Two types of image generation: Evidence from PET

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 41-53

  Kosslyn, Stephen M ^a,b,c   Thompson, William L ^a   Sukel, Katherine E ^a   Alpert, Nathaniel M ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGERY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RETINA IMAGE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL MEMORY; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGINATION; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; RECALL; STATISTICS; VASCULARIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGINATION; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED;

EID: 21244500600     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/CABN.5.1.41     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. BRANDT, S. A., & STARK, L. W. (1997). Spontaneous eye movements during visual imagery reflect the content of the visual scene. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 27-38.
2. CHABRIS, C. F., & KOSSLYN, S. M. (1998). How do the cerebral hemispheres contribute to encoding spatial relations? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 8-14.
3. COSTIN, D. (1988). MacLab: A Macintosh system for psychology labs. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 197-200.
4. DENIS, M., & COCUDE, M. (1992). Structural properties of visual images constructed from poorly or well-structured verbal descriptions. Memory & Cognition, 20, 497-506.
5. FARAH, M. J. (1984). The neurological basis of mental imagery: Acomponential analysis. Cognition, 18, 245-272.
6. FARAH, M. J. (1986). The laterality of mental image generation: A test with normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 24, 541-551.
7. FIEZ, J. A., & PETERSEN, S. E. (1995). Neuroimaging studies of word reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 914-921.
8. FRISTON, K. J., FRITH, C. D., LIDDLE, P. F., & FRACKOWIAK, R. S. J. (1991). Comparing functional (PET) images: The assessment of significant change. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 11, 690-699.
9. FRISTON, K. J., HOLMES, A. P., WORSLEY, K. J., POLINE, J.-P., FRITH, C. D., & FRACKOWIAK, R. S. J. (1995). Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Human Brain Mapping, 189-210.
10. GRILL-SPECTOR, K. (2003). The neural basis of object perception. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 159-166.
11. HAXBY, J. V., GRADY, C. L., HORWITZ, B., UNGERLEIDER, L. G., MISHKIN, M., CARSON, R. E., HERSCOVITCH, P., SCHAPIRO, M. B., & RAPOPORT, S. I. (1991). Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88, 1621-1625.
12. HELLIGE, J. B., & MICHIMATA, C. (1989). Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information. Memory & Cognition, 17, 770-776.
13. JAGER, G., & POSTMA, A. (2003). On the hemispheric specialization of categorical and coordinate spatial relations: A review of the current evidence. Neuropsychologia, 41, 504-515.
14. JONIDES, J., & SMITH, E. E. (1994). Working memory in humans: Neuropsychological evidence. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1009-1020). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. JONIDES, J., SMITH, E. E., KOEPPE, R. A., AWH, E., MINOSHIMA, S., & MINTUN, M. A. (1993). Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET. Nature, 363, 623-625.
16. KOSSLYN, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 148-175.
17. KOSSLYN, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. KOSSLYN, S. M., ALPERT, N. M., THOMPSON, W. L., CHABRIS, C. F., RAUCH, S. L., & ANDERSON, A. K. (1994). Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints: A PET investigation. Brain, 117, 1055-1071.
19. KOSSLYN, S. M., BRUNN, J. L., CAVE, K. R., & WALLACH, R. W. (1984). Individual differences in visual imagery: A computational analysis. Cognition, 18, 195-243.
20. KOSSLYN, S. M., CAVE, C. B., PROVOST, D. A., & VON GIERKE, S. M. (1988). Sequential processes in image generation. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 319-343.
21. KOSSLYN, S. M., CHABRIS, C. F., MARSOLEK, C. M., & KOENIG, O. (1992). Categorical versus coordinate spatial representations: Computational analyses and computer simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 562-577.
22. KOSSLYN, S. M., HOLTZMAN, J. D., FARAH, M. J., & GAZZANIGA, M. S. (1985). A computational analysis of mental image generation: Evidence from functional dissociations in split-brain patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 311-341.
23. KOSSLYN, S. M., & KOENIG, O. (1995). Wet mind: The new cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed). New York: Free Press.
24. KOSSLYN, S. M., KOENIG, O., BARRETT, A., CAVE, C. B., TANG, J., & GABRIELI, J. D. E. (1989). Evidence for two types of spatial representations: Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 723-735.
25. KOSSLYN, S. M., MALJKOVIC, V., HAMILTON, S. E., HORWITZ, G., & THOMPSON, W. L. (1995). Two types of image generation: Evidence for left and right hemisphere processes. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1485-1510.
26. KOSSLYN, S. M., & THOMPSON, W. L. (2003). When is early visual cortex activated by visual mental imagery? Psychological Bulletin, 129, 723-746.
27. KOSSLYN, S. M., THOMPSON, W. L., & ALPERT, N. M. (1995). Identifying objects at different levels of hierarchy: A positron emission tomography study. Human Brain Mapping, 3, 107-132.
28. KOSSLYN, S. M., THOMPSON, W. L., & ALPERT, N. M. (1997). Neural systems shared by visual imagery and visual perception: A positron emission tomography study. NeuroImage, 6, 320-334.
29. KOSSLYN, S. M., THOMPSON, W. L., GITELMAN, D. R., & ALPERT, N. M. (1998). Neural systems that encode categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: PET investigations. Psychobiology, 26, 333-347.
30. KOSSLYN, S. M.,THOMPSON, W. L., SHEPHARD, J. M., GANIS, G., BELL, D., DANOVITCH, J., WITTENBERG, L. A., & ALPERT, N. M. (2004). Brain rCBF and performance in visual imagery tasks: Common and distinct processes. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 696-716.
