Paradigms for the new string instrument: Digital and materials technology

Organised Sound

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 135-147

  Livingston, Hugh ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244440551     PISSN: 13557718     EISSN: 14698153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1355771800005045     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. International Computer Music Association's Working Group on Interactive Systems and Instrument Design in Music. Website: http://www.notam.uio.no/icma/interactivesystems/ wg.html
2. Mathews, M. 1984. Electronic violin: a research tool. Journal of the Violin Society of America VIII(1): 71–88.
3. Paradiso, J. 1999. American innovations in electronic musical instruments. New Music Box 17. Website: http://www.newmusicbox.org/third-person/index_oct99.html
4. Gillespie, B. 1999. Haptics. In P. Cook (ed.) Music, Cognition and Computerized Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Machover, T. 2000. Website: http://www.media.mit.edu/~tod/
6. Machover, T., and Chung, J. 1989. Hyperinstruments: musically intelligent and interactive performance and creative systems. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf (Columbus, OH), p 186. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
7. Paradiso, J., and Gershenfeld, N. 1997. Musical applications of electric field sensing. Computer Music Journal 21(3): 68–89.
8. Zimmermann, T. G. 1996. Personal Area Networks: Nearfield intrabody communication. Website: http://www. research.ibm.com/journal/sj/mit/sectione/zimmerman.html
9. Schoner, B. 2000. The digital Stradivarius. Website: http://www.media.mit.edu/~schoner/ttt/
10. Schoner, B., Cooper, C., and Gershenfeld, N. 2000. Cluster-weighted sampling for synthesis and cross-synthesis of violin family instruments. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. (Berlin, Germany), pp. 376–9. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
11. Nichols, C. 2000. The vBow: A haptic musical controller human-computer interface. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf (Berlin, Germany), pp. 274–6. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
12. Nichols. C. Website: http://www-ccrma.stanford.edu/ ~cnichols/
13. O’Modhrain, M. S., and Chafe, C. 2000. The performer-instru-ment interaction: a sensory motor perspective. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. (Berlin, Germany), pp. 145–8. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
14. O’Modhrain, M. S., Serafin, S., Chafe C., and Smith, J. O. 2000. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of a virtual bowed string instrument. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. (Berlin, Germany), pp. 66–9. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
15. Serafin, S. 2000. Sistema tempo reale archetto digitale. Website : http ://www-ccrma. stanford.edu/~serafin/
16. Serafin, S., and Smith, J. O. 2000. Influence of attack parameters on the playability of a virtual bowed string instrument. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. (Berlin, Germany), pp. 473–6. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
17. Thompson, J. 2000. Chinese zither construction. Website: http://www.iohk.eom/U serPages/thompson/02b 1 qin.htm
18. Bahn, C. 2000. New string bass controllers. Website: http://www.music.princeton.edu/~crb
19. Chafe, C. 2000. The celletto. Website: http://www-ccrma.stanford.edu/~cc/
20. Trueman, D. 1999. Reinventing the violin. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University. Website: http://silvertone. princeton.edu/~dan/rtv/index.html
21. Trueman, D. 2000. BoSSA, the bowed-sensor-speaker-array. Website: http://silvertone.princeton.edu/~dan/BoSSA/
22. Trueman, D., and Cook, P. 1999. BoSSA: The deconstructed violin reconstructed. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. (Beijing, China), pp. 232–9. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
23. Livingston H. 2000. New Repertoire Series. Website: http://www.stringsandmachines.com