Retrospective analysis of casts to assess cervical headgear treatment in the presence of vertical growth pattern;Zervikaler Headgear bei vertikalem Wachstums-muster-eine Nachuntersuchung an Modellen

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 230-240

  Godt, Arnim ^a   Göz, Gernot ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Headgear; Molar distalization; Overbite; Retrospective study; Vertical growth pattern

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; DENTITION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALOCCLUSION; MAXILLA; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH DEVELOPMENT;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; EXTRAORAL TRACTION APPLIANCES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 21344447064     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-005-0433-4     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abbühl P. Die Wirkung des zervikalen Headgears auf das Fazialskelett. Eine klinische Studie. Inform Orthod 1976;4:327-46.
2. Armstrong MM. Controlling the magnitude, direction, and duration of extra oral force. Am J Orthod 1971;59:217-43.
3. Baumrind S, Molthen R, West EE, Miller DM. Mandibular plane changes during maxillary retraction. Am J Orthod 1978;74;32-40.
4. Baumrind S, Molthen R, West EE, Miller DM. Mandibular plane changes during maxillary retraction, Part 2. Am J Orthod 1978;74;603-20.
5. Baumrind S, Korn EL, Mothen R, West EE. Changes in facial dimensions associated with the use of forces to retract the maxilla. Am J Orthod 1981;80;17-30.
6. Baumrind S, Korn EL. Patterns of change in mandibular and facial shape associated with the use of forces to retract the maxilla. Am J Orthod 1981; 80;31-47.
7. Baumrind S, Korn EL, West EE. Prediction of mandibular rotation: An empirical test of clinician performance. Am J Orthod 1984; 86;371-85.
8. Baumrind S, Korn EL, Ben-Bassat Y, West EE. Quantitation of maxillary remodeling: 1. A discription of osseous changes relative to superimposition on metallic implants. Am J Orthod 1987;91;29-41.
9. Ben-Bassat Y, Baumrind S, Korn EL. Mandibular molar displacement secondary to the use of forces to retract the maxilla. Am J Orthod 1986; 89;1-12.
10. Barton JJ. High-pull headgear versus cervical traction: A cephalometric comparison. Am. J. Orthod 1972;62:517-29.
11. Blueher WA. Cephalometric analysis of treatment with cervical anchorage. Angle Orthod 1959;29:45-53.
12. Björk A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by implant method. J Dent Res 1963; 42;400-11.
13. Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969;55:585-99.
14. Björk A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption; an implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod 1972;62:339-83.
15. Boecler PR, Riolo ML, Keeling SD, TenHave TR.Skeletal changes associated with extraoral appliance therapy: An evaluation of 200 consecutively treated cases. Angle Orthod 1987;59:263-70.
16. Creekmore TD. Inhibition or stimulation of the vertical growth of the facial complex, its significance to treatment. Angle Orthod 1967;37:285-97.
17. Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships: Their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948;34:812-40.
18. Frislid G, Rakosi T. Analysen und Ergebnisse nach Headgearbehandlung. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1976;37:184-95.
19. Gould IE. Mechanical principles in extraoral anchorage. Am J Orthod 1957;43:319-33.
20. Greenspan RA. Reference charts for controlled extraoral force application to maxillary molars. Am J Orthod 1970;58:486-91.
21. Hanes RA. Bony profile changes resulting from cervical traction compared with those resulting from intermaxillary elastics. Am J Orthod 1959;45:353-64.
22. Hasund A. Klinische Kephalometrie für die Bergentechnik. Bergen, Norwegen: University of Bergen, 1976.
23. Hubbard GW, Nanda RS, Currier GF. A cephalometric evaluation of nonextraction cervical headgear treatment in Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1994;64:359-69.
24. Jacobsen A. Schlüssel zum Verständnis extraoraler Kräfte. Inform Orthod 1979;4:343-371
25. Kahl-Nieke B. Orthodontischer und kieferorthopädischer Headgear. Aus: Praxis der Zahnheilkunde Band 11/II, Kieferorthopädie II (Therapie), 4.Aufl. München: Urban&Fischer, 2000:247-70.
26. Kim KR, Muhl ZF. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment. Am J Orthod 2001;119:522-30.
27. King EW. Cervical anchorage in class II, division 1 treatment, a cephalometric appraisal. Angle Orthod 1957;27:98-103.
28. Klein PL. An evaluation of cervical traction on the maxilla and the upper first permanent molar. Angle Orthod 1957;27:61-8.
