A diameter increment model for Crimean pine (Pinus nigra Arnold) and Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) stands in Isparta region, Turkey

Journal of Environmental Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 467-473

  Carus, Serdar ^a  

^a SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.); Competition index; Crimean pine (Pinus nigra Arnold); Diameter increment; Individual tree model

Indexed keywords

DIAMETER;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CANOPY; MODEL; NONHUMAN; PINE; PINUS BRUTIA; PINUS NIGRA; PLANT STEM; PLANTATION; SAMPLING; TREE; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; ISPARTA [TURKEY]; TURKEY; WORLD;

PINUS BRUTIA; PINUS NIGRA;

EID: 21344470420     PISSN: 02548704     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alemdaǧ, İ.Ş.: The growth, yield and management basis of the Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) stands of Turkey. Turkish For. Res. Inst. Tech. Bull. No: 11, Ankara. 160p. (1962). (In Turkish with English summary).
2. Alemdaǧ, İ.Ş.: Evaluation of some competition indexes for the construction of forest stand models and a new competition index. Rev. of Faculty of Forestry University of İstanbul, (28), 138-167 (1978). (In Turkish with English summary).
3. Anonymous.: Forestry of Turkish. planning organization of Government. Ankara, (2001) (In Turkish with English summary).
4. Atalay, İ.: General ecological properties of natural range areas of cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) forest and regioning of seed transfer of cedar in Turkey. Turkish For. Serv. Pub. No: 663/61, Ankara (1987). (In Turkish with English summary).
5. Bella, I.E.: A new competition model for individual trees. For. Sci., (17), 364-372 (1971).
6. Biging, G.S. and M. Dobbertin: Evaluation of competition indices in individual tree growth models. For. Sci., 41 (2), 360-377 (1995).
7. Daniels, F.R., H.E. Burkhart and T.R. Clason: A comparison of competition measures for predicting growth of loblolly pine trees. Can. J. For. Res., (16), 454-466 (1986).
8. Ek, A.R. and R.A. Monserud: Trials with program FOREST: Growth and reproduction for mixed species even or uneven-aged forest stands. pp. 56-73, (Ed: J. Fries) Res. Notes 30, Stockholm (1974).
9. Hegyi, F.: A simulation model for managing jack pine stand. 74-90p., (Ed: J. Fries). Royal Coll. For., Res. Notes 30, Stockholm (1974).
10. Kalipsiz, A.: Stand structure and yield studies of Crimean pine (Pinus nigra Arnold). Forest Service Pub. No: 349/8. İstanbul. pp. 141 (1963). (In Turkish with English summary).
11. Lorimer, C.G.: Test of age-independent competition indices for individual trees in natural hardwood stand. For. Ecol. Manage., (6), 343-360 (1983).
12. Munro, D.D.: Forest growth models a prognosis. pp. 7-21 (Ed.: J. Fries) Royal Coll. For., Res. Notes 30, Stockholm (1974).
13. Pukkala, T. and T. Kolström: Competition indices and the prediction of radial growth in Scots pine. Silva Fenn., (21), 55-67 (1987).
14. Sterba, H. and R.A. Monserud: Applicability of the forest stand growth simulator PROGNAUS for the Austrian part of the Bohemian Massif. Ecol. Model., (98), 23-34 (1997).
15. Tomé, M. and H.E. Burkhart: Distance dependent competition measures for predicting growth of individual tress. For. Sci., 35(3), 816-831 (1989).
16. Usta, H.Z.: The yield in Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) plantations studies. Turkish For. Res. Inst. Tech. Bull.No:219, Ankara pp. 138 (1991). (In Turkish with English summary).
17. Wykoff, W.R., N.L. Crookston and A.R. Stage.: User's guide to the stand prognosis model. USDA For. Serv. GTR, INT-133, pp. 112 (1982).