The Problems of Learning to Think Like a Historian: Writing History in the Culture of the Classroom

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 89-96

  Greene, Stuart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21344488407     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: 15326985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep2902_4     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ackerman, J. M. (1990). Translating context into action. In L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, P. Kantz, K. McCormick, & W. Peck (Eds.), Reading to write: Exploring a cognitive and social process (pp. 173193). New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Ackerman, J. M. (1991). Reading, writing, and knowing: The role of disciplinary knowledge in comprehension and composing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 133–178.
3. Applebee, A. (1984). Contexts for learning to write. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. Chase, W., & Simon, H. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.
5. Chi, M., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
6. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53, 159–199.
7. Flower, L. (1990a). Negotiating academic discourse. In L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, P. Kantz, K. McCormick, & W. Peck (Eds.), Reading to write: Exploring a cognitive and social process (pp. 221–252). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Flower, L. (1990b). The role of task representation in reading-to-write. In L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, P. Kantz, K. McCormick, & W. Peck (Eds.), Reading to write: Exploring a cognitive and social process (pp. 35–75). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Flower, L., & Greene, S. (in press). Sociocognitive theories of writing. In A. Purves (Ed.), Encyclopedia of English studies and language arts. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
10. Flower, L., Stein, V., Ackerman, J., Kantz, P., McCormick, K., & Peck, W. (Eds.). (1990). Reading to write: Exploring a cognitive and social process. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Gagnon, P., & The Bradley Commission on History in Schools. (Eds.). (1989). Historical literacy: The case for history in American education. New York: Macmillan.
12. Glaser, R. (1986). On the nature of expertise. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Proceedings of the In memoriam: Hermann Ebbinghaus Symposium (pp. 915–928). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland.
13. Greene, S. (1993). The role of task in the development of academic thinking through reading and writing in a college history course. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 46–75.
14. Greene, S. (in press). Students as authors in the study of history. In G. Leinhardt & I. Beck (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Herrington, A. (1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331–359.
16. Hogan, M. (1987). The Marshall Plan: America, Britain and the reconstruction of Western Europe, 1947–1952. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Ilgen, T. (1985). Autonomy and interdependence: Western European monetary and trade relations, 1958–1984. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenhead.
18. Kellner, H. (1989). Language and historical representation: Getting the story crooked. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
19. LaCapra, D. (1985). History and criticism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
20. Larkin, J. H. (1985). Understanding, problem representations, and skill in physics. In S. Chipman, J. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (pp. 141–160). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Lesgold, A. M. (1984). Acquiring expertise. In J. R. Anderson & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.) Tutorials in learning in memory: Essays in honor of Gordon Bower (pp. 31–60). San Francisco: Freeman.
22. Megill, A., & McCloskey, D. (1987). The rhetoric of history. In J. Nelson, A. Megill, & D. McCloskey (Eds.), The rhetoric of the human sciences (pp. 221–238). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
23. Milward, A. (1984). The reconstruction of Western Europe, 1945–1951. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
24. Nelson, J. (1990). This was an easy assignment: Examining how students interpret academic writing tasks. Research in the Teaching of English, 24,362-396.
25. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Penrose, A. (1993). Writing and learning: Exploring the consequences of task interpretation. In A. Penrose & B. Sitko (Eds.), Hearing ourselves think: Process research in the writing classroom (pp. 52–69). New York: Oxford University Press.
27. President's Committee on Foreign Aid. (1947). The Harriman report: A report on European and American aid. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
28. Reitman, W. (1965). Cognition and thought. New York: Wiley.
29. Rowe, D. W. (1987). Literacy learning as an intertextual process. In J. E. Readance & R. S. Baldwin (Eds.), Research in literacy: Merging perspectives (pp. 101–112). Thirty-sixth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Chicago: National Reading Conference.
30. Spivey, N. N. (1990). Transforming texts: Constructive processes in reading and writing. Written Communication, 7, 256–287.
31. Spivey, N. N., & King, J. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 1–14.
32. Stanford, M. (1986). The nature of historical knowledge. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
33. Stone, L. (1979). The revival of narrative: Reflections on a new old history. Past and Present, 85, 3–24.
34. U.S. Economic Cooperation Administration. (1950). A report on recovery progress and United States aid. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
35. Voss, J. F., Greene, T., Post, T. R., & Penner, B. (1983). Problem-solving skill in the social sciences. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 165–213). New York: Academic.
36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language, (rev. ed., A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Walvoord, B. R, & McCarthy, L. P. (1990). Thinking and writing in college. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
39. Wexler, I. (1983). The Marshall Plan revisited: The European recovery program in economic perspective. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
40. White, H. (1987). The content of the form: Narrative discourse and historical representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
41. Wilson, S. M., & Sykes, G. (1989). Toward better teacher preparation and certification. In P. Gagnon & The Bradley Commission of History in Schools (Eds.), Historical literacy: The case for history in American education (pp. 268–286). New York: Macmillan.
42. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–87.
43. Wineburg, S. S., & Wilson, S. M. (1991). Subject matter knowledge in the teaching of history. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 2. Teachers’ subject matter knowledge and classroom instruction (pp. 305–347). Greenwich, CT: JAI.