A statewide survey of licensed clinical social workers' use of practice evaluation procedures

Research on Social Work Practice

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 27-39

  Gerdes, Karen E ^a   Edmonds, Rita M ^b   Haslam, Darryl R ^c   McCartney, Trina L ^c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Aspen Counseling ^*  (United States)

^c BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21344463834     PISSN: 10497315     EISSN: 15527581     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104973159600600102     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bloom, M., & Block, R. (1977). Evaluating one's own effectiveness and efficiency Social Work, 22, 130-136.
2. Bloom, M., & Fischer, J. (1982). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. (1995). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Blythe, B. (1992). Should undergraduate and graduate social work students be taught to conduct empirically based practice?Yes! Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 260-263.
5. Blythe, B.J. (1983). An examination of practice evaluation among social workers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
6. Briar, S. (1979). Incorporating research into education for clinical practice in social work: Toward a clinical science in social work In A. Rubin & A. Rosenblatt (Eds.), Sourcebook on research utilization (pp. 132-140). New York: Council on Social Work Education.
7. Elks, M.A., & Kirkhart, K.E. (1993). Evaluating effectiveness from the practitioner perspective Social Work, 38, 554-563.
8. Fischer, J. (1993). Empirically based practice: The end of ideology? Journal of Social Service Research, 18(1/2), 19-55.
9. Heineman-Pieper, M. (1994). Science not scientism: The robustness of naturalistic clinical research In W. Reid & E. Sherman (Eds.), Qualitative methods in social work practice research (pp. 71-88). New York: Columbia University Press.
10. Hersen, M., & Barlow, D.H. (1976). Single-case experimental designs. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
11. Hudson, W.W. (1982). The clinical measurement package. Chicago: Dorsey.
12. Jayaratne, S., & Levy, R.L. (1979). Empirical clinical practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
13. Nelsen, J.C. (1993). Testing practice wisdom: Another use for single-system research Journal of Social Service Research, 18(1/2), 65-81.
14. Penka, C.E., & Kirk, S.A. (1991). Practitioner involvement in clinical evaluation Social Work, 36, 513-518.
15. Richey, C.A., Blythe, B.J., & Berlin, S.B. (1987). Do social workers evaluate their practice? Social Work Research & Abstracts, 23, 14-20.
16. Rosenblatt, A. (1968). The practitioner's use and evaluation of research Social Work, 13, 53-59.
17. Specht, H. (1990). Social work and popular psychotherapies Social Service Review, 9, 354-357.
18. Tripodi, T. (1983). Evaluative researchfor social workers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Welch, G.J. (1983). Will graduates use single-subject designs to evaluate their casework practice? Journal of Education for Social Work, 19(2), 42-47.
20. Witkin, S.L. (1992). Should empirically based practice be taught in BSW and MSW programs?No! Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 265-268.