Volume estimation using the cavalieri principle on computerized tomography and magnetic resonance images and its clinical application: Review;Cavalieri prensibi kullanilarak bilgisayarli tomografi ve manyetik rezonans görüntüleri üzerinden hacim hesaplanmasi ve klinik kullanimi

Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 421-428

  Odaci, Ersan ^a   Bahadir, Ayşe ^a   Yildirim, Şiir ^a   Şahin, Bünyamin ^a   Canan, Sinan ^b   Baş, Orhan ^a   Bilgic, Sait ^a   Kaplan, Süleyman ^a  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Biometry; Magnetic resonance imaging; Tomography

Indexed keywords

BIOMETRY; CALCULATION; CAVALIERI PRINCIPLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATOR; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; STEREOLOGY; THEORY; TRAINING; VERTEBRA BODY; VOLUMETRY;

EID: 21344460931     PISSN: 13000292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Diab KM, Ollmar S, Sevastik JA, Willers U, Svensson A. Volumetric determination of normal and scoliotic vertebral bodies. Eur Spine J 1998;7:282-8.
2. Sahin B, Emirzeoglu M, Uzun A, et al. Unbiased estimation of the liver volume by the Cavalieri principle using magnetic resonance images. Eur J Radiol 2003;32:37-48.
3. Özden H, Ak G, Metintaş M, Metintaş S, Erginel S, Sahin B. Malign plevral mezotelyomada kemoterapi cevabinin deǧ erlendirilmesinde yeterlilik ve yeni bir ÿontem önerisi. Toraks Dergisi 2002;3(S):4-5.
4. Black KJ. On the efficiency of stereologic volumetry as commonly implemented for three-dimensional digital images. Psychiatry Res 1999;90:55-64.
5. Roberts N, Puddephat MJ, McNulty V. The benefit of stereoloji for quantitative radiology. Br J Radiol 2000; 73:679-97.
6. Glaser JR, Glaser EM. Stereology, morphometry, and mapping: The whole is greater than the sum of its parts. J Chem Neuroanat 2000;20:115-26.
7. Schenck JF. The role of susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996;23:815-50.
8. Verstraete KL, Lang P. Bone and soft tissue tumors: The role of contrast agents for MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 2000;34:229-46.
9. Webb J, Guimond A, Eldridge P, et al. Automatic detection of hippocampal atrophy on magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:1149-61.
10. Calmon G, Roberts N. Automatic measurement of changes in brain volume on consecutive 3D MR images by segmentation propagation. Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 18:439-53.
11. Iseda T, Goya T, Nakano T, Kodama T, Moriyama T, Wakisaka S. Serial changes in signal intensities of the adjacent discs on T2-weighted sagittal images after surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis: Anterior interbody fusion versus expansive laminoplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001;143:707-10.
12. Lang T, Augat P, Majumdar S, Ouyang X, Genant HK. Noninyasive assessment of bone density and structure using computed tomography and magnetic resonance. Bone 1998;22(S):149-53.
13. Cabello JR, Gonzalez BC, Avilés P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of inflammatory lesions in muscular and soft tissues: An experimental infection model induced by candida albicans. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:1327-34.
14. Ichikawa T, Araki T. Fast magnetic resonance imaging of liver. Eur J Radiol 1999;29:186-210.
15. Hatabu H, Chen Q, Stock KW, Gefter WB, Itoh H. Fast magnetic resonance imaging of the lung. Eur J Radiol 1999;29:114-32.
16. Goh S, Price RI, Leedman PJ, Singer KP. The relative influence of vertebral body and intervertebral disc shape on thoracic kyphosis. Clin Biomech 1999;14:439-48.
17. Schininà V, Rizzi EB, Rovighi L, Carli G, David V, Bibbolino C. Infectious spondylodiscitis: Magnetic resonance imaging in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients. Clin Imaging 2001;25:362-7.
18. Goh S, Price RI, Song S, Davis S, Singer KP. Magnetic resonance-based vertebral morphometry of the thoracic spine: Age, gender and level-specific influences. Clin Biomech 2000;15:417-25.
19. Howard CV, Reed MG. Unbiased Stereology: Three dimensional measurement in microscopy. Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishers; 1998. p.39-65.
20. Mazonakis M, Damilakis J, Varveris H. Bladder and rectum volume estimations using CT and stereology. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1998;22:195-201.
