An assessment of the feasibility and utility of the MS Symptom and Impact Diary (MSSID)

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1363-1374

  Greenhalgh, Joanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Feasibility; Multiple sclerosis; Qualitative; Symptoms; Utility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OUTPATIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELAPSE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROLOGY; OUTPATIENTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE;

EID: 21244437598     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-004-5389-0     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. J Greenhalgh H Ford A Long K Hurst 2004 The multiple sclerosis symptom and impact diary (MSSID): A new instrument to measure the day to day impact of multiple sclerosis J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75 577 582
2. D Parkin A Jacoby P McNamee P Miller S Thomas D Bates 2000 Treatment of multiple sclerosis with interferon beta: An appraisal of cost-effectiveness and quality of life J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68 2 144 149
3. HL Ford E Gerry A Tennant D Whalley R Haigh 2001 Developing a disease-specific quality of life measure for people with multiple sclerosis Clin Rehabil 15 3 247 258
4. JC Hobart D Lamping R Fitzpatrick 2001 The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) a new patient based outcome measure Brain 124 962 973
5. Robinson I, Hunter M, Neilson S. A Dispatch from the Front Line: The Views of People with MS about Their Needs. The Multiple Sclerosis Society 1996.
6. L Baker 1998 Sense making in multiple sclerosis: The information needs of people with MS during an acute exacerbation Qual Health Res 8 11 106 120
7. EF Juniper PM O'Byrne PJ Ferrie DR King JN Roberts 2000 Measuring asthma control.Clinic questionnaire or daily diary? Am J Resp Crit Care Med 162 4 Pt 1 1330 1334
8. LM Verbrugge 1980 Health diaries Med Care 18 1 73 95
9. JA Sloan CL Loprinzi PJ Novotny DL Barton BI Lavasseur H Windschitl 2001 Methodological lessons learned from hot flash studies J Clin Oncol 19 23 4280 4290
10. L Watson P Little M Moore G Warner I Williamson 2001 Validation study of a diary for use in acute lower respiratory tract infection Fam Pract 18 5 553 554
11. GK Montgomery NC Reynolds 1990 Compliance, reliability, and validity of self-monitoring for physical disturbances of Parkinson's disease.The Parkinson's Symptom Diary J Nerv Ment Dis 178 10 636 641
12. P Fayers 1995 MRC quality of life studies using a daily diary card - practical lessons learned from cancer trials Qual Life Res 4 4 343 352
13. G Norman A McFarlane D Streiner K Neale 1982 Health diaries: strategies for compliance and relations to other measures Med Care 20 6 623 629
14. E Maunsell P Allard M Dorval J Labbe 2000 A brief pain diary for ambulatory patients with advanced cancer: Acceptability and validity Cancer 88 10 2387 2397
15. J Marinus M Visser AM Stiggelbout JM Rabey U Bonuccelli PH Kraus 2002 Activity-based diary for Parkinson's disease Clin Neuropharm 25 1 43 50
16. ME Hyland CAP Kenyon R Allen P Howarth 1993 Diary keeping in asthma: Comparison of written and electronic methods BMJ 306 487 489
17. A Stone S Shiffman J Schwartz J Borderick MR Hufford 2002 Patient non-compliance with paper diaries BMJ 324 1193 1194
18. AA Stone RC Kessler JA Haythornthwaite 1991 Measuring daily events and experiences: Decisions for the researcher J Pers 59 3 575 607
19. LM Verbrugge DJ Balaban 1989 Patterns of change in disability and well being Med Care 27 Suppl 3 S128 S147
20. L Sherliker A Steptoe 2000 Coping with new treatments for cancer: A feasibility study of daily diary measures Pat Ed Couns 40 11 19
21. R de Wit F van Dam M Hanneman L Zandbelt A van Buuren HK van der 1999 Evaluation of the use of a pain diary in chronic cancer pain patients at home Pain 79 1 89 99
22. H Griffiths S Jordan 1998 Thinking of the future and walking back to normal: An exploratory study of patients' experiences during recovery from lower limb fracture J Adv Nurs 28 6 1276 1288
23. D Oleske S Heinze D Otte 1990 The diary as a means of understanding the quality of persons with cancer receiving home nursing care Cancer Nurs 13 3 158 166
24. P Allard E Maunsell J Labbe M Dorval 2001 Educational interventions to improve cancer pain control: A systematic review J Pall Med 4 2 191 203
25. FD Lublin SC Reingold 1996 Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: Results of an international survey Neurology 46 907 911
26. J Ritchie L Spencer 1994 Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research A Bryman RG Burgess Analyzing Qualitative Data Sage London
27. AN Oppenheim 1992 Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement 3 Gower London
28. S Sudman NM Bradburn 1982 Asking Questions Jossey-Bass San Francisco
29. S Mallinson 2002 Listening to respondents: A qualitative assessment of the Short Form 36 health status questionnaire Soc Sci Med 54 11 21
30. MAG Sprangers CE Schwartz 1999 Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model Soc Sci Med 48 1507 1515
31. LM Nelson GM Franklin RF Hanman DL Boteler M Baum JS Burks 1988 Referral bias in multiple sclerosis research J Clin Epidemiol 41 2 187 192
32. H Ford E Gerry CM Airey A Vail MH Johnson DRR Williams 1998 The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Leeds Health Authority area J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 64 5 605 610
33. RG Richards FC Sampson SM Beard P Tappenden 2002 A review of the natural history and epidemiology of multiple sclerosis: Implications for resource allocation and health economic models Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England) 6 10 63
34. GA Schumacher G Beebe RF Kibler RT Kurland JF Kurtzke F McDowell 1965 Problems of experimental trials of therapy of multiple sclerosis: Report by the panel on the evaluation of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis Ann N Y Acad Sci 122 552 568
35. C Jenkinson R Fitzpatrick A Garratt V Peto S Stewart-Brown 2001 Can item response theory reduce patient burden when measuring health status in neurological disorders? Results from Rasch analysis of the SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10) J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71 2 220 224
36. J Greenhalgh AF Long R Flynn 2005 The use of patient reported outcome measures in clinical practice: lacking an impact or lacking a theory? Soc Sci Med 60 833 843