Reasoning with Three Types of Conditional: Biases and Mental Models

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 1993, Pages 653-677

  Ormerod, Thomas C ^a   Manktelow, Kenneth I ^b   Jones, Gregory V ^c  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21344482894     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: 14640740     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14640749308401032     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Braine, M.D.S. (1978). On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic. Psychological Review, 85, 1–21.
2. Bratko, I. (1990). PROLOG programming for artificial intelligence (2nd ed.). Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
3. Cheng, P.W., & Holyoak, K.J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391–416.
4. Evans, J.St.B.T. (1977). Linguistic factors in reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 297–306.
5. Evans, J.St.B.T. (1983). Linguistic determinants of bias in conditional reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 635–644.
6. Evans, J.St.B.T. (1989). Biases in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
7. Evans, J.St.B.T., & Beck, M.A. (1981). Directionality and temporal factors in conditional reasoning. Current Psychological Research. 1, 111–120.
8. Evans, J.St.B.T., & Newstead, S.E. (1977). Language and reasoning: A study of temporal factors. Cognition, 5, 265–283.
9. Fleiss, J.L. (1973). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
10. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models. London: Cambridge University Press.
11. Johnson-Laird, P.N., & Byrne, R.M.J. (1991). Deduction. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
12. Kirk, R.E. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioural sciences. Belmont. CA: Brookes/Cole.
13. Kowalski, R. (1982). Logic programming for the fifth generation. In K.L. Clark & S.-A. Tärnlund (Eds.), Logic programming. Amsterdam: North Holland.
14. Marascuilo, L.A., & McSweeney, M. (1977). Non-parametric and distribution-free methods for the social sciences. Belmont, CA: Brookes/Cole.
15. Ormerod, T.C., Manktelow, K.I., Robson, E.H., & Steward, A.P. (1986). Content and representation effects with reasoning tasks in PROLOG form. Behaviour and Information Technology, 5, 157–168.
16. Ormerod, T.C., Manktelow, K.I., Steward, A.P., & Robson, E.H. (1990). The effects of content and representation on transfer of PROLOG reasoning skills. In K. Gilhooly. M.T. Keane, R. Logie, & G. Erdos (Eds.), Lines of thinking: Rejections on the psychology of thought. Chichester: Wiley.
17. Reich, S.S., & Ruth, P. (1982). Wason's selection task: Verification, falsification and matching. British Journal of Psychology. 73, 395–405.
18. Rips, L.J., & Marcus, S.L. (1977). Suppositions and the analysis of conditional sentences. In M.A. Just & P.A. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdalc. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Ross, P. (1982). Teaching PROLOG to undergraduates. AlSB Qrturterly. 45, 16–17.
20. Wason, P.C. (1966). Reasoning. In B.M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology, Vol. 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
21. Wason, P.C., & Evans, J.St.B.T. (1975). Dual processes in reasoning? Cognition, 3, 141–154
22. Winer, B.J. (1970). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). London: McGraw-Hill.