Controversies on the evolutionary history of pycnodont fishes – reply to Kriwet 2004

Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Earth Sciences

Volumn 95, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 543-546

  Poyato Ariza, Francisco José ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Actinopterygii; additivity; cladistics; Coelodus; Ocloedus; ontogeny; phylogeny; Pycnodontiformes; transformation series

Indexed keywords

FISH; PHYLOGENY;

ACTINOPTERYGII; COELODUS; PISCES; PYCNODONTIFORMES;

EID: 21044447110     PISSN: 02635933     EISSN: 14737116     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0263593300001206     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. De Pinna, M. C. C. 1994. Ontogeny, rooting, and polarity. In Scotland, R. W., Siebert, D. J. & Williams, D. M. (eds) Models in Phylogeny Reconstruction. Systematics Association Special Volume 52, 157–72 Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. Hauser, D. L. & Presch, W. 1991. The effect of ordered characters on phylogenetic reconstruction. Cladistics 7, 243–65.
3. Kitching, I. J., Forey, P. L., Humphries, C. J. & Williams, D. M. 1998. Cladistics: the theory and practice of parsimony analysis, 2nd edn., XIII+228 p. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Kriwet, J. 2004. Dental morphology of the pycnodontid fish †Stemmatodus rhombus (Agassiz 1844) (Neopterygii, †Pycnodontiformes) from the Early Cretaceous with comments on its systematic position. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 94 (for 2003), 145–55.
5. Lipscomb, D. L. 1992. Parsimony, homology and the analysis of multistate characters. Cladistics 8, 45–65.
6. Mabee, P. M. 1989. Assumptions underlying the use of ontogenetic sequences for determining character state order. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 118, 151–8.
7. Mickevich, M. F. & Lipscomb, D. 1991. Parsimony and the choice between different transformations for the same character set. Cladistics 7, 111–39.
8. Nursall, J. R. 1996. The phylogeny of pycnodont fishes. In Arratia, G. & Viohl, G. (eds) Mesozoic Fishes–Systematics and Paleoecology, 125–52. München: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil.
9. Pimentel, R. A. & Riggins, R. 1987. The nature of cladistic data. Cladistics 3, 275–89.
10. Poyato-Ariza, F. J. & Wenz, S. 2002. A new insight into pycnodontiform fishes. Geodiversitas 24(1), 139–248.
11. Poyato-Ariza, F. J. & Wenz, S. 2004. The new pycnodontid fish genus Turbomesodon, and a revision of Macromesodon based on new material from the Early Cretaceous of Las Hoyas, Cuenca, Spain. In Arratia, G. & Tintori, A. (eds) Mesozoic Fishes–Systematics, Paleoenvironment and Biodiversity, 341–78. München: Verlag Dr F. Pfeil.