Why economists disregard economic methodology

Journal of Economic Methodology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 41-47

  Frey, Bruno S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244476962     PISSN: 1350178X     EISSN: 14699427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13501780010022820     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Blaug, M. (1997) 'Ugly currents in economics. Facts or fiction?. Conference on Realism in Economics, Rotterdam, 14-15 November.
2. Ellison, G. (2000a) 'Evolving standards for academic publishing: A q-r Theory', NBER Working Paper No. W7805, July.
3. Ellison, G. (2000b) The slowdown of the economics publishing process', NBER Working Paper No. W7804, July.
4. Frey, B.S. and Eichenberger, R. (1992) 'Economics and economists: a European perspective', American Economic Review 82: 216-20.
5. Fery, B.S. and Eichenberger, R. (1997) 'Economists: first semester, high flyers, and UFOs', in P.A.G. van Bergeijk, A. Bovernberg, E.E.C. van Damme and J. van Sinderen (eds) Economic Science and Practice: The Roles of Academic Economists and Policy-makers, Cheltenham UK and Brook field USA: Edward Elgar: pp. 15-48.
6. Hahn, F. (1992) 'Reflections', Royal Economic Society Newsletter, April: 5.
7. Hargreaves Heap, S. (2000) 'Methodology now'. Journal of Economic Methodology 7: 95-108.
8. Mayer, T. (1993) Truth versus Precision in Economics, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
9. McCloskey, D. (1997) The Vices of Economists; The Virtues of the Bourgeoisie, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press and Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10. McCloskey, D. and Ziliak, S. (1996) 'The standard error of regression'. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 97-114.
11. Reder, M.W. (1999) Economics. The Culture of a Controversial Science, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.