DF or IDF? On the use of primary feature model for Web information retrieval

Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1012-1020

  Zhang, Min ^a   Ma, Shao Ping ^a   Song, Rui Hua ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Document frequency; Primary feature model; Term weighting; Web information retrieval

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; FEATURE EXTRACTION; INTERNET; PERFORMANCE; TEXT PROCESSING;

DOCUMENT FREQUENCY; PRIMARY FEATURE MODEL; TERM WEIGHTING; WEB INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 21144448936     PISSN: 10009825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1360/jos161012     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Anick PG. Adapting a full-text information retrieval system to computer the troubleshooting domain. In: Croft WB, van Rijsbergen CJ, eds. Proc. of the 17th Annual Int'l ACM-SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'94). ACM Press, 1994. 349-358.
2. Croft WB, Cook R, Wilder D. Providing government information on the Internet: Experience with THOMAS. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int'l Conf. in Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (DL'95). Texas, 1995. 19-24. http://csdl.tamu.edu/DL95/papers/croft/croft.html
3. Stefan K, Armin H, Markus J, Andreas D. Improving document retrieval by automatic query expansion using collaborative learning of term-based concepts. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2423, 2002. 376-387.
4. Zhang M. Study on Web text information retrieval [Ph.D. Thesis]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2003 (in Chinese with English abstract).
5. Moffat A, Davis R, Wilkinson R, Zobel J. Retrieval of partial documents. In: Harman D, ed. Proc. of the 2nd Text Retrieval Conf. (TREC 2). Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication, 1994. 181-191.
6. Srinivasa S, Bhatt PCP. Introduction to Web information retrieval: A user perspective. Journal of Science Education, 2002, 7(6): 27-38.
7. Meng M, Yu C, Liu KL. Building efficient and effective metasearch engines. ACM Computing Surveys, 2002, 34(1): 48-89.
8. Glover E, Tsioutsiouliklis K, Lawrence S, Pennock D, Flake G. Using Web structure for classifying and describing Web pages. In: Proc. of the Int'l World Wide Web Conf. (www 2002). Hawaii: ACM Press, 2002. 562-569. http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/504/index.html
9. Cutler M, Shih Y, Meng W. Using the structure of HTML documents to improve retrieval. In: Proc. of the USENIX Symp. on Internet Technologies and Systems (NISTS'97). 1997. 241-251. http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/usits97/
10. Newby GB. Information space based on HTML structure. In: Vorhees E, ed. Proc. of the 9th Text Retrieval Conf. (TREC 9). Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication, 2000. 601-610.
11. Ricardo BY, Berthier RN. Modern Information Retrieval. New York: Addison-Wesley, ACM Press, 1999. 19-34.
12. Robertson SE, Walker S. Microsoft cambridge at TREC 9: Filtering track. In: Vorhees E, ed. Proc. of the 9th Text Retrieval Conf. (TREC 9). Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication, 2000. 25-33.
13. Bailey P, Craswell N, Hawking D. Engineering a multi-purpose test collection for Web retrieval experiments. Information Proceeding and Management, 2003, 39(6): 853-871.
14. Craswell N, Hawknig D. Overview of the TREC 2002 Web track. In: Vorhees E, ed. Proc. of the 11th Text Retrieval Conf. 2002 (TREC 2002). Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication, 2002. 61-68.