The timing of first marriage: Are there religious variations?

Journal of Family Issues

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 584-618

  Xu, Xiaohe ^a,c   Hudspeth, Clark D ^b   Bartkowski, John P ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Department of Sociology Anthropology and Social Work ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Denominational subcultural paradigm; First marriage; Marriage timing; Religious subcultural variations; Religious variations

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244450309     PISSN: 0192513X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0192513X04272398     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transaction and Automatic Control, AC-19, 716-723.
2. Albrecht, S. L., & Heaton, T. B. (1984). Secularization, higher education, and religiosity. Review of Religious Research, 26, 43-58.
3. Allison, P. D. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
4. Althaus, F. (1992). Differences in fertility of Catholics and Protestants are related to timing and prevalence of marriage. Family Planning Perspectives, 24, 234-235.
5. Alwin, D. F. (1986). Religion and parental child-rearing orientations: Evidence of a Catholic-Protestant convergence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 412-440.
6. Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (1992). The influence of parental resources on the timing of the transition to marriage. Social Science Research, 21, 261-285.
7. Bahr, H. M. (1982). Religious contrasts in family role definitions and performance: Utah Mormons, Catholics, Protestants, and others. Journal for Scientific Study of Religion, 21, 200-217.
8. Bartkowski, J. P. (2001). Remaking the godly marriage: Gender negotiation in evangelical families. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
9. Bartkowski, J. P., & Read, J. G. (2003). Veiled submission: Gender negotiation among evangelical and U.S. Muslim women. Qualitative Sociology, 26, 71-92.
10. Bartkowski, J. P., & Xu, X. (2000). Distant patriarchs or expressive dads? The discourse and practice of fathering in conservative Protestant families. Sociological Quarterly, 41, 465-485.
11. Beaman, L. G. (2001). Molly Mormons, Mormon feminists and moderates: Religious diversity in the Latter-Day Saints Church. Sociology of Religion, 62, 65-86.
12. Bennett, N. G., Blanc, A. K., & Bloom, D. E. (1988). Commitment and the modern union: Assessing the link between premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability. American Sociological Review, 53, 127-138.
13. Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., Branaman, A., & Sica, A. (1995). Belief and behavior: Does religion matter in today's marriage? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 661-671.
14. Brabant, S., Forsyth, C., & Gramling, R. (1992). Organizational change in the Roman Catholic Church: The marriage preparation policy as case study. Review of Religious Research, 33, 256-269.
15. Bumpass, L. L., Sweet, J., & Cherlin, A. J. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 913-927.
16. Casper, L. M., & Bianchi, S. (2002). Continuity and change in the American family. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Cherlin, A., & Celebuski, C. (1983). Are Jewish families different? Some evidence from the General Social Survey. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 903-910.
18. Cherlin, A. J. (1992). Marriage, divorce, remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Chiswick, B. R. (1986). Labor supply and investments in child quality: A study of Jewish and non-Jewish women. Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 700-703.
20. Christiano, K. (2000). Religion and the family in modern American culture. In S. K. Houseknecht & J. G. Pankhurst (Eds.), Family, religion, and social change in diverse societies (pp. 43-78). New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Coltrane, S., & Collins, R. (2001). Sociology of marriage and the family: Gender, love, and property. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
22. D'Antonio, W. V. (1985). The American Catholic family: Signs of cohesion and polarization. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 395-405.
23. D'Antonio, W. V., & Cavanaugh, M. I. (1983). Roman Catholicism and the family. In W. V. D' Antonio & J. Aldous (Eds.), Families and religions: Conflict and change in modern society (pp. 141-162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24. D'Antonio, W. V., Davidson, J. D., Hoge, D. R., & Meyer, K. (2001). American Catholics: Gender, generation, and commitment. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
25. Darnell, A., & Sherkat, D. E. (1997). The impact of Protestant fundamentalism on educational attainment. American Sociological Review, 62, 306-315.
26. Della Pergolla, S. (1980). Patterns of American Jewish fertility. Demography, 17, 261-273.
27. Denison, B. J. (1990). Papal authority: The case of marriage validity in the USA. Social Compass, 37, 269-279.
28. Dillon, M. (1999). Catholic identity: Balancing faith, reason, and power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Ellison, C. G., & Bartkowski, J. P. (2002). Conservative Protestantism and the division of household labor among married couples. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 950-985.
30. Ellison, C. G., Bartkowski, J. P., & Anderson, K. L. (1999). Are there religious variations in domestic violence? Journal of Family Issues, 20, 87-113.
31. Ellison, C. G., Bartkowski, J. P., & Segal, M. L. (1996). Conservative Protestantism and the parental use of corporal punishment. Social Forces, 74, 1003-1028.
32. England, P. (2000). Marriage, the costs of children, and gender inequality. In L. J. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thompson, & A. Thornton (Eds.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 320-342). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
33. Featherstone, R. (2001). Compliance as dissidence: Young Catholics and sexual ethics. Sociological Focus, 34, 139-154.
