Effects of school size: A review of the literature with recommendations

Essays in Education

Volumn 13, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Slate, John R ^a   Jones, Craig H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^b ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244465929     PISSN: 15279359     EISSN: 15279359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. (1984). Washington, DC: National Commission on Excellence in Education.
2. Alspaugh, J. (1994). The relationship between school size, student teacher ratio, and school efficiency. Education, 114, 593-597.
3. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4. Barker, R. G., & Gump, P. V. (1964). Big school, small school. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
5. Barrington, B., & Hendricks, B. (1989). Differentiating characteristics of high school graduates, dropouts, and non-graduates. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 309-319.
6. Berlin, B. M., & Cienkus, R. C. (1989). Size: The ultimate educational issue? Education and Urban Society, 21, 228-231.
7. Brookover, W., Beady, C., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School social systems and student achievement: Schools can make a difference. New York: Praeger.
8. Bossert, S. T. (1988). School effects. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 341-352). New York: Longman.
9. th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
10. Caldas, S. J. (1993). Reexamination of input and process factor effects on public school achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 206-214.
11. Campbell, R. F., & Mazzoni, T. L. (1976). State policy making for the public schools. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
12. Carruthers, W. (1993). All about attendance: A manual and case studies for schools and families (Report No. CG 025 119). Raleigh, NC: Wake County Public School System. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 364 799).
13. Chambers, J., & Parrish, T. (1994). State-level education finance. In H. J. Walberg & W. S. Barnett (Eds.), Advances in educational productivity: Vol.4. Cost analysis for education decisions: Methods and examples (pp. 45-74). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14. Conant, J. B. (1959). The American high school today. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Conant, J. B. (1967). The comprehensive high school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Cotton, K. (1996). School size, school climate, and student performance. School Improvement Research Series, Close-up #20. Retrieved March 26, 2003 from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/10/c020.html.
17. Crone, L., Glascock, C., Franklin, B., & Kochan, S. (1993, November). An examination of attendance in Louisiana schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
18. Damico, S. B., & Roth, J. (1993). General track students' perceptions of school policies and practices. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27, 1-8.
19. Edington, E. D., & Gardener, C. E. (1984). The relationship of school size to scores in the affective domain from the Montana testing service examination. Education, 105, 40-45.
20. Fetler, M. (1989). School dropout rates, academic performance, size, and poverty: Correlates of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 109-116.
21. Finn, J. (1998). Class size and students at risk: What is known? What is next? A commissioned paper. National Institute on the Education of At-Risk Students. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
22. Forbes, R. H., Fortune, J. C., & Packard, A. L. (1993, February). North Carolina rural initiative study of secondary schools: Funding effects on depth of the curriculum. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Clearwater, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 360 133).
23. Fowler, W. J., Jr. (1995). School size and student outcomes. In H. J. Walberg & W. S. Barnett (Eds.), Advances in educational productivity: Vol. 5. (pp.3-26). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
24. Fowler, W. J., Jr., & Walberg, H. J. (1991). School size, characteristics, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 189-202.
25. Fox, W. F. (1980). Relationships between size of schools and school districts and the cost of education. (Technical Bulletin No. 1621). Washington, DC: Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service (DOA). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 187 029).
26. Fox, W. F. (1981). Reviewing economies of size in education. Journal of Education Finance, 6, 273-296.
27. Franklin, B. J., & Crone, L. J. (1992, November). School accountability: Predictors and indicators of Louisiana school effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Association, Knoxville, TN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 354 261).
28. Frederick, W., & Walberg, H. J. (1980). Learning as a function of time. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 183-194.
29. Friedkin, N. E., & Necochea, J. (1988). School system size and performance: A contingency perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10, 237-249.
30. Gladden, R. (1998). The small school movement: A review of the literature. In M. Fine and J. Sommerville (Eds.), Small schools big imaginations: A creative look at urban public schools (pp. 113-117). Chicago: Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform.
31. Gooding, R. Z., & Wagner, J. A., III. (1985). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between size and performance: The productivity and efficiency of organizations and their subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 462-481.
32. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Green, J., & Barnes, D. (1993). Discipline in secondary schools: How administrators deal with student misconduct. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 357 507).
34. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361-396.
35. Gregory, T. (1992). Small is too big: Achieving a critical anti-mass in the high school (Report No. RC 019 319). In Source book on school and district size, cost, and quality (Report No. RC 019 318). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs; Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 361 159).
36. Gregory, T. B., & Smith, G. R. (1987). High schools as communities: The small school reconsidered. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
37. Guthrie, J. W. (1979). Organizational scale and school success. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 17-27.
38. Guthrie, J. W., & Reed, R. J. (1986). Educational administration and policy: Effective leadership for American education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39. Haller, E. J. (1992). High school size and student indiscipline: Another aspect of the school consolidation issue? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 145-156.
40. Haller, E., Monk, D., & Tien, L. (1993). Small schools and higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 9, 66-73.
41. Harnisch, D. L. (1987). Characteristics associated with effective public high schools. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 233-240.
42. Hoagland, J. P. (1995). The effect of high school size on student achievement as measured by the California Assessment Program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of La Verne, CA.
43. Holland, A., & Andre, T. (1994). The relationship of self-esteem to selected personal and environmental resources of adolescents. Adolescence, 29, 345-360.
44. Howley, C. (1994). The academic effectiveness of small-scale schooling: An update. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No 372 897).
45. Howley, C. (1995, November 15). The Matthew principle: A West Virginia replication. [27 p.] Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 3(18). Retrieved March 26, 2003 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v3n18.html
46. Howley, C. (1997). Dumbing down by sizing up. The School Administrator, 54, 24-30.
47. Huang, G., & Howley, C. (1993). Mitigating disadvantage: Effects of small-scale schooling on student achievement in Alaska. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 9, 137-149.
