Validation of the care notebook for measuring physical, mental and life well-being of patients with cancer

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1035-1043

  Kobayashi, Kunihiko ^a,b,c   Green, Joseph ^d   Shimonagayoshi, Mari ^a   Kanemoto, Noriaki ^e   Kasai, Ryo ^e   Itoh, Yoichi ^e   Fujiki, Yuki ^b   Ohashi, Yasuo ^e   Gotay, Carolyn ^f   Kudoh, Shoji ^c  

^a SAITAMA CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

^b SAITAMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c NIPPON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^f UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Care Notebook; Life well being; Quality of life; Questionnaire; Subjective well being

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; LIVER CELL CARCINOMA; LUNG CANCER; LYMPHOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; OUTPATIENT; PHARYNX CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SOCIAL STATUS; WELLBEING;

ADULT; AGED; CAREGIVERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE;

EID: 21044451409     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-004-2958-1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. NK Aaronson S Ahmedzai B Bergman 1993 The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality of Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in Oncology J Natl Cancer Inst 85 365 375
2. DF Cella DS Tulsky G Gray 1993 The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure J Clin Oncol 11 570 579
3. M Kurihara H Shimizu K Tsuboi 1999 Development of quality of life questionnaire in Japan: Quality of Life Assessment of Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Psycho Oncol 8 355 363
4. No authors listed Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 66-72 (1999).
5. K Kobayashi F Takeda S Teramukai 1998 A cross-validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for Japanese with lung cancer Eur J Cancer 34 810 815
6. H Fumimoto K Kobayashi CH Chang 2001 Cross-cultural validation of an international questionnaire, the General Measure of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale (FACT-G), for Japanese Qual Life Res 10 701 709
7. T Matsumoto Y Ohashi S Morita 2002 The quality of life questionnaire for cancer patients treated with anticancer drugs (QOL-ACD): Validity and reliability in Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer Qual Life Res 11 483 493
8. PB Jacobsen K Davis D. Cella 2002 Assessing quality of life in research and clinical practice Oncol (Huntingt) 9 Suppl 10 133 139
9. S Greenfield EC. Nelson 1992 Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings Med Care 5 Suppl MS23 MS41
10. RA Deyo DL. Patrick 1989 Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research Med Care. 3 Suppl S254 S268
11. EC Nelson DM. Berwick 1989 The measurement of health status in clinical practice Med Care. 3 (Suppl S77 S90
12. M Andoh K Kobayashi S Kudoh 1997 Using CARE NOTE to measure the level of satisfaction patients feel with their care, in palliative cancer care, as a measure of their quality of life J Nippon Med Sch 64 1 8
13. Bullinger M, Power MJ, Aaronson NK, et al. Creating and evaluating cross-cultural instruments. In: Spilker B. (ed.), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996; 659-668.
14. AH Peterman G Fitchett MJ Brady L Hernandez D. Cella 2002 Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp) Ann Behav Med 24 1 49 58
15. WC Clark JP Kuhl ML Keohan 2003 Factor analysis validates the cluster structure of the dendrogram underlying the Multidimensional Affect and Pain Survey (MAPS) and challenges the a priori classification of the descriptors in the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain 106 357 363
16. RD Hays T Hayashi S. Carson 1988 A users guide for the Multitrait Analysis Program Rand Corporation Santa Monica
17. LJ. Cronbach 1951 Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests Psychometrika. 16 297
18. J Morris D Perez B. McNoe 1998 The use of quality of life data in clinical practice Qual Life Res 7 1 85 91
19. J Wasson A Keller L Rubenstein R Hays E Nelson D. Johnson 1992 Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings The clinician's point of view. The Dartmouth Primary Care COOP Project. Med Care 5 (Suppl MS42 MS49
20. SB Detmar MJ Muller JH Schornagel LD Wever NK. Aaronson 2002 Health-related quality of life assessments and patient-physician communication: A randomized controlled trial JAMA 288 23 3027 3034
21. Ed Diener S Oishi RE. Lucas 2003 Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life Annu Rev Psychol 54 403 425
22. Y Ishihara H Sakai N. Nukariya 1999 A diary form quality of life questionnaire for Japanese patients with lung cancer and summarization techniques for longitudinal assessment Respirology 4 53 61
23. G Velikova L Booth AB Smith PM Brown P Lynch JM Brown PJ. Selby 2004 Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial J Clin Oncol 22 714 724
24. SA McLachlan A Allenby J Matthews A Wirth D Kissane M Bishop J Beresford J. Zalcberg 2001 Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessments versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer J Clin Oncol 19 4117 4125