Determination of pseudophakic accommodation with translation lenses using Purkinje image analysis

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 87-96

  Langenbucher, Achim ^a   Jakob, Christina ^a   Reese, Sven ^a   Seitz, Berthold ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accommodative IOL; Geometrical optics; Le Grand model eye; Pseudophakic accommodation; Purkinje image; Translation lenses

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMETRY; CORNEA; EYE REFRACTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; LENS; LENS IMPLANT; LIGHT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOPHAKIA; RETINA; VITREOUS BODY; HUMAN; MATHEMATICS; PHOTOGRAPHY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHOTOGRAPHY; PSEUDOPHAKIA;

EID: 21244467830     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00260.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bennett, A. G. and Rabbetts, R. B. (1998) Clinical Visual Optics, 3rd edn (ed. R. B. Rabbetts). Butterworth-Heinemann, Edinburgh, London, New York, pp. 217-220 and, pp. 398-400.
2. Blaker, J. W. (1971) Geometrical Optics: The Matrix Theory. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
3. Brouwer, W. (1964) Matrix Methods in Optical Instrument Design. WA Benjamin Inc., New York.
4. Haigis, W. (1995) Biometrie. In: Augenärztliche Untersuchungsmethoden, (eds W. Straub, P. Kroll and H. J. Küchle), Biermann, Cologne, Germany, pp. 255-304.
5. Keating, M. P. (1981) Lens effectivity in terms of dioptric power matrices. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 58, 1154-1160.
6. Klein, M. V. (1970) Optics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
7. Küchle, M., Gusek-Schneider, G. C., Langenbucher, A., Seitz, B. and Hanna, K. H. (2001) Erste Ergebnisse der Implantation einer neuen, potentiell akkommodierbaren Hinterkammerlinse. Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheilkd. 218, 603-608.
8. Küchle, M., Nguyen, N. X., Langenbucher, A., Gusek-Schneider, G. C., Seitz, B. and Hanna, K. D. (2002) Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens (1 CU). J. Refract. Surg. 8, 208-217.
9. Langenbucher, A., Huber, S., Nguyen, N. X., Seitz, B. and Küchle, M. (2003a) Cardinal points and object-image magnification with an accommodative lens implant (1 CU). Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 23, 61-70.
10. Langenbucher, A., Huber, S., Nguyen, N. X., Seitz, B. and Küchle, M. (2003b) Measurement of accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber lens (1 CU). J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 29, 677-685.
11. Langenbucher, A., Seitz, B., Huber, S., Nguyen, N. X. and Küchle, M. (2003c) Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. Arch. Ophthalmol. 121, 1722-1727.
12. Le Grand, Y. and El Hage, S. G. (1980) Physiological Optics (ed. D. L. MacAdam), Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
13. Long, W. F. (1974) Matrix optics of catadioptric systems. Am. J. Optom. Physiol Opt. 55, 760-764.
14. Nussbaum, A. (1968) Geometric Optics: An Introduction, (ed. A. Nussbaum), Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading.
15. Rosenblum, W. M. and Christensen, J. L. (1974) Optical matrix method: Optometric applications. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 51, 961-968.
16. Snead, M. P., Harman, S., Rubinstein, M. P., Reynolds, K. and Haworth, S. M. (1991) Determination of the nodal point position in the pseudophakic eye. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 11, 105-108.