A theoretical foundation of variability in component-based development

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 663-673

  Kim, Soo Dong ^a   Her, Jin Sun ^a   Chang, Soo Ho ^a  

^a Soongsil University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Component based development; Theoretical foundation; Variability

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); FUNCTIONS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SURVEYS;

COMPONENT-BASED DEVELOPMENT; THEORETICAL FOUNDATION; VARIABILITY; VARIABILITY SCOPES;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 21244466722     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. S. Kim Lessons learned from a nation-wide CBD promotion project Communications of the ACM 45 10 2002
2. D. Weiss, and C. Lai Software Product Line Engineering: a Family Based Software Engineering Process 1999 Addison Wesley Reading, MA
3. C. Atkinson, J. Bayer, C. Bunse, E. Kamsties, O. Laitenberger, R. Laqua, D. Muthig, B. Paech, J. Wust, and J. Zettel Component-based Product Line Engineering with UML 2001 Addison Wesley Reading, MA
4. F. Bachmann, L. Bass. Managing variability in software architecture, at http://www.sei.cmu.edu/plp/variability.pdf, Software Engineering Institute, 2001.
5. D. Muthig, and C. Atkinson Model-driven product line architectures Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2379, Proceedings of the Second Software Product Line Conference 2002
6. S. Lee, Y. Yang, E. Cho, S. Kim, and S. Rhew COMO: a UML-based component development methodology Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC99) 1999
7. D.C. Sharp Containing and facilitating change via object oriented tailoring techniques Proceedings of the First Software Product Line Conference, Denver, Colorado, August 2000
8. M. Becker, L. Geyer, A. Gilbert, and K. Becker Comprehensive variability modeling to facilitate efficient variability treatment Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2290, Proceedings of Fourth International Workshop on Product Family Engineering 2002
9. K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak, A. Peterson. Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study, Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1990.
10. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1992.
11. J. Coplien, D. Hoffman, and D. Weiss Commonality and variability in software engineering IEEE Software November 1998
12. L. Geyer, and M. Becker On the influence of variabilities on the application-engineering process of a product family Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2379, Proceedings of the Second Software Product Line Conference 2002
13. I. Jacobson, M. Griss, and P. Josson Software Reuse 1997 Addison Wesley Reading, MA
14. M. Griss Product-line architectures Component-Based Software Engineering 2001 Addison Wesley Reading, MA (chapter 22)
15. S. Kim, and J. Park C-QM: a practical quality model for evaluating COTS components Proceedings of IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering, Innsbruck, Austria 2003
16. D. D'Souza, and A. Wills Objects, Components, and Frameworks with UML 1999 Addison Wesley Reading, MA
17. Object Management Group, CORBA Components, Version 3.0, June, 2002.
18. Sun Microsystems, Enterprise JavaBeans Specification, Version 2.1, August, 2002.