A system for measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions at ultra-sonic frequencies in rodents

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 237-243

  Rasmussen, Arne Nørby ^a   Osterhammel, Poul Aabo ^a   Lund, Søren Peter ^b   Kristiansen, Gitte Bondegård ^b   Andersen, Svend ^a  

^a University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR THE WORKING ENVIRONMENT   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions; Reproducibility; Rodents; Ultrasonic frequency

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT; NOISE POLLUTION; NONHUMAN; OTOTOXICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIMULATOR; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; ULTRASOUND;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACOUSTICS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FOURIER ANALYSIS; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TRANSDUCERS; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 21244456474     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020500057640     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Anastasi, A. 1976. Psychological Testing. (4th edn) New York: MacMillan.
2. Beattie, R.C., Kenworthy, O.T. & Luna, C.A. 2003. Immediate and short-term reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Int J Audiol, 42, 348-354.
3. Demorest, M.E. & Walden, B.E. 1984. Psychometric principles in the selection, interpretation, and evaluation of communication self-assessment inventories. J Speech Hear Disord, 49, 226-240.
4. Frederiksen, E. 1977. Condenser Microphones used as Sound Sources. Technical Review no. 3, Brüel & Kjœr.
5. Heffner, R.S., Koya, G. & Heffner, H.E. 2001. Audiograms of five species of rodents: implications for the evolution of hearing and the perception of pitch. Hear Res, 157, 138-152.
6. Kemp, D.T. 1978. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am, 64, 1386-1391.
7. Khvoles, R., Freeman, S. & Sohmer, H. 1998. Effect of temperature on the transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in rats. Audiol Neurootol, 3, 349-360.
8. Kössl, M. & Vater, M. 2000. Consequences of outer hair cell damage for otoacoustic emissions and audiovocal feedback in the mustached bat. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 4, 300-314.
9. Kössl, M. 1994. Otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea of the 'constant frequency' bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi. Hear Res, 72, 59-72.
10. Zhao, F. & Stephens, D. 1999. Test-retest variability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in human ears with normal hearing. Scand Audiol, 28, 171-178.