29. Kloehn SJ. Orthodontics - force or persuasion. Angle Orthod. 1953;23:56-60.
30. Kloehn SJ. Evaluation of cervical anchorage force in treatment. Angle Orthod 1961;31:91-104.
31. Kinast H. Zur Beeinflussung vertikaler Abweichungen mit Hilfe extraoraler und festsitzender Apparaturen. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1973;34:272-95.
32. Kubein D, Jäger A, Bormann V. Systematik der Distalisation oberer Sechser mit dem indirekten Headgear. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1984;45:128-40.
33. Kuhn RJ. Control of anterior vertical dimension and proper selection of extraoral anchorage. Angle Orthod 1968;38:340-9.
34. Lee RS, Daniel FJ, Swartz M, Baumrind S, Korn EL. Assessment of a method for the prediction of mandibular rotation. Am J Orthod 1987;91:395-402.
35. Meach CL. A cephalometric comparison of bony profile changes in Class II, Division 1 patients treated with extraoral force and functional jaw orthopedics. Am J Orthod 1966;52:353-70.
36. Merrifield LL, Cross JJ. Directional forces. Am J Orthod 1970;57:435-75.
37. Nauman SA, Behrents RG, Buschang PH. Vertical components of overbite change: A mathematical model. Am J Orthod 2000;117:486-95.
38. Nelson BG. Extra-oral anchorage in the treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusion - its possibilities and limitations. Angle Orthod 1953;23:121-133.
39. Newcomb M.R. Some observations on extraoral treatment. Angle Orthod 1958;28:131-48
40. Oosthuizen L, Dijkman JFP, Evans WG. A mechanical appraisal of the Kloehn extraoral assembly. Angle Orthod 1973;43:221-32.
41. O'Reilly MT, Nanda SK, Close J. Cervical and oblique headgear: A comparison of treatment effects. Am J Orthod 1993;103:504-9.
42. Poulton DR. Changes in Class II malocclusions with and without occipital headgear therapy. Angle Orthod 1959;29:234-49.
43. Posselt P, Uerdingen R. Der Headgear, theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung. 2. geänderte und erweiterte Aufl. Herne: Zahnärztlicher Fach-Verlag, 1985.
44. Rakosi T. Atlas und Anleitung zur praktischen Fernröntgenanalyse. München-Wien, Hanser: 1979.
45. Ricketts RM. The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development. Angle Orthod 1960;30:103-31.
46. Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Gugino CF, Hilgers JJ, Schulhof RJ. Bioprogressive therapy. Book I. Denver, CO: Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, 1979.
47. Ringenberg QM., Butts WC. A controlled cephalometric evaluation of single-arch cervical traction therapy. Am J Orthod 1970;57:179-88.
48. Rüsch JP, Stöckli PW. Differenzierte Anwendung extraoraler Kräfte in der Kieferorthopädie. Inform Orthod 1972;2:89-107.
49. Sander F. Zur Frage der Biomechanik des Aktivators. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1980.
50. Sandusky WC. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Kloehn type of cervical traction used as an auxiliary with the edgewise mechanism following Tweed's principles for correction of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1965;51:262-87.
51. Schopf P. Zur Prognose des vertikalen Wachstumstyps. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1982;43:271-81.
52. Silverstein A. Changes in the bony facial profile coincident with treatment of class II, division 1 (Angle) malocclusions. Angle Orthod 1954;24:214-37.
53. Skieller V, Björk A, Linde-Hansen T. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation evaluated from a longitudinal implant sample. Am J Orthod 1984; 86:359-70.
54. Teuscher U. Ein Konzept zur Behandlung der skelettalen Kl. II unter Berücksichtigung des Wachstums. Inform Orthod 1979;11:42-61.
55. Tweed CH. The frankfort-mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1954;24:121-69.
56. Ülgen M. Kephalometrische Untersuchung der Auswirkungen der Distalbißbehandlung mit dem Aktivator und dem Zervikalheadgear auf das Gesichtsskelett und deren Vergleich. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1981;42:337-48.
57. Wieslander L. The effect of force on craniofacial development. Am J Orthod 1974;65:531-37.
58. Wieslander L. The effect of orthodontic treatment on the concurrent development of the craniofacial complex. Am J Orthod 1963;49:15-27.
59. Williams JK, Cook PA, Isaacson KG, Thom AR. Extraorale Verankerung. In: Williams JK, Cook PA, Isaacson KG, Thom AR. Hrsg. Festsitzende kieferorthopädische Apparaturen. Stuttgart-New York: Georg Thieme, 2000.
60. Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM. A concept and classification of centers of rotation and extraoral force systems. Angle Orthod 1973;43:384-401.