21. Liu C, Edwards S, Gong Q, Roberts N, Blumhardt LD. Three dimensional MRI estimates of brain and spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;66:323-30.
22. Vaithianathar L, Tench CR, Morgan PS, Lin X, Blumhardt LD. White matter T(1) relaxation time histograms and cerebral atrophy in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2002; 197:45-50.
23. Gundersen HJG, Jensen EB. The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. J Microsc 1987; 147:229-63.
24. Gundersen HJG, Jensen EBV, Kieu K, Nielsen J. The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology-reconsidered. J Microsc 1999;193:199-211.
25. West MJ. Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: Issues of precision and bias. Trends Neurosci 1999;22:51-61.
26. Canan S, Şahin B, Odaci E, et al. Toplam hacim, hacim yoǧunluǧu ve hacim oranlarinm hesaplanmasmda kullanilan bir stereolojik yöntem: Cavalieri prensibi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2002;22(S):7-14.
27. Canan S, Sahin B, Ünal B, Asian H, Bilgiç S, Kaplan S. Parçaciklann toplam sayisinm hesaplanmasi için bir metot: parçalama. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2002;22(S):30-46.
28. Hedreen JC. Unbiased stereology? Trends Neurosci 1999; 22:346-7.
29. Jörgen H, Gundersen G, Boysen M, Reith A. Comparison of semiautomatic digitizer-tablet and simple point counting performance in morphometry. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol 1981;37:317-25.
30. Schmitz C, Korr H, Heinsen H. Design-based counting techniques: The real problems. Trends Neurosci 1999;22: 345-6.
31. Mayhew TM, Olsen DR. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRJ) and model free estimates of brain volumes determined using the Cavalieri principle. J Anat 1991;178:133-44.
32. Pakkenberg B. Stereological quantitation of human brains from normal and schizophrenic individuals. Acta Neurol Scand 1992;137(S):20-33.
33. Mackay CE, Pakkenberg B, Roberts N. Comparison of compartment volumes estimated from MR images and Physical sections of formalin fixed cerebral hemispheres. Acta Stereol 1999;18:149-59.
34. Sahin B, Asian H, Unal B, et al. Brain volumes of the lamb, rat and bird do not show hemispheric asymmetry: A Stereological study. Image Anal Stereol 2001;20:9-13.
35. Mathieu O, Cruz-Orive LM, Hoppeler H, Weibel ER. Measuring error and sampling variation in stereology: Comparison of the efficiency of various methods of planar image analysis. J Microsc 1981;121:75-88.
36. Clatterbuck RE, Sipos EP. The efficient calculation of neurosurgically relevant volumes from computed tomographic scans using Cavalieri's direct estimator. Neurosurgery 1997;40:339-42.
37. Roberts N, Garden AS, Cruz-Orive LM, Whitehouse GH, Edwards RH. Estimation of fetal volume by magnetic resonance imaging and stereology. Br J Radiol 1994; 67:1067-77.
38. Pakkenberg B, Boesen J, Albeck M, Gjerris F. Unbiased an efficient estimation of total ventricular volume of the brain obtained from CT scans by a Stereological method. Neuroradiol 1989;31:413-7.
39. Roberts N, Cruz-Orive LM, Reid NMK, Brodie DA, Bourne M, Edwards RH. Unbiased estimation of human body composition by the Cavalieri method using magnetic resonance imaging. J Microsc 1993;171:239-53.
40. Xuea D, Albright Jr RE. Microcomputer-based technique for 3-D reconstruction and volume measurement of computed tomographic images. Comparison of geometric and planimetry post-operative tumor volume effects on patient survival. Comput Biol Med 1999;29:377-92.
41. Fargason RA, Jacques S, Rand RW, Shelden CH. A three-dimensional and volume determination of tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. Surg Neurol 1982;18:112-5.
42. Kretzschmar K, Schicketanz KH. Measurements of the volume and density of intracerebral tumors by CT following therapy. Neuroradiology 1982;23:175-84.
43. Albright Jr R, Fram EK. Microcomputer-based technique for 3-D reconstruction and volume measurement of computed tomographic images. Part 1: Phantom studies. Invest Radiol 1988;23:881-5.
44. Albright Jr R, Fram EK. Microcomputer-based technique for 3-D reconstruction and volume measurement of computed tomographic images. Part 2: Anaplastic primary brain tumors Part 2: Anaplastic primary brain tumors. Invest Radiol 1988;23:886-90.
45. Rosen GD, Harry JD. Brain volume estimation from serial section measurements: A comparison of methodologies. J Neurosci Methods 1990;35:115-24.