Edgeworth on complementarity, or edgeworth, Auspitz-Lieben, and Pareto de-homogenized

History of Political Economy

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 293-307

  Weber, Christian E ^a  

^a SEATTLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21044443744     PISSN: 00182702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1215/00182702-37-2-293     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Allen, R. G. D. 1932. The Foundations of a Mathematical Theory of Exchange. Economica, no. 36 (May): 197-226.
2. Allen, R. G. D. 1934a. A Comparison between Different Definitions of Complementary and Competitive Goods. Econometrica 2 (April): 168-75.
3. Allen, R. G. D. 1934b. The Nature of Indifference Curves. Review of Economic Studies 1 (February): 110-21.
4. Antonelli, G. B. [1886] 1971. On the Mathematical Theory of Political Economy. In Preferences, Utility, and Demand, edited by J. S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M. K. Richter, and H. Sonnenschein. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
5. Auspitz, R., and R. Lieben. 1889. Untersuchungen über die Theorie des Preises. Leipzig: Verlag von Dunker und Humblot.
6. Cornes, R. 1992. Duality and Modern Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Edgeworth, F. Y. 1881. Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences. London: Kegan Paul.
8. Edgeworth, F. Y. 1897. La teorio pura del monopolio. Giornale degli economisti, 2nd ser., 15 (July): 13-31; (October): 307-20; (November): 405-14.
9. Edgeworth, F. Y. [1897] 2001. The Pure Theory of Monopoly. In The Foundations of Price Theory, edited by Pascal Bridel. 6 vols. London: Pickering and Chatto.
10. Fisher, I. 1892. Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
11. Harrod, R. F. 1931. The Law of Decreasing Costs. Economic Journal 41 (December): 566-76.
12. Hicks, J. R. 1956. A Revision of Demand Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Hicks, J. R., and R. G. D. Allen. 1934. A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value. Pts. 1 and 2. Economica 1 (February): 52-76; (May): 196-219.
14. Johnson, W. E. 1913. The Pure Theory of Utility Curves. Economic Journal 23.92: 483-513.
15. Lenfant, J.-S. 2003. In Search of Complementarity, Part 1: 1881-1915. Unpublished working paper, Paris I University, presented at the 2003 History of Economics Society meetings.
16. McKenzie, L. W. 1957. Demand Theory without a Utility Index. Review of Economic Studies 24 (June): 185-89.
17. Mosak, J. L. 1944. General-Equilibrium Theory in International Trade. Bloomington, Ind.: Principia.
18. Pareto, V. [1909] 1971. Manual of Political Economy. Translated by A. S. Schwier. New York: Kelley.
19. Roy, René. 1942. De l'utilité: Contribution à la théorie des choix. Paris: Herman.
20. Samuelson, P. A. 1974. Complementarity: An Essay on the 40th Anniversary of the Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory. Journal of Economic Literature 12 (December): 1255-89.
21. Samuelson, P. A. [1947] 1983. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Enlarged ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22. Schmidt, T. 2004. Really Pushing the Envelope: Early Use of the Envelope Theorem by Auspitz and Lieben. HOPE 36.1:103-29.
23. Schneider, E. 1931. Kostentheoretisches zum Monopolproblem. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 3.2:185-211.
24. Schultz, H. 1938. The Theory and Measurement of Demand. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Slutsky, E. E. 1915. Sulla teoria del bilancio del consumatore. Giornale degli economisti 51:1-26.
26. Stigler, G. J. 1950. The Development of Utility Theory. Journal of Political Economy 58 (August): 307-27; (October): 373-96.
27. Viner, J. 1931. Cost Curves and Supply Curves. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 3.1:23-46.
28. Weber, C. E. 2001. Pareto and the 53 Percent Ordinal Theory of Utility. HOPE 33.3:539-74.
29. Weber, C. E. 2003. Slutsky, Introspection, and Auspitz-Lieben-Edgeworth-Pareto Complementarity, or Part of Slutsky's 1915 Paper Was Never Rediscovered. Unpublished working paper, Seattle University, presented at the 2003 History of Economics Society meetings.