Scenario-based stochastic programs: Resistance with respect to sample

Annals of Operations Research

Volumn 64, Issue , 1996, Pages 21-38

  Dupačová, Jitka ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Contamination technique; Expected value problems; Post optimality; Robust optimization; Sensitivity analysis; SLP with random recourse; Worst case analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 21344432070     PISSN: 02545330     EISSN: 15729338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02187639     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. J.R. Birge, The value of the stochastic solution in stochastic linear programs with fixed recourse, Mathematical Programming 24, 1982, 314-325.
2. W. Bühler, Capital budgeting under qualitative data information, in Capital Budgeting under Conditions of Uncertainty, R.L. Crum and F.G.J. Derkinderen, eds., M. Nijhoff, Boston, 1981, pp. 81-117.
3. R.S. Dembo, Scenario optimization, Annals of Operations Research 30, 1991, 63-80.
4. M.A.H. Dempster and A.M. Ireland, A financial expert decision system, in Mathematical Models for Decision Support, G. Mitra, ed., NATO ASI Ser. Vol. 48, Springer, Berlin, 1988, pp. 415-440.
5. J. Dupačová, Stability in stochastic programming with recourse. Contaminated distributions, Mathematical Programming Study 27, 1986, 133-144.
6. J. Dupačová, Stability and sensitivity analysis for stochastic programming, Annals of Operations Research 27, 1990, 115-142.
7. J. Dupačová, Postoptimality for multistage stochastic programs, Annals of Operations Research 56, 1995, 65-78.
8. J. Dupačová, Analysis of the expected value solution and the worst case analysis under relaxed convexity assumptions, Paper presented at Minisymposium on Stochastic Programming, Berlin, Jan. 22-23, 1994.
9. Yu. Ermoliev, Stochastic quasigradient methods and their application to systems optimization, Stochastics 9, 1983, 1-36.
10. E.G. Gol'shtein, Theory of Convex Programming, Translations of Mathematical Monographs 36, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1972.
11. B. Golub et al., A stochastic programming model for money management, RR 93-01-01, Hermes Laboratory, Wharton, Philadelphia, 1992; to appear in European Journal of Operations Research.
12. J. Gondzio and A. Ruszczyński, Sensitivity method for basis inverse representation in multistage stochastic linear programming problems, JOTA 74, 1992, 221-242.
13. F.R. Hampel, The influence curve and its role in robust estimation, Journal of the American Statistical Association 69, 1974, 383-397.
14. J.L. Higle and S. Sen, Stochastic decomposition: An algorithm for two-stage linear programs with recourse, Mathematics of Operations Research 16, 1991, 650-669.
15. A.J. King et al., Lake eurotrophication management: The Lake Balaton project, in Numerical Techniques of Stochastic Optimization, Yu. Ermoliev and R.J-B Wets, eds., Springer, Berlin, 1988, pp. 435-444.
16. A.J. King and D.J. Jensen, Linear-quadratic efficient frontiers for portfolio optimization, Appl. Stoch. Models Data Anal. 8, 1992, 195-208.
17. M.I. Kusy and W.T. Ziemba, A bank asset and liability management model, Operations Research 34, 1986, 356-376.
18. J.M. Mulvey, Robust optimization on PC supercomputers, SIAM News 26, 1993, No. 7.
19. J.M. Mulvey et al., Robust optimization of large scale systems, Operations Research 43, 1995, 264-281.
20. S.M. Robinson and R.J-B Wets, Stability in two-stage stochastic programming, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 25, 1987, 1409-1416.
21. J.K. Sengupta, Robust solutions in stochastic programming, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 42, 1991, 857-870.
22. R.J-B Wets, The aggregation principle in scenario analysis and stochastic optimization, in Algorithms and Model Formulations in Mathematical Programming, S.W. Wallace, ed., Springer, Berlin, 1989, pp. 91-113.
23. S.A. Zenios, Massively parallel computations for financial planning under uncertainty, in Very Large Scale Computing in the 21st Century, J. Mesirov, ed., SIAM, Philadelphia, 1991, pp. 273-294.