48. Jackson, J. L. (1966). School size and program quality in southern high schools. Nashville, TN: Center for Southern Education Studies, George Peabody College for Teachers.
49. Jewell, R. (1989). School and school district size relationships: Costs, results, minorities, and private school enrollments. Education and Urban Society, 21, 140-153.
50. nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Kearney, J. M. (1994, February). The advantages of small rural schools. Final report to the Idaho Rural School Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 373 934).
52. Lindsay, P. (1982). The effect of high school size on student participation, satisfaction, and attendance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 57-65.
53. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1994). Effects of high school restructuring and size on gains in achievement and engagement for early secondary school students. Washington, D. C.: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, supported by the U. S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (Grant No. RI 17Q00005-94).
54. McGuffey, C. W., & Brown, C. L. (1978). The relationship of school size and rate of school plant utilization to cost variations of maintenance and operation. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 373-378.
55. McGuire, K. (1989). School size: The continuing controversy. Education and Urban Society, 21, 164-174.
56. McKenzie, P. (1983, April). The distribution of school size: Some cost implications. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 232 256).
57. Meier, D. W. (1996, September). The big benefits of smallness. Educational Leadership, 54, 12-15.
58. Midwest Research Institute. (1974, March). Decision criteria and policy for school consolidation. Final report. MRI Project RA - 115-D)(1). Kansas City, MO: Kansas City School District, MO.
59. Monk, D. H. (1987). Secondary school size and curriculum comprehensiveness. Economics of Education Review, 6, 137-150.
60. Monk, D. H. (1992). Modern conceptions of educational quality and state policy regarding small schooling units (Report No. RC 019 320). In Source book on school and district size, cost, and quality (Report No. RC 019 318). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs; Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 361 160).
61. Monk, D. H., & Haller, E. J. (1993). Predictors of high school academic course offerings: The role of school size. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 3-21.
62. Morris, H. J. (1964). Relationship of school size toper pupil expenditures in secondary schools in the southern region. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College for Teachers, Nashville, TN.
63. Mullins, C. (1973). School district consolidation: Odds are 2 to 1 it'll get you. American School Board Journal, 160, 23-26.
64. National Center for Education Statistics. (1998). Digest of Education Statistics 1997. Washington, DC: US Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
65. Newman, D. L., & Brown, R. D. (1992). Patterns of school board decision making: Variations in behavior and perceptions. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26, 1-6.
66. Pethel, G. E. (1978). An investigation of the relationship of school size and program quality in the public high schools of Georgia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
67. Pittman, R. B., & Haughwout, P. (1987). Influence of high school size on dropout rate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 337-343.
68. Ramirez, A. (1992). Size, cost, and quality of schools and school districts: A question of context (Report No. RC 019 322). In Source book on school and district size, cost, and quality (Report No. RC 019 318). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs; Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 361 162).
69. Roellke, C. (1996). Curriculum adequacy and quality in high schools enrolling fewer than 400 pupils (9-12). ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. RC 020 837.
70. Sabulao, C. M. (1971). Optimum size of school districts relative to selected costs. Journal of Educational Administration, 9, 178-192.
71. Schneider, B. L. (1980). America's small schools. Las Cruces, NM: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
72. Schoggen, P., & Schoggen, M. (1988). Student voluntary participation and high school size. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 288-293.
73. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995, November). Small schools, great expectations. Educational Leadership, 53, 48-52.
74. Sher, J. P., & Tompkins, R. B. (1977). Economy, efficiency, and equality: The myths of rural school district consolidation. CEFP Journal, 15, 4-14.
75. Smith, M. L. & Glass, G. V. (1980). Meta-analysis of research on class size and its relationship to attitudes and instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 419-433.
76. Stevens, N. G., & Peltier, G. L. (1994). A review of research on small-school student participation in extracurricular activities. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 10, 116-120.
77. Stockard, J., & Mayberry, M. (1992). Effective Educational Environments. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 674).
78. Stolp, S., & Smith S. C. (1995). Transforming school culture. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
79. Swanson, A. D. (1988). The matter of size: A review of the research on relationships between school and district size, pupil achievement, and cost. Research in Rural Education, 5, 1-8.
80. Sybouts, W., & Bartling, D. (1988). Rural school board presidents look at school reorganization. Lincoln, NE: Bureau of Educational Research and Field Services. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 317 359).
81. Texas Education Agency. (1999). School size and class size in Texas public schools. Report Number 12. Document Number GE9 600 03. Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency Office of Policy Planning and Research
82. Thomas, H. W. (1987). The relationship between performance on the Georgia criterion referenced test and selected school effectiveness indicators. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
83. Turner, C. C., & Thrasher, J. M. (1970). School size does make a difference. San Diego, CA: Institute for Educational Management. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 043 946).
84. Unks, G. (1989). Differences in curriculum within a school setting. Education and Urban Society, 21, 175-191.
85. Viadero, D. (1998, May 6). N.Y.C. study weighs costs of small schools. Education Week. Retrieved March 25, 2003 from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory. cfm?slug=34study.h17&key words=Viadero
86. Walberg, H. J. (1992). On local control: Is bigger better? (Report No. RC 019 324). In Source book on school and district size, cost, and quality (Report No. RC 019318). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs; Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 361 164).
87. Walberg, H. J., & Walberg, H. J., III. (1994). Losing local control. Educational Researcher, 23, 19-26.
88. Wiles, D. K. (1994). What is useful policy information in school consolidation debates? Journal of Education Finance, 19, 292-318.
89. Wynne, E., & Walberg, H. (1995). The virtues of intimacy in education. Educational Leadership, 5, 53-54.