The delphi study in field instruction revisited: Expert consensus on issues and research priorities

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1994, Pages 75-89

  Raskin, Miriam S ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21344487838     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: 21635811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10437797.1994.10672215     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abbott, A. A. (1986). The field placement contract: Its use in maintaining comparability between employment-related and traditional field placements. Journal of Social Work Education, 22(1), 57-66.
2. Bogo, M., & Power, R. (1992). New field instructors' perceptions of institutional supports for their roles. Journal of Social Work Education, 28(2), 178-189.
3. Dallcey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi Method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467.
4. Gelman, S. R. (1990). The crafting of field work training agreements. Journal of Social Work Education, 26(1), 6575.
5. Gelman, S. R., & Wardell, P. (1988). Who's responsible? The field liability dilemma. Journal of Social Work Education, 24(1), 70-78.
6. Gould, G. M. (1984). Developing industrial social work field placements. Journal of Social Work Education, 20(2), 3542.
7. Hartman, C, & Wills, R. M. (1991). The gatekeeping role in social work: A survey. In D. Schneck, B. Grossman, & U. Classman (Eds.), Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends (pp. 310-319). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
8. Lacerte, J., Ray, J., & Irwin, L. (1989). Recognizing the educational contributions of field instructors. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 3,99-113.
9. Marshack, E., & Glassman, U. (1991). Innovative models for field instruction: Departing from traditional methods. In D. Schneck, B. Grossman, & U. Glassman (Eds.), Fieldeduca-tion in social work: Contemporary issues and trends (pp. 84-95). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
10. Moore, L. S., & Urwin, C. A. (1990). Quality control in social work: The gatekeeping role in social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 4,113-128.
11. Moore, L. S., & Urwin, C. A. (1991). Gatekeeping: A model for screening baccalaureate students for field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 27,8-17.
12. Neugebogen, B. (1988). Field practica in social work administration: Tasks, auspice, selection criteria and outcomes. Journal of Social Work Education, 24(2), 151-158.
13. Raskin, M. (1983). A Delphi study in field instruction: Identification of issues and research priorities by experts. Arete, 8, 38-48.
14. Raskin, M. (Ed.). (1989). Empirical studies in field instruction. New York: Haworth Press.
15. Rogers, G., & McDonald, L. (1992). Thinking critically: An approach to field instructor training. Journal of Social Work Education, 28(2), 166-177.
16. Rosenfeld, D. J. (1989). Field instructor turnover. In M. S. Raskin (Ed.), Empirical studies in field instruction (pp.187-211). New York: Haworth Press.
17. Schneck, D„ Grossman, B., & Glassman, U. (Eds.). (1991).Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and (rends. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
18. Smith, H. Y., Faria, G., & Brownstein, C. (1986). Social work faculty in the role of liaison: A field study. Journal of Social Work Education, 22(3), 68-78.
19. Strom, K. (1991). Should field instructors be social workers? Journal of Social Work Education, 27(2), 187-195.
20. Tolson, E. R., & Kopp, J. (1988). The practicum: Clients, problems, interventions and influences on student practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 24(2), 123-134.
21. Walden, T., & Brown, L. N. (1985). The integration seminar: A vehicle for joining theory and practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 27(1), 13-19.
22. Watt, S., & Thomlison, B. (1980). Trends and issues in the field preparation of social work manpower: A summary report. Canadian Journal of Social Work Education, 6,131-158.