Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views

Medical Physics

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1598-1606

  Gupta, Shalini ^a   Markey, Mia K ^a,b  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Computer assisted; Diagnosis; Image processing; Mammography

Indexed keywords

BIOMINERALIZATION; BONE; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MEDICAL IMAGING; TEXTURES; X RAY SCREENS;

BREAST NEOPLASM; COMPUTER ASSISTED; COMPUTER-AIDED SYSTEMS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CORRELATION VALUE; DETECTION AND DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL DATABASE FOR SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHIES; MEDIOLATERAL OBLIQUES;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHM; BREAST TUMOR; CALCIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST;

EID: 21144458771     PISSN: 00942405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1118/1.1915013     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (60)

1. A. Jemal et al., "Cancer statistics, 2005," Ca-Cancer J. Clin. 55, 10-30 (2005).
2. L. A. G. Ries et al., "SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2000," Bethesda, National Cancer Institute, 2003.
3. L. Tabar et al., "Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality [comment]," Cancer 91, 1724-1731 (2001).
4. L. Tabar et al., "Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening.[comment]," Lancet 361, 1405-1410 (2003).
5. L. L. Humphrey et al., "Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force.[comment][summary for patients in Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 3;137(5 part 1):147; PMID: 12204048]," Ann. Intern Med. 137, 347-360 (2002).
6. R. G. Blanks, M. G. Wallis, and R. M. Given-Wilson, "Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography," J. Med. Screen 6, 152-158 (1999).
7. L. W. Bassett et al., "Breast cancer detection: one versus two views," Radiology 165, 95-97 (1987).
8. K. C. Young et al., "Influence of number of views and mammographic film density on the detection of invasive cancers: results from the NHS Breast Screening Programme," Br. J. Radiol. 70, 482-488 (1997).
9. N. J. Wald et al., "UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening.[comment]," Br. Med. J. 311, 1189-1193 (1995).
10. R. E. Bird, T. W. Wallace, and B. C. Yankaskas, "Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography," Radiology 184, 613-617 (1992).
11. M. G. Wallis, M. T. Walsh, and J. R. Lee, "A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population," Clin. Radiol. 44, 13-15 (1991).
12. J. A. Harvey, L. L. Fajardo, and C. A. Innis, "Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award.[comment]," AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 161, 1167-1172 (1993).
13. D. B. Kopans, "The positive predictive value of mammography," AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 158, 521-526 (1992).
14. A. M. Knutzen and J. J. Gisvold, "Likelihood of malignant disease for various categories of mammographically detected, nonpalpable breast lesions," Mayo Clin. Proc. 68, 454-460 (1993).
15. C. J. Vyborny, M. L. Giger, and R. M. Nishikawa, "Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer," Radiol. Clin. North Am. 38, 725-740 (2000).
16. K. Doi et al., "Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls," Eur. J. Radiol. 31, 97-109 (1999).
17. M. L. Giger, "Computer-aided diagnosis of breast lesions in medical images," Comput. Sci. Eng. 2, 39-45 (2000).
18. M. P. Sampat, M. K. Markey, and A. C. Bovik, in Handbook of Image and Video Processing, edited by A. C. Bovik (Academic, New York, 2005).
19. S. Paquerault et al., "Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information," Med. Phys. 29, 238-247 (2002).
20. Z. Huo, M. L. Giger, and C. J. Vyborny, "Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20, 1285-1292 (2001).
21. H. P. Chan et al., "Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces," Med. Phys. 25, 2007-2019 (1998).
22. W. J. Veldkamp et al., "Automated classification of clustered microcalcifications into malignant and benign types," Med. Phys. 27 (11), 2600-2608 (2000).
23. Y. Jiang et al., "Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification," Radiology 198, 671-678 (1996).
24. C. M. Bishop, Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
25. K. Fukunaga, Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, Boston, 1990).
26. R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork, Pattern Classification, 2nd ed. (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2000).
27. A. Hyvarinen and E. Oja, "Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications," Neural Networks 13, 411-430 (2000).
28. P. G. Tahoces et al., "Computer-assisted diagnosis: the classification of mammographic breast parenchymal patterns," Phys. Med. Biol. 40, 103-117 (1995).
29. Z. Huo et al., "Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers," Radiology 225, (2), 519-526 (2002).
