Selected personality characteristics and attitudes toward feminism

Social Behavior and Personality

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 273-278

  Smith, Steven M ^a,b   De Man, Anton F ^c  

^a Department of Psychology ^*

^b Queens University

^c BISHOP'S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21344434519     PISSN: 03012212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.1996.24.3.273     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Banzinger, G., & Hooker, L. (1979). The effects of attitudes toward feminism and perceived feminism on physical attractiveness ratings. Sex Roles, 5, 437-442.
2. Beaman, A. L., & Klentz, B. (1983). The supposed physical attractiveness bias against supporters of the women's movement: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 544-550.
3. Beaman, A. L., Klentz, B., & Conrad, B. (1984). A direct test of and an alternative explanation for judgments of attractiveness of supporters of the women's movement. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 16, 191-195.
4. Devitt, M., & McKelvie, S. J., (1991). Effects of physical attractiveness on perceived support for women's rights. Social Behavior and Personality, 19, 151-156.
5. Duckitt, J. (1992). The social psychology of prejudice. New York: Praeger.
6. Goldberg, P. A., Gottesdiener, M., & Abramson, P. R. (1975). Another put-down of women? Perceived attractiveness as a function of support for the feminist movement. The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 113-115.
7. Johnson, R. W. (1981). Perceived physical attractiveness of supporters of Canada's political parties: Stereotypes or in-group bias? Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 13, 320-325.
8. Johnson, R. W., Dannenbring, G. L., Anderson, N. R., & Villa, R. E. (1983). How different cultural and geographic groups perceive the attractiveness of active and inactive feminists. The Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 111-117.
9. Johnson, R. W., Doiron, D., Brooks, G. P., & Dickinson, J. (1978). Perceived attractiveness as a function of support for the feminist movement: Not necessarily a put-down of women. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 10, 214-221.
10. Johnson, R. W., Holborn, S. W., & Turcotte, S. (1979). Perceived attractiveness as a function of active support for the feminist movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 227-230.
11. Kalin, R., & Tilby, P. J. (1978). Development and validation of a Sex-Role Ideology Scale. Psychological Reports, 42, 731-738.
12. Klentz, B., Beaman, A. L., Mapelli, S. D., & Ullrich, J. R. (1987). Perceived physical attractiveness of supporters and nonsupporters of the women's movement: An attitude-similarity-mediated error (ASME). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 513-523.
13. Lazarus, R. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. London: McGraw-Hill.
14. Levenson, H. (1981). Differentiating among internality, powerful others, and chance. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct (Vol. 1, pp. 15-63). New York: Academic Press.
15. Lottes, I. L., & Kuriloff, P. J. (1992). The effects of gender, race, religion, and political orientation on the sex role attitudes of college freshmen. Adolescence, 27, 675-688.
16. Mezydlo, L. S., & Betz, N. E. (1980). Perceptions of ideal sex roles as a function of sex and feminist orientation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 3, 282-285.
17. Novak, J., & Cole, D. (1978). Perceived attractiveness and support of the women's movement: Further findings. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, San Francisco.
18. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
19. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
20. Unger, R. K., Hilderbrand, M., & Madar, T. (1982). Physical attractiveness and assumptions about social deviance: Some sex-by-sex comparisons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 293-301.
21. Wilson, G. D. (1975). Manual for the Wilson-Patterson Attitude Inventory. Windsor: NFER Publishing.