The calculus of coalitions cities, suburbs, and the metropolitan agenda

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 730-760

  Weir, Margaret ^a   Wolman, Harold ^b   Swanstrom, Todd ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cities; Coalitions; Regionalism; States; Suburbs

Indexed keywords

POLITICAL SYSTEM; URBAN POLITICS;

EID: 21344470354     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078087405276200     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allard, S., N. Burns, and G. Gamm. 1998. Representing urban interests: The local politics of state legislatures. Studies in American Political Development 12 (2): 267-302.
2. American Planning Association. 2002. Victory for planning reform in Illinois. Washington, DC: American Planning Association.
3. Baumgartner, F. R., and B. D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
4. Benjamin, G., and C. Brecher, eds. 1988. The two New Yorks: State-city relations in a changing federal system. New York: Russell Sage.
5. Broach, G. T. 1972. A comparative dimensional analysis of partisan and urban-rural voting in state legislatures. Journal of Politics 34:905-21.
6. Burns, N., L. Evans, G. Gamm, and C. McConnaughy. 2002. The local politics of state legislatures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April.
7. Burns, Nancy, and Gerald Gamm. 1997. Creatures of the state: State politics and local government, 1871-1921. Urban Affairs Review 33:59-96.
8. Chen, David W. 2002. Suburbs to the city: Drop the attitude. New York Times, 24 November.
9. Chernick, H., and A. Reschovsky. 2001. Lost in the balance: How state policies affect the fiscal health of cities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
10. Derge, D. 1958. Metropolitan and outstate alignments in Illinois and Missouri legislative delegations. American Political Science Review 52:1051-65.
11. Dickerson, Brian. Petty Engler kills Bill - And progress. Detroit Free Press, 3 January. Available from http://www.freep.com/news/ metro/dicker3_20030103.htm.
12. Doubek, M. 1997. Edgar's school funding plan looks like a "rip-off in the suburbs." Illinois Issues 23 (4): 41.
13. Dreier, P., J. Mollenkopf, and T. Swanstrom. 2005. Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century. Rev. ed. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
14. Fenton, J. H. 1966. Midwest politics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
15. Fiscal Policy Institute. 1994. The right choice for New York: A fair tax system for fiscal stability and growth. Albany, NY: Fiscal Policy Institute.
16. Fossett, J. W., and J. F. Giertz. 1989. Money, politics and regionalism: Allocating state funds in Illinois. In Diversity, conflict, and state politics: Regionalism in Illinois, edited by P. Nardulli, 222-46. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.
17. Gove, S. 1982. State impact: The Daley legacy. In After Daley: Chicago politics in transition, edited by S. K. Gove and L. H. Masotti, 203-16. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.
18. Greenstone, J. David. 1969. Labor in American politics. New York: Knopf.
19. Haberman, C. 2000. The gift that keeps hurting. New York Times, 26 July (late ed.), B1.
20. Hamilton, D. 2002. Regimes and regional governance: The case of Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs 24 (4): 403-23.
21. Henig, J. R. 2002. Equity and the future politics of growth. In Urban sprawl: Causes, consequences & policy responses, edited by G. D. Squires. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
22. Joens, D. A. 2000. Almanac of Illinois politics. Springfield, IL: Institute for Public Affairs.
23. Johnson, Elmer W. 1999. Chicago metropolis 2020. Chicago: Commercial Club of Chicago. Available from www.chicagometropolis2020.org.
24. Judd, Dennis R., and Todd Swanstrom. 2004. City politics: Private power and public policy. 4th ed. New York: Longman.
25. Kincaid, J. 1998. The devolution tortoise and the centralization hare. New England Economic Review May/June: 13-40.
26. Lindstrom, B., and E. Peterson. 2003. Politically institutionalized opposition: The Suburban O'Hare Commission and O'Hare expansion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, Cleveland, OH, March.
27. March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
28. McDermott, K., and L. Rogers. 1997. Gov. Edgar bitter over legislative losses. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 2 June, 4B.
29. Nardulli, P. F., ed. 1989. Diversity, conflict, and state politics: Regionalism in Illinois. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.
30. Orfield, M. 1997. Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
31. Orfield, M. 2002. American metropolitics: The new suburban reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
32. Pearson, R. 1997. What is Mike Madigan up to? Illinois Issues 23 (4): 12-17.
33. Reichley, A. J. 1970. The political containment of cities. In The states and the urban crisis, edited by A. K. Campbell. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34. Roy, Yancey. 2001. Influence business booming. Albany Times Union, 29 April.
35. Rusk, D. 1999. Inside game/outside game: Winning strategies for saving urban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
36. Shefter, M. 1985. Political crisis/fiscal crisis: The collapse and revival of New York City. New York: Basic Books.
37. Stonecash, J. 1998. Political parties and conflict. In New York politics and government: Competition and compassion, edited by S. Liebschutz. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press.
38. Taft, B. 2000. Ohio urban revitalization: Policy agenda and task force report. Columbus: State of Ohio.
39. Wallin, Bruce. 1998. From revenue sharing to deficit sharing: General revenue sharing and cities. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.