Influence on mass-selective ion ejection of the phase difference between the drive r.f. and the axial modulation potentials

Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 714-721

  Dobson, G ^a   Murrell, J ^b   Despeyroux, D ^b   Wind, F ^c   Tabet, J C ^a  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b DEFENCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^c CENTRE D ETUDES DU BOUCHET   (France)

Author keywords

Axial modulation; Ion trap; Phase difference; Scan direction; Space charge

Indexed keywords

ELECTRODES; IONS;

AXIAL MODULATION POTENTIAL; ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION MASS SPECTRA; ION TRAP MASS SPECTROMETERS; MASS-SELECTIVE ION EJECTION;

MASS SPECTROMETERS;

ARTICLE; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY; ION TRAP MASS SPECTROMETRY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PHASE SEPARATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION;

EID: 21344473680     PISSN: 10765174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jms.843     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Stafford GC Jr, Kelly PE, Syka JEP, Reynolds WE, Todd JFJ. Recent improvements in and analytical applications of advanced ion trap technology. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1984; 60: 85.
2. Kelly PE, Stafford GC Jr, Stephens DR. US Patent 4 540 884, 1982.
3. Tucker DB, Hameister CH, Bradshaw SC, Hoekman DJ, Weber-Grabau M. In Proceedings of the 36th ASMS Conference Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, San Francisco, CA, 1988; 628.
4. Londry FA, March RE. Systematic factors affecting high mass-resolution and accurate mass assignment in a quadrupole ion trap. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 1995; 144: 87.
5. Julian RK, Reiser HP, Cooks RG. Large scale simulation of mass spectra recorded with a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1993; 123: 85.
6. Dobson G, Murrell J, Despeyroux D, Wind F, Tabet J-C. Investigations into the use of a reverse scan in a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003; 17: 1657.
7. Dobson G, Murrell J, Despeyroux D, Wind F, Tabet J.-C. An investigation into factors affecting precision in ion trap mass spectrometry using different scan directions and axial modulation potential amplitudes. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004; 39: 1657.
8. Wells JM, Plass WR, Cooks RG. Control of chemical mass shifts in the quadrupole ion trap through selection of resonance ejection working point and rf scan direction. Anal. Chem. 2000; 72: 2677.
9. Brancia FL, Giles R, Ding L. Effect of reverse scan on mass measurement accuracy in an ion trap mass spectrometer. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004; 39: 702.
10. Franzen J. The non linear ion trap. Part 5. Nature of non linear resonances and resonant ejection. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1994; 130: 15.
11. Wang Y, Franzen J. The non-linear ion trap. Part 3. Multipole components in three types of practical ion trap. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1994; 132: 155.
12. Voyksner RD, Lee H. Improvements in LC/electrospray ion trap mass spectrometry performance using an off-axis nebulizer. Anal. Chem. 1999; 71: 1441.
13. Fjeldsted J, Goodley PC, Kuhlmann FE, Schubert M. In Proceedings of the 36th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, San Francisco, CA, 1988.
14. Cooks RG, Rockwood AL. The 'Thomson'. A suggested unit for mass spectroscopists. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1991; 5: 93.
15. Reiser HP, Julian RK, Cooks RG. A versatile method of simulation of the operation of ion trap mass spectrometers. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1992; 121: 49.
16. Bui HA, Cooks RG. Windows version of the ion trap simulation program ITSIM: a powerful heuristic and predictive tool in ion trap mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 1998; 33: 297.