Regulatory policy regarding distributed generation by utilities: The impact of restructuring

Energy Journal

Volumn 19, Issue SPEC. ISS., 1997, Pages 187-210

  Morse, Jay ^a  

^a SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20944438534     PISSN: 01956574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol18-nosi-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. California PUC (1996). Resolution E-3438 Regarding Southern California Edison Advice Letter No. 1112-E, March 13.
2. California PUC (1997a). Decision D.97-05-040. May 6.
3. California PUC (1997b). Decision D.97-02-014. February 5.
4. Casten, Tom (1995). "Electricity Generation: Smaller is Better." Electricity Journal, December.
5. DRA et al. (1994). Letter to Michael DeAngelis, Chairman, California Photovoltaics for Utilities Collaborative on the Debate in the Collaborative Over Whether to Permit Utility Ownership of Generation at Customer Locations. California PUC's Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA), Toward Utility Rate Normalization and the Utility Consumers Action Network. October 27.
6. Electric Utility Week (1997). July 28.
7. EPRI Journal (1993). "The Vision of Distributed Generation." April/May.
8. Freeman, David (1997). Independent System Operator Phase II Submittal to FERC. March 31.
9. Hogan, William (1997). "A Market Power Model With Strategic Interaction in Electricity Networks." The Energy Journal 18(4): 107-141.
10. JBS Energy Associates (1996). "Photovoltaic Regulatory and Policy Issues." Photo-voltaic [sic] Education Project (PVEP), Photovoltaic Training Manual. National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA). June.
11. Maine (1997). Legislative Decision LD 1804.
12. Massachusetts DPU (1996). Department of Public Utilities Docket 96-100. Final Order, December 31.
13. Morse, Jay (1994). Report on Research, Development and Demonstration. Southern California Edison General Rate Case. Application A.93-12-025. California PUC's Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) Staff Report, Exhibit No. 406. Revised May.
14. Morse, Jay (1996). "The Distributed Generation Utility: A Restructured Perspective" Presented to the Electric Power Research Institute's 2nd Annual Conference on Distributed Resources, Vancouver, B.C., November.
15. New Hampshire HB 1392 (1996). Session Law Chapter 0129, 374-F:3, Section III.
16. New Hampshire PUC (1996). Decision DR 96-150.
17. Nimmons, John D. (1996). "Utility Roles in Distributed Resource Development: Federal Antitrust Laws vs. State Public Utility Laws." Presented to the Electric Power Research Institute's 2nd Annual Conference on Distributed Resources, Vancouver, B.C., November.
18. Nimmons, John D. (1997). "Participation by Rebulated Local Distribution Companies in Distrubuted Resource Development & Deployment." Submitted to California Alliance for Distributed Energy Resources, June.
19. ORA et al. (1997a). Letter to Eric Wong, Chairman, California Alliance for Distributed Energy Resources, Regarding Concerns About Ownership of Distributed Generation by Utilities. California Large Energy Consumers Association, California Manufacturers Association, California Retailers Association, Eastern Pacific Energy, Enron, Independent Power Providers, New Energy Ventures, California PUC's Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), The Utility Reform Network, and Utility Consumers Action Network. April 9.
20. ORA et al. (1997b), Letter to Eric Wong, Chairman, California Alliance for Distributed Energy Resources, Replying to Comments by John Nimmons, J.D. of Nimmons and Associates, and Ronald Ishii, P.E. of Alternative Energy Systems Consulting Regarding Concerns About Ownership of Distributed Generation by Utilities. California Manufacturers Association, California Retailers Association, Enron, Independent Power Providers, New Energy Ventures, California PUC's Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), The Utility Reform Network, and Utility Consumers Action Network. August 26.
21. Pennsylvania PUC (1997). Final Order. Docket No. M-00960890. January 16.
22. Preston, George T. and Daniel M. Rastler, (1996). "Distributed Generation: Competitive Threat or Opportunity?" Public Utilities Fortnightly, August.
23. Robinson, David A. (1996). "Beating the Competition with Interruptible Rates and Standby Generation," Presented to the Electric Power Research Institute's 2nd Annual Conference on Distributed Resources, Vancouver, B.C., November.
24. Smyser, Connie et al. (1995). Strategic Market Assessment of Distributed Resources, Electric Power Research Institute Report No. TR-106055, December.
25. SCE (1993). Photovoltaic Technology and Development Plan. Southern California Edison Company General Rate Case. Application A.93-12-025. Southern California Edison Company, Exhibit 417.
26. SCE (1995). Advice Letter No. 1112-E filed with the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC). July 10.
27. Spratley, William A. (1996). "Legal Tools for Bridging the Consumer PV Dilemna." Photo-voltaic [sic] Education Project (PVEP), Photovoltaic Training Manual. National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA), June.
28. Stoft, Steven (1997). "How Financial Transmission Rights Curb Market Power." UC Energy Institute, June.
29. UPVG (1994). Photovoltaics on the Verge of Commercialization. Utility Photovoltaic Group. June.
30. Wenger, Howard, Tom Hoff and Richard Perez (1992), "Photovoltaics as a Demand-Side Management Option: Benefits of a Utility-Customer Partnership." Presented at the World Energy Engineering Congress, Atlanta, Georgia, October.