Love style perceptions in relation to personality function

Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 425-438

  Arnold, Margery E ^a   Thompson, Bruce ^a,b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21344435913     PISSN: 08861641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aron, A., & Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535-551.
2. Bailey, W., Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S.S. (1987). Relation of sex and genderrole to love, sexual attitudes, and self-esteem. Sex Roles, 16, 637-648.
3. Borrello, G.M., & Thompson, B. (1990a). An hierarchical analysis of the Hendrick-Hendrick measure of Lee's typology of love. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 327-342.
4. Borrello, G.M., & Thompson, B. (1990b). A note regarding the validity of Lee's typology of love. Journal of Psychology, 124, 639-644.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Finding out the meaning of true love. (1992, December 22). USA Today, p. D1.
7. Freud, S. (1924). On narcissism. In J. Rivier & J. Strachy (Eds.), Collected papers of Sigmund Freud (pp. 88-105). New York: International Psychoanalytic Press.
8. Gillaspy, A., Campbell, T., & Thompson, B. (1995, January). Concurrent validity of scores from the Hendrick-Hendrick Love Attitudes Scale: Predicting score variance using androgyny sex-roles data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Dallas. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 380 489)
9. Gillaspy, A., Campbell, T., & Thompson, B. (1996, January). Types of lovers: A Q-technique factor analysis of counselor person-factors defined by counselors' love attitudes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, New Orleans. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED forthcoming)
10. Gray, P. (1993, February 15). What is love? [Cover story]. Time, 141(7), pp. 46-49.
11. Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S.S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392-402.
12. Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S.S. (1989). Research on love: Does it measure up? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 784-794.
13. Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S.S. (1990). A relationship-specific version of the Love Attitudes Scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 239-254.
14. Hendrick, S.S., & Hendrick, C. (1987a). Love and sex attitudes: A close relationship. In W.H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 1, pp. 141-169). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
15. Hendrick, S.S., & Hendrick, C. (1987b). Love and sexual attitudes, self-disclosure and sensation seeking. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 281-297.
16. Hendrick, S.S., & Hendrick, C. (1992). Romantic love. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Lee, J.A. (1973). The colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Don Mills, Ontario: New Press. (Popular Edition, 1976)
18. Millon, T. (1987). Manual for the MCM-II (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.
19. Millon, T. (1990). The Millon Multiaxial Inventory-II. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.
20. Murthy, K., Rotzien, A., & Vacha-Haase, T. (1996). Second-order structure underlying the Hendrick-Hendrick Love Attitudes Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 108-121.
21. Rotzien, A., Vacha-Haase, T., Murthy, K., Davenport, D., & Thompson, B. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Hendrick-Hendrick Love Attitudes Scale: We may not yet have an acceptable model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1, 360-374.
22. Snyder, P. (1991). Three reasons why stepwise regression methods should not be used by researchers. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in educational research: Substantive findings, methodological developments (Vol. 1, pp. 99-105). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
23. Sternberg, R.J., & Grajek, S. (1984). The nature of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 312-329.
24. Thompson, B. (1989). Why won't stepwise methods die?. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 21, 145-148.
25. Thompson, B. (1995). Stepwise regression and stepwise discriminant analysis need not apply here: A guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 525-534.
26. Thompson, B., & Borrello, G.M. (1985). The importance of structure coefficients in regression research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 203-209.
27. Thompson, B., & Borrello, G.M. (1987). Concurrent validity of a love relationships scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 985-995.
28. Thompson, B., & Borrello, G.M. (1990, November). Measuring second-order factors using confirmatory methods: A case study example with the Hendrick-Hendrick love instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, New Orleans. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 325 527)
29. Thompson, B., & Borrello, G.M. (1992a). Different views of love: Deductive and inductive lines of inquiry. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 154-156.
30. Thompson, B., & Borrello, G.M. (1992b). Measuring second-order factors using confirmatory methods: An illustration with the Hendrick-Hendrick love instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 69-77.