31. KOSSLYN, S. M., THOMPSON, W. L., WRAGA, M., & ALPERT, N. M. (2001). Imagining rotation by endogenous versus exogenous forces: Distinct neural mechanisms. NeuroReport, 12, 2519-2525.
32. LAENG, B. (1994). Lateralization of categorical and coordinate spatial functions: A study of unilateral stroke patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 189-203.
33. LAENG, B., CHABRIS, C. F., & KOSSLYN, S. M. (2002). Asymmetries in encoding spatial relations. In K. Hugdahl & R. Davidson (Eds.), Brain asymmetry (2nd ed., pp. 303-339). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. LAENG, B., & TEODORESCU, D.-S. (2002). Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of the same visual scene. Cognitive Science, 26, 207-231.
35. LEY, R. G. (1979). Cerebral asymmetries, emotional experience, and imagery: Implication;; for psychotherapy. In A. A. Sheikh & J. T. Shaffer (Eds.), The potential of fantasy and imagination (pp. 41-65). New York: Brandon House.
36. LEVINE, D. N. (1982). Visual agnosia in monkey and man. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 629-670). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. MARINKOVIC, K. (2004). Spatiotemporal dynamics of word processing in the human cortex. Neuroscientist, 10, 142-152.
38. MCDERMOTT, K. B., PETERSEN, S. E., WATSON, J. M., & OJEMANN, J. G. (2003). A procedure for identifying regions preferentially activated by attention to semantic and phonological relations using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychologia, 41, 293-303.
39. MELLET, E., BRICOGNE, S., CRIVELLO, F., MAZOYER, B., DENIS, M., & TZOURIO-MAZOYER, N. (2002). Neural basis of mental scanning of a topographic representation built from a text. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1322-1330.
40. MELLET, E., TZOURIO, N., CRIVELLO, E, JOLIOT, M., DENIS, M., & MAZOYER, B. (1996). Functional anatomy of spatial mental imagery generated from verbal instructions. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 6504-6512.
41. MELLET, E., TZOURIO, N., DENIS, M., & MAZOYER, B. (1995). A positron emission tomography study of visual and mental spatial exploration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 433-445.
42. MESULAM, M.-M. (1981). A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 10, 309-325.
43. O'REGAN, J. K. (1992). Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.
44. O'REGAN, J. K., & NOË, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 939-1031.
45. PLONER, C. J., GAYMARD, B. M., RIVAUD-PECHOUX, S., BAULAC, M., CLEMENCEAU, S., SAMSON, S., & PIERROT-DESEILLIGNY, C. (2000). Lesions affecting the parahippocampal cortex yield spatial memory deficits in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1211-1216.
46. PODGORNY, P., & SHEPARD, R. N. (1978). Functional representations common to visual perception and imagination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Hitman Perception & Performance, 4, 21-35.
47. POSNER, M. I., & PETERSEN, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
48. ROTA KOPS, E., HERZOG, H., SCHMID, A., HOLTE, S., & FEINENDEGEN, L. E. (1990). Performance characteristics of an eight-ring whole body PET scanner. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 14, 437-445.
49. SERGENT, J. (1989). Image generation and processing of generated images in the cerebral hemispheres. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 170-178.
50. SERGENT, J. (1990). The neuropsychology of visual image generation: Data, method, and theory. Brain & Cognition, 13, 98-129.
51. SERGENT, J., OHTA, S., & MACDONALD, B. (1992). Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing: A positron emission tomography study. Brain, 115, 15-36.
52. SERGENT, J., ZUCK, E., LEVESQUE, M., & MACDONALD, B. (1992). Positron emission tomography study of letter and object processing: Empirical findings and methodological considerations. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 68-80.
53. SLOTNICK, S. D., MOO, L. R., TESORO, M. A., & HART, J. (2001). Hemispheric asymmetry in categorical versus coordinate visuospatial processing revealed by temporary cortical deactivation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 1088-1096.
54. SMITH, E. E., & JONIDES, J. (1998). Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 12061-12068.
55. SMITH, E. E., & JONIDES, J. (1999). Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science, 283, 1657-1661.
56. TALAIRACH, J., & TOURNOUX, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain (M. Rayport, Trans.). New York: Thieme.
57. TANAKA, K., SAITO, H., FUKADA, Y., & MORIYA, M. (1991). Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 66, 170-189.
58. THOMAS, N. J. T. (1999). Are theories of imagery theories of imagination? An active perception approach to conscious mental content. Cognitive Science, 23, 207-245.
59. THOMAS, N. J. T. (2002). The false dichotomy of imagery. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 25, 211.
60. THOMPSON, W. L., KOSSLYN, S. M., SUKEL, K. E., & ALPERT, N. M. (2001). Mental imagery of high- and low-resolution gratings activates area 17. NeuroImage, 14, 454-464.
61. TIPPETT, L. (1992). The generation of visual images: A review of neuropsychological research and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 415-432.
62. TULVING, E., KAPUR, S., CRAIK, F. I. M., MOSCOVITCH, M., & HOULE, S. (1994). Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: Positron emission tomography findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 2016-2020.
63. TURKELTAUB, P. E., EDEN, G. F., JONES, K. M., & ZEFFIRO, T. A. (2002). Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: Method and validation. NeuroImage, 16, 765-780.
64. UNGERLEIDER, L. G., & MISHKIN, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. WORSLEY, K. J., EVANS, A. C., MARRETT, S., & NEELIN, P. (1992). A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 12, 900-918.
66. WRAGA, M., THOMPSON, W. L., ALPERT, N. M., & KOSSLYN, S. M. (2003). Implicit transfer of motor strategies in mental rotation. Brain & Cognition, 52, 135-143.