The effect of water hydraulic permeability on the settling of a soft contact lens on the eye

Current Eye Research

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 329-336

  Monticelli, M V ^a   Chauhan, A ^b   Radke, Clayton J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

Darcy hydrodynamic permeability; Lens hydrodynamic squeeze through and squeeze out mechanisms; Rigid porous disk settling model; Soft contact lens binding

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; SILASTIC; SILICONE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BLINKING; CORNEA; EYE MOVEMENT; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROGEL; LENS; MEASUREMENT; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MODEL; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOFT CONTACT LENS; STEADY STATE; TEAR FILM; WATER HYDRAULIC PERMEABILITY; WATER PERMEABILITY;

BLINKING; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEA; EYELIDS; HUMANS; MICROFLUIDICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PERMEABILITY; PROSTHESIS FITTING; SILICONE ELASTOMERS; WATER;

EID: 21344466766     PISSN: 02713683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02713680590934085     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Miller KL, Lin M, Radke CJ, Polse KA. Tear mixing under soft contact lenses. In: Sweeney D. Silicone Hydrogels, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 2004: Chapter 3, 57-89.
2. Chauhan A, Radke CJ. Settling and deformation of a thin elastic shell onto a thin fluid layer overlying a solid surface. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2002;245:187-197.
3. López-Alemany A, Campañ V, Refojo MF. Porous structure of Purevision™ versus Focus Night&Day™ and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater). 2002;63:319-325.
4. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogel materials-how they work? In: Sweeny D. Silcone Hydrogels. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 2000: Chapter 1.
5. Nicolson PC, Baron RC, Charbrecek P, Court J, Domschke A, Griesser HJ, Ho A, Hopken J, Laycock B, Liu Q, Lohmann D, Meijs GF, Papaspiliotopoulos E, Riffle JS, Schindhelm K, Sweeney D, Terry WL, Vogt J, Winterton LC. Extended wear ophthalmic lens. US Patent 5965631; 1999.
6. Nicolson PC, Vogt J. Soft contact lens polymers: An evolution. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3273-3283.
7. Miller D. Pressure of the lid on the eye. Arch Ophtalmol. 1967;78:328-330.
8. Hayashi TT. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley; 1977.
9. Martin DK, Holden BA. Forces developed beneath hydrogel contact lenses due to squeeze pressure. Phys Med Biol. 1986;30:635-649.
10. Funkenbusch GMT, Benson RC. Centering mechanism for soft contact lenses. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME. 1999;121:188-195.
11. Taylor AJ, Wilson SDR. Centration mechanism of soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:215-221.
12. Chauhan A, Radke CJ. Modeling the vertical motion of a soft contact lens. Curr Eye Res. 2001;22:102-108.
13. Sabua AS, Raad PE. Blink-induced motion of a gas permeable contact lens. American Academy Optometry. 1995;72:378-386.
14. Greenkorn RA. Flowin Porous Media. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 1983: Chapter 1, 1-9.
15. Hedbys BO, Mishima S. Flow of water in the corneal stroma. Exp Eye Res. 1962;1:262-275.
16. Monticelli M. Senior Honors Research Report, University of California, Berkeley; 2004.
17. Refojo MF. Permeation of water through some hydrogels. J Appl Polym Sci. 1965;9:3417-3462.
18. Refojo MF. Permeation of water through some heterogeneous hydrophilic membranes. J Appl Polym Sci. 1966;11:185-190.
19. Fatt I. A predictive model for dehydration of a hydrogel contact lens in the eye. BCLA. 1989;12:15-31.
20. Fatt I. A new procedure for measuring water transport characteristic of dehydrating hydrogels-How this characteristic controls dehydration of the lens in the eye. ICLC. 1990;17;144-150.
21. Bird RB, Stewart W, Lightfoot EEN. Transport Phenomena, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002:63.
22. Denn MM. Process Fluid Dynamics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1988: Chapters 12, 13, 243-276.