The influence of peritoneal surface area on dialysis adequacy

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 25, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2005, Pages

  Fischbach, Michel ^a,c   Dheu, Céline ^a   Helms, Pauline ^a   Terzic, Joëlle ^a   Michallat, Anne Cécile ^a   Laugel, Vincent ^a   Wolff Danner, Stéphanie ^a   Haraldsson, Borje ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Adequacy; Children; Peritoneal membrane; Surface area

Indexed keywords

DIALYSIS FLUID; GLUCOSE DEGRADATION PRODUCT;

AGE; ARTERY PERFUSION; ARTIFICIAL KIDNEY; BODY SURFACE; BODY WEIGHT; CHILD; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INFANT; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MESENTERY BLOOD FLOW; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONEAL FLUID; PERITONEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 21244461553     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089686080502503s36     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Dedrick RL, Flessner MF, Collins JM, Schultz JS. Is the peritoneum a membrane? ASAIO J 1982; 5:1-8.
2. Fischbach M, Haraldsson B, Helms P, Danner S, Laugel V, Terzic J. The peritoneal membrane: a dynamic dialysis membrane in children. Adv Perit Dial 2003; 19:265-8.
3. Fischbach M, Haraldsson B. Dynamic changes of total pore area available for peritoneal exchange in children. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12:1524-9.
4. Fischbach M, Stefanidis CJ, Watson A, for the European Pediatric Dialysis Working Group. Guidelines by an ad hoc European committee on adequacy of the pediatric peritoneal dialysis prescription. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17:380-5.
5. Mortier S, De Vriese AS, Van De Voorde J, Schaub TP, Passlick-Deetjen J, Lameire NH. Hemodynamic effects of peritoneal dialysis solutions on the rat peritoneal membrane: role of acidity, buffer choice, glucose concentration, and glucose degradation products. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13:480-9.
6. Fischbach M, Terzic J, Chauvé S, Laugel V, Muller A, Haraldsson B. Effect of peritoneal dialysis fluid composition on peritoneal area available for exchange in children. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19:925-32.
7. Esperanca MJ, Collins DL. Peritoneal dialysis efficiency in relation to body weight. J Pediatr Surg 1966; 1:162-9.
8. Fischbach M, Terzic J, Menouer S, Haraldsson B. Optimal volume prescription for children on peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2000; 20:603-6.
9. Schroder C. Optimal peritoneal dialysis: choice of volume and solution. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19:782-4.
10. Kohaut EC, Waldo FB, Bienfeld M. The effects of changes in dialysate volume on glucose and urea equilibration. Perit Dial Int 1994; 14:236-9.
11. Flessner MF, Lofthouse J. Zakaria ER. Improving contact area between the peritoneum and intraperitoneal therapeutic solutions. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12:807-13.
12. Chagnac A, Herskovitz P, Weinstein T, Elyasin S, Hirsh J, Hammel I. The peritoneal membrane in peritoneal dialysis patients: estimation of its functional surface area applying stereologic methods to computerized tomography scan. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10:342-6.
13. Chagnac A, Herskovitz P, Yaacov O, Weinstein T, Hirsh J, Katz M, et al. Effect of increased dialysate volume on peritoneal surface area among peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13:2254-9.
14. Hass S, Schmitt CP, Arbeiter K, Bonzel KE, Fischbach M, John U, et al. Improved acidosis correction and recovery of mesothelial cell mass with neutral pH bicarbonate dialysis solution among children undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:2632-8.
15. Fischbach M, Terzic J, Laugel V, Escande B, Dangelser C, Helmstetter A. Measurement of hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure: a useful tool for the improvement of dialysis prescription. Pediatr Nephrol 2003; 18:976-80.