Survey of contact lens-wearing habits and attitudes toward methods of refractive correction: 2002 versus 2004

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 555-561

  Riley, Colleen ^a   Chalmers, Robin L ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Contact lens; Continuous wear; Extended wear; Incidence; Laser in situ keratomileusis; Orthokeratology

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; HEALTH; OPTOMETERS; REFRACTION; SURVEYING;

DEMOGRAPHY; LENS WEAR; REFRACTIVE CORRECTION;

LENSES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; AGING; ATTITUDE; CHI SQUARE TEST; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTACT LENS; COST; EXTENDED WEAR CONTACT LENS; FEMALE; GENDER; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORTHOKERATOLOGY; OVERNIGHT CONTACT LENS WEAR; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; REVIEW; SAFETY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPECTACLES; TIME; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONTACT LENSES; CONTACT LENSES, EXTENDED-WEAR; EYEGLASSES; FEMALE; HABITS; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 21344452985     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000167104.81142.40     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Riley C, Pence N. Forms of refractive correction: demographicfactors in patient attitudes and perceptions. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye 2005; in press.
2. Continuous-wear contact lenses approved. FDA Consum 2002;36:3. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/fdac/departs/2002/102_upd.html. Accessed March 15, 2005.
3. Tyler's Quarterly Soft Contact Lens Parameter Guide, 2002:19.
4. Vogt U. Kersley lecture: eye believe in contact lenses: contact lenses and/or refractive surgery. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:201-6.
5. Mendelblatt D, McCulley JP, Bowman RW, Verity S, Cavanagh HD. Effects of an educational seminar on rejection demographics in patients presenting for laser in situ keratomileusis. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:69-71.
6. Roghmann KJ, Hengst A, Zastowny TR. Satisfaction with medical care: its measurement and relation to utilization. Med Care 1979;17:461-79.
7. Hill JC. An informal satisfaction survey of 200 patients after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2002;18:454-9.
8. Duffey RJ, Leaming D. US trends in refractive surgery: 2001 International Society of Refractive Surgery Survey. J Refract Surg 2002;18:185-8.
9. The end of glasses? First came LASIK. Now there's a procedure for baby boomers who don't want to wear reading glasses. But does it work? Harv Health Lett 2004;29:5.
10. LASIK Eye Surgery. Learning about LASIK. Available at: www.fda.gov/cdrh/lasik. Accessed March 15, 2005.
11. Miranda D, Krueger RR. Monovision laser in situ keratomileusis for pre-presbyopic and presbyopic patients. J Refract Surg 2004;20:325-8.
12. Schlingemann RO, Nieuwendaal CP. [Eye problems due to contact lenses; an advisory report from the Health Council of The Netherlands]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2002;146:1616-9.
13. Schein OD, Glynn RJ, Poggio EC, Seddon JM, Kenyon KR. The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. A case-control study. Microbial Keratitis Study Group. N Engl J Med 1989;321:773-8.
14. Dart JK, Stapleton F, Minassian D. Contact lenses and other risk factors in microbial keratitis. Lancet 1991;338:650-3.
15. Schein OD, Buehler PO, Stamler JF, Verdier DD, Katz J. The impact of overnight wear on the risk of contact lens-associated ulcerative keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:186-90.
16. Lim L, Loughnan MS, Sullivan LJ. Microbial keratitis associated with extended wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:355-7.
17. Lee KY, Lim L. Pseudomonas keratitis associated with continuous wear silicone-hydrogel soft contact lens: a case report. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:255-7.
18. Whiting MA, Raynor MK, Morgan PB, Galloway P, Tole DM, Tullo A. Continuous wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses and microbial keratitis. Eye 2004;18:935-7.
19. Brennan NA, Coles ML, Comstock TL, Levy B. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1172-7.
20. Fonn D, Pritchard N, Dumbleton K. Factors affecting the success of silicone hydrogels. In: Sweeney D, ed. Silicone Hydrogel: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000:214-34.
21. Keay L, Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Skotnitsky C, Holden BA. Microcyst response to high Dk/t silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:582-5.
22. Papas EB. The role of hypoxia in the limbal vascular response to soft contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:572-4.
23. Rah MJ, Jackson JM, Jones LA, Marsden HJ, Bailey MD, Barr JT. Overnight orthokeratology: preliminary results of the Lenses and Overnight Orthokeratology (LOOK) study. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79: 598-605.
24. Walline JJ, Rah MJ, Jones LA. The Children's Overnight Orthokeratology Investigation (COOKI) pilot study. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81: 407-13.
25. Cheung SW, Cho P, Fan D. Asymmetrical increase in axial length in the two eyes of a monocular orthokeratology patient. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:653-6.
26. Garner LF, Owens H. The relationship between the sagitta of the anterior corneal surface and refractive error of the eye. Oprom Vis Sci 2004;81:636-9.
27. Young AL, Leung AT, Cheng LL, Law RW, Wong AK, Lam DS. Orthokeratology lens-related corneal ulcers in children: a case series. Ophthalmology 2004;111:590-5.
28. Lau LI, Wu CC, Lee SM, Hsu WM. Pseudomonas corneal ulcer related to overnight orthokeratology. Cornea 2003;22:262-4.
29. Xuguang S, Lin C, Yan Z, Zhiqun W, Ran L, Shiyun L, Xiuying J. Acanthamoeba keratitis as a complication of orthokeratology. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:1159-61.
30. Lang J, Rah MJ. Adverse corneal events associated with corneal reshaping: a case series. Eye Contact Lens 2004;30:231-3.