Quantitative evaluation of measurement accuracy for three-dimensional angiography system using various phantoms

Radiation Medicine - Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 175-181

  Yamura, Masayuki ^a   Hirai, Toshinori ^a   Korogi, Yukunori ^b   Ikushima, Ichiro ^a   Yamashita, Yasuyuki ^a  

^a KUMAMOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

3D imaging; Angiography; Intracranial artery; Phantom study

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SACCULAR ANEURYSM; STENOSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ARTIFACTS; CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CEREBRAL ARTERIAL DISEASES; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; PHANTOMS, IMAGING;

EID: 21044431505     PISSN: 02882043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Schueler BA, Sen A, Hsiung H-H, Latchaw RE, Hu X. Three-dimensional vascular reconstruction with a clinical X-ray angiography system. Acad Radiol, 4: 693-699, 1997.
2. Heautot JF, Chabert E, Gandon Y, et al. Analysis of cerebrovascular diseases by a new 3-dimensional computerised x-ray angiography system. Neuroradiology, 40: 203-209, 1998.
3. Bidaut LM, Laurent C, Piotin M, et al. Second-generation three-dimensional reconstruction for rotational three-dimensional angiography. Acad Radiol, 5: 836-849, 1998.
4. Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Ducrocq X, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment. Radiology, 218: 799-808, 2001.
5. Abe T, Hirohata M, Tanaka N, et al. Clinical benefits of rotational 3D angiography in endovascular treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 23: 686-688, 2002.
6. Hochmuth A, Spetzger U, Schumacher M. Comparison of three-dimensional rotational angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 23: 1199-1205, 2002.
7. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Nakashima K, Hamatake S, Honda S, Takahashi M. Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 23: 1545-1552, 2002.
8. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Suginohara K, et al. Clinical usefulness of unsubtracted 3D digital angiography compared with rotational digital angiography in the pretreatment evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 24: 1067-1074, 2003.
9. Hein A, Silver MD, Oishi S. Distortion correction table compression for volume X-ray CT applications. Proc SPIE, 3977: 620-631, 2000.
10. Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am, A1: 612-619, 1984.
11. Silver MD, Sen A, Oishi S. Determination and correction of the wobble of a C-arm gantry. Proc SPIE, 3979: 1459-1468, 2000.
12. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Ono K, Yamura M, Uemura S, Yamashita Y. Pseudostenosis phenomenon at volume-rendered three-dimensional digital angiography of intracranial arteries: frequency, location, and effect on image evaluation. Radiology, 232: 882-887, 2004.