34. Ferguson, S. J. (1995). Marriage timing of Chinese American and Japanese American women. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 324-343.
35. Forthofer, M.S., Kessler, R. C., Story, A. L., & Gotlib, I. H. ( 1996). The effects of psychiatric disorder on the probability and timing of first marriage. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 37, 121-132.
36. Gallagher, S. K. (2003). Evangelical identity and gendered family life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
37. Gay, D. A., Ellison, C. G., & Powers, D. A. (1996). In search of denominational subcultures: Religious affiliation and "pro-family" issues revisited. Review of Religious Research, 38, 3-17.
38. Goldscheider, C. (1967). Fertility of the Jews. Demography, 4, 196-209.
39. Grasmick, H. G., Wilcox, L. P., & Bird, S. K. (1990). The effects of religious fundamentalism and religiosity on preference for traditional family norms. Sociological Inquiry, 60, 352-369.
40. Greeley, A. M. (1990). The Catholic myth: The behavior and beliefs of American Catholics. New York: Macmillan.
41. Hadden, J. K. (1983). Televangelism and the mobilization of a new Christian right family policy. In W. V. D'Antonio & J. Aldous (Eds.), Families and religions: Conflict and change in modern society (pp. 247-266). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42. Hammond, J. A., Cole, B. S., & Beck, S. H. (1993). Religious heritage and teenage marriage. Review of Religious Research, 35, 117-133.
43. Hansen, G. L. (1991). Religiosity and the marital adjustment process. Family Perspective, 25, 7-17.
44. Hargrove, B. (1983). Family in the White American Protestant experience. In W. V. D'Antonio & J. Aldous (Eds.), Families and religions: Conflict and change in modern society (pp. 113-140). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45. Hartman, M., & Hartman, H. (1996). Gender equality and American Jews. Albany: State University of New York Press.
46. Heaton, T. B. (1984). Religious homogamy and marital satisfaction reconsidered. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 729-733.
47. Heaton, T. B. (1986). How does religion influence fertility? The case of Mormons. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 25, 248-258.
48. Heaton, T. B. (2002). Factors contributing to increasing marital stability in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 392-409.
49. Heaton, T. B., & Cornwall, M. (1989). Religious group variation in the socioeconomic status and family behavior of women. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 283-299.
50. Heaton, T. B., & Goodman, K. L. (1985). Religion and family formation. Review of Religious Research, 26, 343-359.
51. Hegy, P., & Martos, J. (Eds.). (2000). Catholic divorce: The deception of annulments. Dulles, VA: Continuum.
52. Hertel, B. R., & Hughes, M. (1987). Religious affiliation, attendance, and support for "pro-family" issues in the U.S. Social Forces, 65, 858-882.
53. Johnson, R. A. (1980). Religious assortative mating in the United States. New York: Academic Press.
54. Kalmijn, M. (1991). Shifting boundaries: Trends in religious and educational homogamy. American Sociological Review, 56, 786-800.
55. Lehrer, E. L. (1995). The effects of religion on the labor supply of married women. Social Science Research, 24, 281-301.
56. Lehrer, E. L. (1996). Religion as a determinant of fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 9, 173-196.
57. Lehrer, E. L. (1999). Religion as a determinant of educational attainment: An economic perspective. Social Science Research, 28, 358-379.
58. Lehrer, E. L. (2000). Religion as a determinant of entry into cohabitation and marriage. In L. J. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thomson, & A. Thornton (Eds.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 227-252). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
59. Lehrer, E. L., & Chiswick, C. U. (1993). Religion as a determinant of marital stability. Demography, 30, 385-404.
60. Li, J. H., & Wojtkiewicz, R. A. (1994). Childhood family structure and entry into first marriage. Sociological Quarterly, 35, 247-268.
61. Lobdell, W. (2000, April 8). Holy matrimony: In era of divorce, Mormon temple weddings are built to last. Los Angeles Times, n.p.
62. Manning, C. (1999). God gave us the right: Conservative Catholic, evangelical Protestant, and Orthodox Jewish women grapple with feminism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
63. Marcum, J. P. (1981). Explaining fertility differentials among U.S. Protestants. Social Forces, 60, 532-543.
64. Marcum, J. P. (1988). Religious affiliation, participation and fertility: A cautionary note. Journal for Scientific Study of Religion, 27, 621-629.
65. McNamara, P. H. (1985). American Catholicism in the mid-eighties: Pluralism and conflict in a changing church. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 480, 63-74.
66. Michael, R. T., & Tuma, N. (1985). Entry into marriage and parenthood by young men and women: The influence of family background. Demography, 22, 515-544.
67. Mosher, W. D., Williams, L. B., & Johnson. D. P. (1992). Religion and fertility in the United States: New patterns. Demography, 29, 199-214.
68. Mullaney, J. W., & Otey, E. (1983). Preparation for marriage: Promise and problems. Social Thought, 9, 17-34.
69. Nock, S. L. (1998). Marriage in men's lives. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Men in families: When do they get involved? What difference does it make? (pp. 227-237). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
70. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 563-591.
