Set-permutation-occurrence matrix based texture segmentation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2652, Issue , 2003, Pages 1099-1107

  Zwiggelaar, Reyer ^a   Blot, Lilian ^a   Raba, David ^b   Denton, Erika R E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

^c NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; STATISTICAL METHODS;

EXPECTATION-MAXIMISATION; MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGES; OCCURRENCE MATRICES; SEGMENTATION RESULTS; SPATIAL INFORMATIONS; STATISTICAL MODELLING; TEXTURE BASED APPROACHES; TEXTURE SEGMENTATION;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 21144451626     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-44871-6_127     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. M. W. Haralick. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proceedings of the IEEE, 67(5):786-804, 1979.
2. R. W. Conners and C. A. Harlow. A theoretical comparison of texture algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2(3):204-222, 1980.
3. A. P. Pentland. Fractal-based description of natural scenes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6(6):661-674, 1984.
4. T. R. Reed and J. M. H. Dubuf. A review of recent texture segmentation and feature-extraction techniques. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 57(3):359-372, 1993.
5. J.N Wolfe. Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer, 37(5):2486-2492, 1976.
6. A. M. Oza and N. F. Boyd. Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk. Epidemiology Review, 15:196-208, 1993.
7. N. Karssemeijer. Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. Phys. Med. Biol, 43:365-378, 1998.
8. th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Bremen, Germany:541-543, 2002.
9. J. W. Byng, M. J. Yaffe, G. A. Lockwood, L. E. Little, D. L. Tritchler, and N. F. Boyd. Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk. Cancer, 80(1):66-74, 1997.
10. J. J. Heine and R. P. Velthuizen. A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection. Medical Physics, 27:2644-2651, 2000.
11. R. Sivaramakrishna, N. A. Obuchowsky, W. A. Chilcote, and K. A. Powell. Automatic segmentation of mammographic density. Academic Radiology, 8(3):250-256, 2001.
12. th British Machine Vision Conference, pages 362-371, Nottingham, UK, 1999.
13. K. Polyak. On the birth of breast cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1552:1-13, 2001.
14. P. Demster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 39:1-38, 1977.
15. P. McKenzie and M. D. Alder. Initialising the em algorithm for use in gaussian mixture modelling. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Practice IV, pages 91-105, 1994.
16. R. Zwiggelaar, T. C. Parr, J. E. Schumm, I. W. Hutt, S. M. Astley, C. J. Taylor, and C. R. M. Boggis. Model-based detection of spiculated lesions in mammograms. Medical Image Analysis, 3(1):39-62, 1999.
17. I. T. Jolliffe. Principal Component Analysis. Springer Verlag, 1986.
18. J. Suckling, J. Parker, D. Dance, S. Astley, I. Hutt, G. Boggis, I. Ricketts, E. Stamatakis, N. Cerneaz, S. Kok, P. Taylor, D. Betal, and J. Savage. The mammographic images analysis society digital mammogram database. In Dance Gale, Astley and Cairns, editors, Digital Mammography, pages 375-378. Elsevier, 1994.
19. th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Bremen, Germany:223-227, 2002.