Digital imaging of the optic nerve head: Monoscopic and stereoscopic analysis

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 89, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 879-884

  Morgan, J E ^a,b   Sheen, N J L ^b   North, R V ^b   Choong, Y ^a   Ansari, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIGITAL STEREOSCOPIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; MEASUREMENT; MONOSCOPIC ASSESSMENT; NEURORETINAL RIM WIDTH; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC DISK CUP; OPTIC DISK CUP TO OPTIC DISK RATIO; OPTIC NERVE; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STEREOMICROSCOPY; TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPTIC DISK; PHOTOGRAPHY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 21344444995     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.046169     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kamal DS, Viswanathan AC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Detection of optic disc change with the Heidelberg retina tomograph before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:290-4.
2. Lichter PR. Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1976;74:532-72.
3. Harper R, Reeves B, Smith G. Observer variability in optic disc assessment: implications for glaucoma shared care. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2000;20:265-73.
4. Weinreb R, Dreher A. Reproducibility and accuracy of topographic measurement of the optic nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. In: Nasemann H, Burk R, eds. Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and tomography. Munich: Quintessenz Verlags, 1990:177-82.
5. Dreher A, Reiter K. Retinal laser ellipsometry: a new method for measuring the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness distribution. Clin Vis Sci 1992;7:481-8.
6. Swanson EA, Izatt JA, Hee MR, et al. In vivo retinal imaging by optical coherence tomography. Optics Lett 1993;18:1864-6.
7. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath D, Hitchings R. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1557-63.
8. Caprioli J. Clinical evaluation of the optic nerve in glaucoma. Trans. Am Ophthalmol Soc 1994;XCII:590-641.
9. Jonas JB, Budde WM, Panda-Jonas S. Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. Surv Ophthalmol 1999;43:293-320.
10. Caprioli J. Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:153-9.
11. Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:140-5.
12. Gloster J, Parry DG. Use of photographs for measuring cupping in the optic disc. Br J Ophthalmol 1974;58:850-62.
13. Parkin B, Shuttleworth G, Costen M, et al. A comparison of stereoscopic and monoscopic evaluation of optic disc topography using a digital optic disc stereo camera. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:1347-51.
14. Yogesan K, Barry CJ, Jitskaia L, et al. Software for 3-D visualization/analysis of optic-disc images. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1999;18:43-9.
15. Eikelboom RH, Barry CJ, Jitskaia L, et al. Neuroretinal rim measurement error using PC-based stereo software. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2000;28:178-80.
16. Shuttleworth GN, Khong CH, Diamond JP. A new digital optic disc stereo camera: intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of optic disc measurements. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:403-7.
17. McGraw K, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods 1996;1:30-46.
18. Shrout P, Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 1979;86:420-8.
19. Bland M, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
20. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
21. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics. Ophthalmology 1988;95:350-6.
22. Varma R, Steinmann WC, Scott IU. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1992;99:215-21.
23. Britton RJ, Drance SM, Schulzer M, et al. The area of the neuroretinal rim of the optic nerve in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;103:497-504.
24. Garway-Hearti D, Ruben S, Viswanathan A, et al. Vertical cup/disc ratio in relation to optic disc size: its value in the assessment of the glaucoma suspect. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1118-24.
25. Garway-Hearti DF, Hitchings RA. Quantitative evaluation of the optic nerve head in early glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:352-61.
26. Harrad RA, McKee SP, Blake R, et al. Binocular rivalry disrupts stereopsis. Perception 1994;23:15-28.
27. Heijl A, Bengtsson B. Diagnosis of early glaucoma with flicker comparisons of serial disc photographs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;30:2376-84.
28. Berger JW, Patel TR, Shin DS, et al. Computerized stereochronoscopy and alternation flicker to detect optic nerve head contour change. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1316-20.
29. Boes D, Spaeth G, Mills R, et al. Relative optic cup depth assessments using three stereo photograph viewing methods. J Glaucoma 1996;5:9-14.