), “Mosaics for Contingency Tables,” Computer Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on the Interface, ed. W. F. Eddy, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 268–273.
20. —— (1984), “A Mosaic of Television Ratings,” The American Statistician, 38, 32–35.
21. Heijden, P. G. M. van der, and de Leeuw, J. (1985), “Correspondence Analysis Used Complementary to Log-Linear Analysis,” Psychometrika, 50, 429–447.
22. Heuer, J. (1979), Selbstmord bei Kinder und Jugendlichen [Suicide by Children and Youth], Stuttgard: Ernst Klett Verlag.
23. SAS Institute (1989), SAS/IML Software: Usage and Reference, Version 6, First Edition, Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute.
24. Snee, R. D. (1974), “Graphical Display of Two-Way Contingency Tables,” The American Statistician, 28, 9–12.
25. Thornes, B., and Collard, J., (1979), Who Divorces?, London: Routledge & Kegan.
26. Wang, C. M. (1985), “Applications and Computing of Mosaics,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 3, 89–97.