|
Volumn 28, Issue 9-10, 2005, Pages 973-981
|
Comparison of microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography and micellar electrokinetic chromatography methods for the analysis of phenolic compounds
|
Author keywords
MEEKC; MEKC; Phenolic acids; Phenolic compounds; Polyphenols
|
Indexed keywords
ACETONITRILE;
CARBOXYLIC ACIDS;
CHEMICAL MODIFICATION;
CHROMATOGRAPHY;
METHANOL;
MICELLES;
MICROEMULSIONS;
OPTIMIZATION;
REDUCTION;
SEPARATION;
MICELLAR ELECTROKINETIC CHROMATOGRAPHY (MEKC);
MICROEMULSION ELECTROKINETIC CHROMATOGRAPHY (MEEKC);
PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS;
SEPARATION EFFICIENCY;
PHENOLS;
ACETONITRILE;
BENZOIC ACID;
CAFFEIC ACID;
CATECHIN;
EPICATECHIN;
EPICATECHIN GALLATE;
EPIGALLOCATECHIN;
EPIGALLOCATECHIN GALLATE;
GALLIC ACID;
GALLOCATECHIN;
METHANOL;
PARA COUMARIC ACID;
PHENOL DERIVATIVE;
SYRINGIC ACID;
THEOPHYLLINE;
VANILLIC ACID;
ANALYTIC METHOD;
ARTICLE;
CHEMICAL STRUCTURE;
CONCENTRATION RESPONSE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
ELECTRIC POTENTIAL;
GRAPE;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MICELLAR ELECTROKINETIC CHROMATOGRAPHY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SEPARATION TECHNIQUE;
TEA;
TEMPERATURE;
CHROMATOGRAPHY, MICELLAR ELECTROKINETIC CAPILLARY;
EMULSIONS;
ORGANIC CHEMICALS;
PHENOLS;
SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE;
SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;
VITACEAE;
|
EID: 21344471143
PISSN: 16159306
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200400103 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (31)
|
References (40)
|