Genetic variation in remnant populations of Dalbergia nigra (Papilionoideae), an endangered tree from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

Annals of Botany

Volumn 95, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1171-1177

  Ribeiro, Renata Acácio ^a   Simões Ramos, Ana Carolina ^a   De Lemos Filho, José Pires ^a   Lovato, Maria Bernadete ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Allozymes; Anthropogenic disturbance; Brazilian Atlantic Forest; Brazilian rosewood; Conservation; Dalbergia nigra; Endangered tree species; Genetic variation; Habitat fragmentation

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION GENETICS; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIATION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; TREE;

ATLANTIC FOREST; SOUTH AMERICA; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

DALBERGIA; DALBERGIA NIGRA; PAPILIONOIDEAE;

ARTICLE; BRAZIL; DALBERGIA; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; TIME; TREE;

BRAZIL; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DALBERGIA; TIME FACTORS; TREES; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 21244491194     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci128     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alfenas AC. 1998. Eletroforese de Isoenzimas e Proteínas Afins: Fundamentos e Aplicações em Plantas e Microrganismos. Viçosa, Brazil: Editora da Universidade Federal de Viçosa.
2. Barrett SCH, Kohn JR. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE, eds. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. New York: Oxford University Press, 3-30.
3. Cardoso MA, Provan J, Powell W, Ferreira PCG, de Oliveira DE. 1998. High genetic differentiation among remnant populations of the endangered Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Leguminoseae-Caesalpinioideae). Molecular Ecology 7: 601-608.
4. Carvalho PER. 1994. Espécies Florestais Brasileiras: Recomendações Silviculturais, Potencialidades e Uso da Madeira. Brasília, Brazil: EMBRAPA-CNPF/SPI.
5. CITES. 1992. CITES: Appendices I, II and III to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Washington: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
6. Clayton JW, Tretiak DN. 1972. Amine-citrate buffers for pH control in starch gel electrophoresis. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 19: 1169-1172.
7. Coates DJ, Hamley VL. 1999. Genetic divergence and the mating system in the endangered and geographically restricted species, Lambertia orbifolia Gardner (Proteaceae). Heredity 83: 418-427.
8. Collevatti RG, Grattapaglia D, Hay JD. 2001. Population genetic structure of the endangered tropical tree species Caryocar brasiliense, based on variability at microsatellite loci. Molecular Ecology 10: 349-356.
9. Costa CMR, Herrmann G, Martins CS, Lins LV, Lamas IR. 1998. Biodiversidade em Minas Gerais: um atlas para sua conservação. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: Fundação Biodiversitas.
10. de Carvalho AM. 1997. A synopsis of the genus Dalbergia (Fabaceae: Dalbergieae) in Brazil. Brittonia 49: 87-109.
11. Foré SA, Hickey RJ, Vankat JL, Guttman SI, Shaefer RL. 1992. Genetic structure after forest fragmentation: a landscape ecology perspective on Acer saccharum. Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 1659-1668.
12. Frankel OH, Soulé ME. 1981. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Gibbs P, Sassaki R. 1998. Reproductive Biology of Dalbergia miscolobium Benth. (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) in SE Brazil: the effects of pistillate sorting on fruit-set. Annals of Botany 81: 735-740.
14. González-Astorga J, Castillo-Campos G. 2004. Genetic variability of the narrow endemic tree Antirhea aromatica Castillo-Campos & Lorence (Rubiaceae, Guettardeae) in a tropical forest of Mexico. Annals of Botany 93: 521-528.
15. Guo SW, Thompson EA. 1992. Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportions for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48: 361-372.
16. Haldane JBS. 1954. An exact test for randomness of mating. Journal of Genetics 52: 631-635.
17. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Weir BS, eds. Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resources. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 43-63.
18. Hartl DL, Clark AG. 1997. Principles of population genetics, 3rd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
19. IBAMA. 1992. Lista Oficial de Espécies da Flora Brasileira Ameaçadas de Extinção. Instituto Brasileiro de Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis, Secretaria de Meio Ambiente, Brazil.
20. IUCN. 1994. Red List Categories, IUCN Species Survival Commission. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
21. Kageyama PW, de Lacerda CMB, Gandara FB. 1999. 3° Relatório para o IPGRI em Relação ao Projeto de Pesquisa. Estratégias e Paramétros para Conservação Genética in situ de Florestas Tropicais no Brasil. São Paulo, Brazil: IPGRI, USP, CENARGEN.
22. Kephart SR. 1990. Starch gel electrophoresis of plant isozymes: a comparative analysis of techniques. American Journal of Botany 77: 693-712.
23. Leão AC, Vinha SG. 1975. Ocorrência do jacarandá no sul da Bahia. Cacau Atualidades, Ilhéus 12: 22-29.
24. López-Pujol J, Bosch M, Simon J, Blanché C. 2002. Allozyme diversity in the tetraploid endemic Thymus loscosii (Lamiaceae). Annals of Botany 93: 323-332.
25. Lorenzi H. 1992. Árvores Brasileiras. Manual de Identificação e Cultivo de Plantas Arbóreas Nativas do Brasil. São Paulo, Brazil: Plantarum Ltda, Nova Udessa.
26. Miller MP. 1997. Tools for populations genetic analyses (TFPGA) 1-3: a Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. Computer software distributed by author.
27. Milligan BG, Leebens-Mack J, Strand AE. 1994. Conservation genetics: beyond the maintenance of marker diversity. Molecular Ecology 3: 423-435.
28. Mohana GS, Uma Shaanser R, Ganeshaiah KN, Dayanandan S. 2001. Genetic relatedness among developing seeds and intra fruit seed abortion in Dalbergia sissoo (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 1181-1188.
29. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853-858.
30. Nei M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
31. Paschke M, Abs C, Schmid B. 2002. Relationship between population size, allozyme variation, and plant performance in the narrow endemic Cochlearia bavarica. Conservation Genetics 3: 131-144.
32. Polhill RM. 1981. Dalbergieae. In: Polhill RM, Raven PH, eds. Advances in legume systematics, Part 1. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 233-242.
33. Raymond M, Rousset F. 1995. GENEPOP: population genetics software for exact test and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248-249.
34. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5: 18-32.
35. Swofford DL, Selander RB. 1981. BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. Journal of Heredity 72: 281-283.
36. Taggart JB, McNally SF, Sharp PM. 1990. Genetic variability and differentiation among founder populations of the pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea L.) in Ireland. Heredity 64: 177-183.
37. Turner IM. 1996. Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence (Review). Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 200-209.
38. Turner IM, Corlett RT. 1996. The conservation value of small isolated fragments of lowland tropical rain forest. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 330-333.
39. Weir BS. 1990. Genetic data analysis. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
40. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
41. White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W. 1999. Genetic variation within a fragmented population of Swietenia humilis Zucc. Molecular Ecology 8: 1899-1909.
42. Workman PL, Niswander JD. 1970. Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local differentiation in the Papago. American Journal of Human Genetics 22: 24-29.
43. Wright S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.
44. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T. 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 413-418.
45. Young AG, Merrian HG, Warwick SI. 1993. The effects of forest fragmentation on genetic variation in Acer saccharum Marsh. (sugar maple) populations. Heredity 71: 277-289.