The Critique of Science Becomes Academic

Science, Technology & Human Values

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1993, Pages 247-259

  Martin, Brian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21144464627     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: 15528251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016224399301800208     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ackroyd, Carol, Karen Margolis, Jonathan Rosenhead, and Tim Shallice. 1977. The technology of political control. Harmondsworth, United Kingdom: Penguin.
2. Bammer, Gabriele, Ken Green, and Brian Martin. 1986. Who gets kicks out of science policy? Search 17:41–46
3. Barnes, Barry. 1974. Scientific knowledge and sociological theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4. Bernal, J.D. 1939. The social function of science. London : George Routledge.
5. Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledge and social imagery. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6. British Society for Social Responsibility in Science. 1985. Technocop—New police technologies. London: Free Association Books.
7. Chubin, Daryl E. 1992. The elusive second “S” in “STS”: Who'S zoomin’ who? Technoscience 5(Fall): 12–13.
8. Chubin, Daryl E., and Sal Restivo. 1983. The “mooting” of science studies: Research programmes and science policy. In Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science, edited by Karin D. Knorr-Cetina and Michael Mulkay, 53–83. London : Sage.
9. Clarke, Robin. 1971. The science of war and peace. London : Jonathan Cape.
10. Collins, H.M. 1990. Artificial experts: Social knowledge and intelligent machines. Cambridge: MIT Press.
11. Collins, Randall. 1979. The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. New York: Academic Press.
12. Darnovsky, Marcy. 1991. Overhauling the meaning machines: An interview with Donna Haraway. Socialist Review 21 (April-June): 65–84.
13. Delamont, Sara. 1987. Three blind spots? A comment on the sociology of science by a puzzled outsider. Social Studies of Science 17:163–70.
14. Dickson, David. 1974a. Technology and the construction of social reality. Radical Science Journal 1:29–50.
15. —. 1974b. Alternative technology and the politics of technical change. London: Fontana.
16. Firestone, Shulamith. 1971. The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. London: Cape.
17. Forman, Paul. 1971. Weimar culture, causality, and quantum theory, 1918-1927: Adaptation by German physicists and mathematicians to a hostile intellectual environment. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3:1–115.
18. Furner, Mary O. 1975. Advocacy and objectivity: A crisis in the professionalization of American social science, 1865-1905. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
19. Hessen, Boris. 1931. The social and economic roots of Newton'S “Principia.” In Science at the cross roads, by N. I. Bukharin et al., 147–212. London: Kniga.
20. Kuhn, Thomas S. [1962] 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
22. Lynd, Robert S. 1939. Knowledge for what? The place of social science in American culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. MacKenzie, Donald. 1990. Inventing accuracy: An histoncal sociology of nuclear missile guidance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
24. Mulkay, Michael. 1979. Science and the sociology of knowledge. London: Allen & Unwin.
25. Ravetz, Jerome R. 1971. Scientific knowledge and its social problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
26. Rose, Hilary, and Steven Rose. 1969. Science and society. London. Allen Lane.
27. —, eds. 1976a. The political economy of science: Ideology of/in the natural sciences. London: Macmillan.
28. —, eds. 1976b. The radicalisation of science: Ideology of/in the natural sciences. London: Macmillan.
29. Rose, Steven. 1976. Scientific racism and ideology: The IQ racket from Galton to Jensen. In The political economy ofscience: Ideology of/in the natural sciences, edited by Hilary Rose and Steven Rose, 112–41, 202–06. London : Macmillan.
30. Rowse, Tim. 1986. Sociology pulls its punches. In Science as politics, edited by Les Levido, 139–49. London : Free Association Books.
31. Schwendinger, Herman, and Julia R. Schwendinger. 1974. Sociologists of the chair: A radical analysis of the formative years of North Amencan sociology (1883-1922. New York: Basic Books.
32. Silva, Edward T., and Sheila A. Slaughter. 1984. Serving power: The making of the academic social science expert. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
33. Third World Network. 1988. Modern science in crisis: A Third World response. Penang: Third World Network and Consumers'S Association of Penang.
34. Woolgar, Steve. 1983. Irony in the social study of science. In Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science, edited by Karin D. Knorr-Cetina and Michael Mulkay, 239–66. London : Sage.
35. Young, Robert M. 1969. Malthus and the evolutionists: The common context of biological and social theory. Past & Present 43(May): 109–45.
36. —. 1971. Evolutionary biology and ideology: Then and now. Science Studies 1:177–206.
37. —. 1973. The historiographic and ideological contexts of the nineteenth-century debate on man'S place in nature. In Changing perspectives in the history of science: Essays in honour of Joseph Needham, edited by MikuláÁ Teich and Robert M. Young, 344–438 London: Heinemann.
38. Ziman, John. 1976. The force of knowledge: The scientific dimension of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.