Analysis of morphologic patterns of fine-needle aspiration of the breast to reduce false-negative results in breast cytology

Cancer

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 152-157

  Bulgaresi, Paolo ^a   Cariaggi, Maria Paola ^a   Bonardi, Lucia ^a   Carozzi, Maria Francesca ^a   Confortini, Massimo ^a   Galanti, Laura ^a   Maddau, Cristina ^a   Matucci, Marzia ^a   Rubeca, Tiziana ^a   Turco, Patricia ^a   Ciatto, Stefano ^a   Miccinesi, Guido ^a  

^a CANCER RESEARCH AND PREVENTION INSTITUTE ISPO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breast carcinoma; Cytology; Diagnosis; Fine needle aspiration; Morphology

Indexed keywords

APOCRINE CARCINOMA; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; CALCIFICATION; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SIZE; CHROMATIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EPITHELIUM CELL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM STAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODDS RATIO; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECIMEN HANDLING;

EID: 20944446417     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21059     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Pathology in mammography screening - non-operative diagnosis. In: Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, editors. European guidelines for quality assurance in mammographic screening. 3rd edition. Luxembourg: European Commission, 2001:162-172.
2. Ciatto S, Catania S. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of solid masses. In: Catania S, Ciatto S, editors. Breast cytology in clinical practice. London: Martin Dunitz, 1992:75-79.
3. Paci E, Crocetti E, Miccinesi G, et al. Tuscany Cancer Registry. In: Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Teppo L, Thomas DB, editors. Cancer incidence in five continents. Volume VIII. IARC Scientific Pub. No. 155. Lyon, France: IARC Scientific Publications, 2002:362-363.
4. Koss LG. Diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic bases. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999.
5. Cytology Sub-Group of the National Coordinating Committee for Breast Screening Pathology. Guidelines for cytology procedures and reporting in breast cancer screening. NHS-BSP Pub. No. 22. Sheffield, UK: National Health Service Breast Screening Programme, 1992.
6. Zajdela A, Chossein NA, Pillerton JP. The value of aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Cancer. 1975;35:499-506.
7. Brown LA, Coghill SB, Powis SAJ. Audit of diagnostic accuracy of FNA cytology specimens taken by the histopathologist in a symptomatic breast clinic. Cytopathology. 1991;2:1-7.
8. Powles TJ, Trott PA, Cherryman G, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytodiagnosis as a pre-requisite for primary medical treatment of breast cancer. Cytopathology. 1991;2:7-13.
9. Bondeson L, Lindholm K. Aspiration cytology of tubular breast carcinoma. Acta Cytol. 1990;34:15-20.
10. Salhany KE, Page DL. Fine-needle aspiration of mammary lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989;92:22-26.
11. Lamb J, Anderson TJ. Influence of cancer histology on the success of fine needle aspiration of the breast. J Clin Pathol. 1989;42:733-735.
12. Confortini M, Bonardi L, Bulgaresi P, et al. A feasibility study of the use of the AutoPap screening system as a primary screening and location-guided rescreening device. Cancer. 2003;99:129-134.
13. Tench WD. Validation of AutoPap primary screening system sensitivity and high-risk performance. Acta Cytol. 2002;46:296-302.