Verbal and nonverbal modality effects on impressions of political candidates: Analysis from the 1984 presidential debates

Communication Monographs

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 1992, Pages 231-242

  Patterson, Miles L ^a   Burger, Gary K ^a   Churchill, Mary E ^b   Powell, Jack L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

^b Graduate student ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21144481806     PISSN: 03637751     EISSN: 14795787     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03637759209376267     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Argyle, M., Alkema, F., & Gilmour, R. (1972). The communication of friendly and hostile attitudes by verbal and non-verbal signals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 385-400.
2. Argyle, M., Salter, V., Nicholson, H., Williams, M., & Burgess, P. (1970). The communication of inferior and superior attitudes by verbal and nonverbal signals. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 222-231.
3. Isurgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1989). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York: Harper Collins.
4. De Paulo, B. M., Zuckerman, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1980). Detecting deception: Modality effects. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 125-162.
5. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290.
6. Exline, R. V. (1985). Multichannel transmission of nonverbal behavior and the perception of powerful men: The Presidential Debates of 1976 (pp. 183-206). In S.L. Ellyson & J.F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. Gallup, G., Jr. (1986). The Gallup Poll: Public opinion 1985: 233-234.
8. Gallup, G., Jr. (1987). The Gallup Poll: Public opinion 1986: 255.
9. Gallup, G., Jr. (1988). Reagan’s job performance. The Gallup Report, 277, 25-27.
10. Gallup, G., Jr. (1989). Reagan: highest final ratings since Franklin Roosevelt. The Gallup Report, 280, 12-15.
11. Gilbert, D. T., & Krull, D. S. (1988). Seeing less and knowing more: The benefits of perceptual ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 193-202.
12. Keppel, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A research handbook (2nd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
13. Kraus, S. (1962). The great debates. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
14. Krauss, R. M., Apple, W., Morency, N., Wenzel, C., & Winton, W. (1981). Verbal, vocal, and visible factors in judgments of another’s affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 312-320.
15. Masters, R. D., Sullivan, D. G., Feola, A., & McHugo, G. J. (1987). Television coverage of candidates’ display behavior during the 1984 primaries in the United States. International Political Science Review, 8, 121-130.
16. Masters, R. D., Sullivan, D. G., Lanzetta, J. T., McHugo, G. J., & Englis, B. G. (1986). The facial displays of leaders: Toward an ethology of human politics. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 9, 319-343.
17. Mehrabian, A., & Wiener, M. (1967). Decoding of inconsistent communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 109-114.
18. Noller, P. (1985). Video primacy-a further look. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9, 28-17.
19. Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account ofits origin and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157-171.
20. Sullivan, D. G., & Masters, R. D. (1988). Happy warriors: Leaders’ facial displays, viewers’ emotions, and political support. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 345-368.
21. Swann, W. B., Jr. (1984). Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics. Psychological Review, 91, 457-477.