3-D magnetic resonance angiography versus conventional angiography in peripheral arterial disease: Pilot study

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 373-377

  Sommerville, Ryan S ^a,b   Jenkins, Jason ^a   Walker, Phillip ^a   Olivotto, Rino ^a  

^a ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Digital subtraction; Gadolinium; Magnetic resonance angiography; Peripheral arterial disease; Three dimensional image

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM; IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; AORTA; ARTICLE; BYPASS SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG ARTERY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT PLANNING; VASCULAR SURGERY;

AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; PILOT PROJECTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 21244431974     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03395.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cardiovascular Health in Australia. A Review of Current Activities and Future Directions. Canberra: Department of Human Services and Health. Australian Government Publishing Service, 1994.
2. Hessel SJ, Adams DF, Abrams HL. Complications of angiography. Radiology 1981; 138: 273-81.
3. Eiberg JP, Lundhorf E, Thomsen C, Schroeder TV. Peripheral vascular surgery and magnetic resonance arteriography: a review. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2001; 22: 396-402.
4. Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A, Arnold M, Lovblad K, Schroth G. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2002; 23: 213-19.
5. Winterer JT, Schaefer O, Uhrmeister P et al. Contrast enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of relevant stenoses in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: diagnostic value of a two-step examination protocol in comparison to conventional DSA. Eur. J. Radiol. 2002; 41: 153-60.
6. Winterer JT, Jaubenberger J, Scheffler K et al. Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective Intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1999; 23: 583-9.
7. Reid SK, Pagan-Mann HR, Menzoian JO, Woodson J, Yucel EK. Contrast-enhanced moving table MR angiography: prospect comparison to catheter arteriography for treatment planning in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2001; 12: 45-53.
8. Chan YL, Leung CB, Yu S, Yeung D, Li P. Comparison of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation on allograft renal artery stenosis. Clin. Radiol. 2001; 56: 127-32.
9. Ofer A, Nitecki SS, Linn S et al. Multidetecto CT angiography of peripheral disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003; 180: 719-24.
10. Trusen A, Beissert M, Hahn D. Color doppler US findings in the diagnosis of arterial occlusive disease of the lower limb. Acta Radiologica. 2003; 44: 411-18.
11. Cronberg C, Sjoberg S, Albrechtsson U et al. Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography. Acta Radiologica. 2003; 44: 59-66.
12. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999; 211: 59-67.
13. Schoenberg SO, Essig M, Hallscheidt P et al. Multiphase magnetic resonance angiography of the abdominal and pelvic arteries. Invest. Radiol. 2002; 37: 20-8.