30. J. W. Byng et al., "Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk," Cancer 80, 66-74 (1997).
31. N. Petrick et al., "Combined adaptive enhancement and region-growing segmentation of breast masses on digitized mammograms," Med. Phys. 26, 1642-1654 (1999).
32. A. J. Mendez et al., "Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms," Med. Phys. 25, 957-964 (1998).
33. D. Wei et al., "False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses in digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis," Med. Phys. 24, 903-914 (1997).
34. N. Petrick et al., "Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification," Med. Phys. 23, 1685-1696 (1996).
35. R. Gupta and P. E. Undrill, "The use of texture analysis to delineate suspicious masses in mammography," Phys. Med. Biol. 40, 835-855 (1995).
36. D. Wei et al., "Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: Multiresolution texture analysis," Med. Phys. 22, 1501-1513 (1995).
37. B. Sahiner et al., "Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: A convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 15, 598-610 (1996).
38. H.-P. Chan et al., "Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network," Phys. Med. Biol. 42, 549-567 (1997).
39. T. C. S. S. Andre and R. M. Rangayyan, "Classification of tumors and masses in mammograms using neural networks with shape and texture features," presented at the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Cancun, Mexico, 2003.
40. N. R. Mudigonda, R. M. Rangayyan, and J. E. Desautels, "Gradient and texture analysis for the classification of mammographic masses," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19, 1032-1043 (2000).
41. W. E. Polakowski et al., "Computer-aided breast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of Gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16, 811-819 (1997).
42. B. Sahiner et al., "Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis," Med. Phys. 25, 516-526 (1998).
43. B. Sahiner et al., "Design of a high-sensitivity classifier based on a genetic algorithm: application to computer-aided diagnosis," Phys. Med. Biol. 43, 2853-2871 (1998).
44. L. Hadjiiski et al., "Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses," Med. Phys. 28, 2309-2317 (2001).
45. A. P. Dhawan, Y. Chitre, and C. Kaiser-Bonasso, "Analysis of mammographic microcalcifications using gray-level image structure features," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 15, 246-259 (1996).
46. B. Sahiner et al., "Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation measures and morphological features," Med. Phys. 28, 1455-1465 (2001).
47. N. R. Mudigonda, R. M. Rangayyan, and J. E. Desautels, "Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20, 1215-1227 (2001).
48. D. L. Thiele et al., "Using tissue texture surrounding calcification clusters to predict benign vs malignant outcomes," Med. Phys. 23, 549-555 (1996).
49. Y. Chitre, A. P. Dhawan, and Y. Moskowitz, "Artificial neural network based classification of mammographic microcalcifications using image structure features," Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. 7, 1377-1401 (1993).
50. R. M. Haralick, K. Shanmugam, and I. Dinstein, "Textural features for image classification," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-3, 610-621 (1973).
51. M. Health, K. W. Bowyer, and D. Kopans, in Digital Mammography, edited by N. Karssemeijer, M. Thijssen, and J. H. Hendriks (Kluwer, Academic Dordrecht, 1998), pp. 457-460.
52. M. Health et al., "The digital database for screening mammography," presented at the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Toronto, Canada, 2000.
53. American College of Radiology, Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS™), 3rd ed. (College of Radiology American, Reston, VA, 1998).
54. M. K. Markey, S. Gupta, and P. F. Chyn, "Agreement in BI-RADS™ reporting of lesions in CC and MLO views in the DDSM," presented at the Medical Image Perception Conference X. Durham, NC, 2003 (unpublished).
55. H. P. Chan et al., "Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space," Phys. Med. Biol. 40, 857-876 (1995).
56. B. B. A. Rosner, Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 5th ed. (Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA, 2000).
57. H. P. Chan et al., "Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications," Med, Phys. 21, 1203-1211 (1994).
58. A. Baraldi and F. Parmiggiani, "An investigation of the textural characteristics associated with gray level cooccurrence matrix statistical parameters," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 33, 293-304 (1995).
59. N. Petrick et al., "Breast cancer detection: evaluation of a mass-detection algorithm for computer-aided diagnosis-experience in 263 patients," Radiology 224, 217-224 (2002).
60. G. M. te Brake, N. Karssemeijer, and J. H. Hendriks, "An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from normal tissue in digital mammograms," Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 2843-2857 (2000).