Solution interaction with the ocular surface: The significance in making the grade

Clinical and Refractive Optometry

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 134-142

  Snyder, Chris ^a,b,c  

^a Department of Optometry ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYE; FLUORESCEIN SODIUM; ROSE BENGAL;

APOPTOSIS; CONTACT LENS; CORNEA; EPITHELIUM CELL; EYE; GAS; GAS PERMEABILITY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HYDROGEL; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; REVIEW; SOFT CONTACT LENS; STAINING;

EID: 21244477947     PISSN: 17054850     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Norn MS. Vital staining of cornea and conjunctiva. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1962; 40: 389-401.
2. Feenstra RP, Tseng SC. Comparison of fluorescein and rose bengal staining. Ophthalmology 1992; 99(4): 605-17.
3. Norn MS. Micropunctate fluorescein vital staining of the cornea. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1970; 48(1): 108-118.
4. Norn MS. Vital staining of the cornea and conjunctiva; with a mixture of fluorescein and rose bengal. Am J Ophthalmol 1967; 64(6): 1078-1080.
5. Norn MS. Lissamine green. Vital staining of cornea and conjunctiva. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1973; 51(4): 483-491.
6. Justice J Jr, Soper JW. An improved method of viewing topical fluorescein. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1976; 81(5): 927-928.
7. Eliason JA, Maurice DM. Staining of the conjunctiva and conjunctival tear film. Br J Ophthalmol 1990; 74(9): 519-22.
8. Courtney RC, Lee JM. Predicting ocular intolerance of a contact lens solution by use of a filter system enhancing fluorescein staining detection. Int Contact Lens Clin 1982; 9: 302-310.
9. Schwallie JD, Mckenney CD, Long WD Jr, Mcneil A. Corneal staining patterns in normal non-contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74(2): 92-98.
10. Korb DR, Korb JM. Corneal staining prior to contact lens wearing. J Am Optom Assoc 1970; 41(3): 228-232.
11. Caffery BE, Josephson JE. Corneal staining after sequential instillations of fluorescein over 30 days. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68(6): 467-469.
12. Josephson JE, Caffery BE. Corneal staining characteristics after sequential instillations of fluorescein. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69(7): 570-573.
13. Dundas M, Walker A, Woods RL. Clinical grading of corneal staining of non-contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21(1): 30-35.
14. Snyder AC, Nash RW. Do asymptomatic soft contact lens patients require fluorescein evaluations during adaptation? Int Contact Lens Clin 1984; 11(11): 691-697.
15. Terry RL, Schnider CM, Holden BA, Cornish R, Grant T, Sweeney D, La Hood D, Back A. CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70(3): 234-243.
16. Josephson JE, Caffery BE. Corneal staining after instillation of topical anesthetic (SSII). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988; 29(7): 1096-1099.
17. Kikkawa Y. Normal corneal staining with fluorescein. Exp Eye Res 1972; 14(1): 13-20.
18. Pritchard N, Young G, Coleman S et al. Subjective and objective measures of corneal staining related to multi-
19. Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara G. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 79 (12): 753-761. purpose care systems. Contact Lens Ant Eye. 2003; 26: 3-9.
20. Begley CG, Edrington TB, Chalmers R. Effect of lens care systems on corneal fluorescein staining and subjective comfort in hydrogel lens wearers. Int Contact Lens Clin 1994; 21: 7-13.
21. Begley CG, Barr JT, Edrington TB, Long WD, McKenney CD, Chalmers RL. Characteristics of corneal staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73(3): 193-200.
22. Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Daily disposable vs. disposable extended wear: a contact lens clinical trial. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77(12): 637-647.
23. Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Simon KM, Chivers DA, Edrington TB. Corneal staining in hydrogel lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79(1): 20-30.
24. Chahine T, Weissman BA. Peripheral corneal furrow staining: a sign to discontinue hydrogel contact lens use? Int Contact Lens Clin 1996; 23(6): 229-232.
25. Holden BA, Stephenson A, Stretton S, Sankaridurg PR, O'Hare N, Jalbert I, Sweeney DF. Superior epithelial arcuate lesions with soft contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78(1): 9-12.
26. Efron N. Grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18(2): 182-186.
27. Efron N. Grading scales for contact lens complications. Appendix A. In: Contact Lens Complications, Second Edition. Butterworth-Heinemaim, Oxford 2004 pp. 239-243.
28. Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit. CCLRU grading scales. In: Phillips AG, Speedwell L, editors. Contact lenses. 4th ed. Oxford: Butterworth- Heinneman; 1997.
29. Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32(2): 422-32.
30. Efron N, Morgan PB, Katsara SS. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21(1): 17-29.
31. Amos C. A clinical comparison of two soft lens care systems used with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optician 2004; 5933(227): 16-20.
32. Jones L, Jones D, Houlford M. Clinical comparison of three polyhexanide-preserved multipurpose solutions. Contact Lens Ant Eye 1997; 20: 23-30.
33. Lebow KA, Schachet JL. Evaluation of corneal staining and patient preference with use of three multi-purpose solutions and two brands of soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29(4): 213-220.
34. Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. The characteristics of corneal staining in successful daily and extended disposable contact lens wearers. Clin Exp Optom 1999; 82(1): 4-10.
35. Lebow KA. Moving from one care system to MPDS: a study. Contact Lens Spectrum 2000; 15(4): 45-48.