Firm size, small business presence and sales of innovative products: A micro-econometric analysis

Small Business Economics

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 189-201

  Brouwer, Erik ^b   Kleinknecht, Alfred ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21344468692     PISSN: 0921898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00388647     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch, 1993, 'Analyzing Innovation Output Indicators: The U.S. Experience', in A. Kleinknecht and D. Bain (eds.), New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement, London: Macmillan, pp. 10-41.
2. Amemiya, T., 1986, Advanced Econometrics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
3. Brouwer, E. and A. Kleinknecht, 1993, 'Technology and a Firm's Export Intensity: The Need for Adequate Innovation Measurement', Konjunkturpolitik 39, 215-325.
4. Brouwer, E. and A. Kleinknecht, 1994, Innovation in Dutch Manufacturing and Service Industries, 1992 (in Dutch), SEO Report to the Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague (published in the series: Beleidsstudies Technologie Economie, no. 27).
5. Budil-Nadvornikova, H. and A. Kleinknecht, 1993, The Regional Distribution of Product Innovations in the Netherlands (in Dutch), SEO report to the Ministry of Economic Affairs, published by the Department of Regional Policy (RBM), The Hague.
6. Dosi, G., 1988, 'Sources, Procedures and Micro-Economic Effects of Innovation'. Journal of Economic Literature 26, 1120-1171.
7. Feldman, M., 1994, The Geography of Innovation, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Geroski, P. A. and C. F. Walters, 1995, 'Innovative Activity over the Business Cycle', Economic Journal 105, 916-928.
9. Hughes, K., 1986, Exports and Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Judge, G. G., W. E. Griffiths, R. Carter Hill, H. Lütkepohl and T.-C. Lee, 1985, The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, New York: Wiley, 2nd Edition.
11. Kleinknecht, A. and B. Verspagen, 1990, 'Demand and Innovation: Schmookler Re-examined', Research Policy 19, 387-394.
12. Kleinknecht, A., T. P. Pool and J. O. N. Reijnen, 1991, 'Formal and Informal R&D and Firm Size: Survey Results from the Netherlands', in Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change. An International Comparison, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 84-108.
13. Kleinknecht, A. and D. Bain, eds., 1993, New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement, London: Macmillan, pp. 10-41.
14. Maddala, G. S., 1983, Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Manshanden, W., 1995, Commercial Services in a Regional Context (in Dutch), Ph.D. Thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam: Economisch-Geografisch Instituut.
16. Meyer-Krahmer, F., 1984, 'Recent Results in Measuring Innovation Output', Research Policy 13, 175-182.
17. Pavitt, K., 1984, 'Sectoral Patterns of Technological Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory', Research Policy 13, 343-373.
18. Prince, Y. M., 1994, Price-Cost Margins in Dutch Manufacturing, Ph.D. Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam (Tinbergen Institute Research Series).
19. Scherer, F. M., 1982, 'Demand-Pull and Technological Invention: Schmookler Revisited', Journal of Industrial Economics 30, 225-237.
20. Schmookler, J., 1966, Invention and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21. Teece, D., 1988, 'Technological Change and the Nature of the Firm', in G. Dosi et al. (ed.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter, pp. 256-281.
22. Walsh, V., 1984, 'Invention and Innovation in the Chemical Industry: Demand-Pull or Discovery-Push?', Research Policy 13, 211-234.
23. Windmeijer, F., 1992, Goodness of Fit in Linear and Qualitative-Choice Models, Ph.D. Thesis. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute Research Series.