Encoding location in aphasic and normal speech: The interaction of pragmatics with language output processing limitations

Aphasiology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 487-519

  Menn, Lise ^a   Gottfried, Michael ^b   Holland, Audrey L ^c   Garrett, Merrill F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL ERROR; APHASIA; ARTICLE; ATAXIC APHASIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONDUCTION APHASIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 21244495237     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687030444000912     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allan, K. (2000). Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Bates, E., Hamby, S., & Zurif, E. (1983). The effects of focal brain damage on pragmatic expression. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 59-84.
3. Benedet, M. J., Iglesias, S., & Utrilla, M. (2003). Adaptation theory and Spanish agrammatism: The optionality hypothesis. MS. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
4. Bihrle, A. M., Brownell, H. H., Powelson, J. A., & Gardner, H. (1986). Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Cognition, 5, 399-411.
5. Bloom, R. L., Borod, J. C., Obler, L. K., & Gerstman, L. J. (1993). Suppression and facilitation of pragmatic performance: Effects of emotional content on discourse following right and left brain damage. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 1227-1235.
6. Bored, J. C., Koff, E., Lorch, M. P., & Nicholas, M. (1985). Channels of emotional expression in patients with unilateral brain damage. Archives of Neurology, 42, 345-348.
7. Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.
8. Christiansen, J. A. (1995). Coherence violations and propositional usage in the narratives of fluent aphasics. Brain and Language, 21, 9-20.
9. Clark, E. (1973). Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition, 2, 161-182.
10. Friederici, A. D. (1985). Levels of processing and vocabulary type: Evidence from normal and agrammatic listeners. Cognition, 19, 133-166.
11. Friederici, A. D., Schoenle, P. W., & Garrett, M. F. (1982). Syntactically vs. semantically based computations: Processing of prepositions in agrammatism. Cortex, 18, 525-534.
12. Gardner, H., Brownell, H., Wapner, W., & Michelow, D. (1983). Missing the point: The role of the right hemisphere in the processing of complex linguistic materials. In E. Perecman (Ed.), Cognitive processing in the right hemisphere. New York: Academic Press.
13. Givon, T. (Ed.). (1983). Topic continuity and discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
14. Goodglass, H., & Menn, L. (1985). Is agrammatism a unitary phenomenon? In M-L. Kean (Ed.), Agrammatism (pp. 1-26). New York: Academic Press.
15. Halliwell, J. F. (2000). Korean agrammatic production. Aphasiology, 14, 1187-1204.
16. Huber, W. H., & Gleber, J. (1982). Linguistic and non-linguistic processing of narratives in aphasia. Brain and Language, 16, 1-18.
17. Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., Ska, B., & Nespoulous, J-L. (1986). Informative content of narrative discourse in right-brain-damaged right-handers. Brain and Language, 29, 217-248.
18. Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. (2003). The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: Training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 46, 773-787.
19. Kolk, H., & Heeschen, C. (1996). The malleability of agrammatic symptoms: A reply to Hesketh and Bishop. Aphasiology, 10, 81-96.
20. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Linebarger, M. C., Schwartz, M. F., & Saffran, E. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13, 361-392.
22. Menn, L. (2000). Studying the pragmatic microstructure of aphasic and normal speech: An experimental approach. In L. Menn & N. Bernstein Ratner (Eds.), Methods for studying language production. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
23. Menn, L., Kamio, A., Hayashi, M., Fujita, I., Sasanuma, S., & Boles, L. (1999). The role of empathy in sentence production: A functional analysis of aphasic and normal elicited narratives in Japanese and English. In A. Kamio & K. Takami (Eds.), Function and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
24. Menn. L., & Obler, L. K. (1990). Chapter 20, Conclusion: Cross-language data and theories of agrammatism. In L. Menn & L. K. Obler (Eds.), Agrammatic aphasia, Vol. II. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
25. Menn, L., Reilly, K. F., Hayashi, M., Kamio, A., Fujita, I., & Sasanuma, S. (1998). The interaction of preserved pragmatics and impaired syntax in Japanese and English aphasic speech. Brain and Language, 61, 183-225.
26. Miller, G., & Johnson-Laird, P. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Nilipour, R. (2000). Agrammatic language in Persian. Aphasiology, 14, 1205-1242.
28. Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L. P., Kiran, S., & Sobecks, J. (2003). The role of syntactic complexity in the treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: The complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE). Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 591-607.
29. Ulatowska, H. K., & Chapman, S. B. (1994). Discourse macrostructure in aphasia. In R. L. Bloom, L. K. Obler, & S. de Santis (Eds.), Discourse analyses and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
30. Ulatowska, H. K., Freedman-Stern, R., Doyel, A. W., Macaluso-Haynes, S., & North, A. J. (1983). Production of narrative discourse in aphasia. Brain and Language, 19, 317-334.