71. Oppenheimer, V. K., Kalmijn, M., & Lim, N. (1997). Men's career development and marriage timing during a period of rising inequality. Demography, 34, 311-330.
72. Peek, C. W., Lowe, G. D., & Williams, L. S. (1991). Gender and God's word: Another look at religious fundamentalism and sexism. Social Forces, 69, 1205-1221.
73. Pohlhaus, G. M. (1998). Catholics and Protestants, conservatives and liberals: Christian marriage today. In J. Martos & P. Hegy (Eds.), Equal at the creation: Sexism, society, and Christian thought (pp. 143-62). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
74. Rebhun, U. (1999). Jewish identification in intermarriage: Does a spouse's religion (Catholic vs. Protestant) matter? Sociology of Religion, 60, 71-88.
75. religioustolerance.org. (2003). U.S. divorce rates: For various faith group, age groups, and geographic areas. Retrieved May 23, 2003, from www.religioustolerance.org/chr_dira.htm
76. Rourke, M. (1998, June 16). A woman's place: What the denominations think. Los Angeles Times, n.p.
77. Sander, W. (1995). The Catholic family: Marriage, children, and human capital. Boulder, CO: Westview.
78. Sassler, S. L. (1997). Women's marital timing at the turn of the century: Generational and ethnic differences. Sociological Quarterly, 38, 567-585.
79. Shehan, C. L., Bock, W. E., & Lee, G. R. (1990). Religious heterogamy, religiosity, and marital happiness: The case of Catholics. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 73-79.
80. Sherkat, D. E. (2000). "That they be keepers of the home": The effect of conservative religion on early and late transitions into housewifery. Review of Religious Research, 41, 344-358.
81. Sherkat, D. E., & Darnell, A. (1999). The effects of parents' fundamentalism on children's educational attainment: Examining differences by gender and children's fundamentalism. Journal for Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 23-35.
82. Smith, C. (1998). American evangelicalism: Embattled and thriving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
83. Smith, C. (2000). Christian America? What evangelicals really want. Berkeley: University of California Press.
84. Smith, T. W. (1990). Classifying Protestant denominations. Review of Religious Research, 31, 225-245.
85. Stata. (2001). Stata reference manual: Release 7. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
86. Sweet, J. A., Bumpass, L. L., & Call, V. (1988). The design and content of the National Survey of Families and Households (NSFH Working Paper, No. 1). Madison: Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin.
87. Teachman, J. D., & Hayward, M. D. (1993). Interpreting hazard rate models. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 340-371.
88. Teachman, J. D., Tedrow, L. M., & Crowder, K. D. (2000). The changing demography of America's families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1234-1246.
89. Thomas, D. L. (1983). Family in the Mormon experience. In W. V. D'Antonia & J. Aldous (Eds.), Families and religions: Conflict and change in modern society (pp. 267-88). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
90. Thornton, A. (1979). Religion and fertility: The Case of Mormonism. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 131-142.
91. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Hill, D. H. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 628-651.
92. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Teachman, J. D. (1995). The influence of school enrolment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60, 762-774.
93. U.S. Catholic Conference. (1977). Declaration on sexual ethics: Sacred congregation for the doctrine of the faith. Washington, DC: Persona Humana.
94. U.S. Census Bureau. (1999). Table MS-2. Estimated median age at first marriage, by sex: 1890 to the present. America's families and living arrangement: 2003 and earlier reports (Annual social and economic supplement: 2003 Current Population Survey, Current population report, Series P20-553). Washington, DC: Author.
95. U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Statistical abstract of the United States: 2001 (121st edition). Washington, DC: Author.
96. Waite, L. J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32, 483-507.
97. White, L. K. (1990). Determinants of divorce: A review of research in the eighties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 904-912.
98. Wilcox, W. B. (1999). Emerging attitudes about gender roles and fatherhood. In D. E. Eberly (Ed.), The faith factor in fatherhood: Renewing the sacred vocation of fathering (pp. 219-40). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
99. Wilcox, W. B. (2002a). For the sake of the children? Mainline Protestant family-related discourse and practice. In R. Wuthnow & J. H. Evans (Eds.), The quiet hand of God: Faith-based activism and the public role of mainline Protestantism (pp. 287-316). Berkeley: University of California Press.
100. Wilcox, W. B. (2002b). Religion, convention, and paternal involvement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 780-792.
101. Wilcox, W. B., & Chaves. M. (n.d.). Focused on the family? Religious traditions, family discourse, and pastoral practice. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
102. Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1996). Religion and marital dependency. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35, 30-40.
103. Wu, Z. (1999). Premarital cohabitation and the timing of first marriage. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 36, 109-127.
104. Xu, X., & Toth, J. F., Jr. (1997, November). The general and enduring effects of religious homogamy and religiosity on the quality of marriages in the United States. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the National Council on Family Relations, Crystal City, Virginia.