The international regulation of intellectual property

Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv

Volumn 134, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 204-207

  Maskus, Keith E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20944433257     PISSN: 00432636     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02708092     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Coe, D. T., E. Helpman, and A. W. Hoffmaister (1997). North-South R&D Spillovers. Economic Journal 107 (January): 134-149.
2. Contractor, F. J. (1980). The Profitability of Technology Licensing by US Multinationals: A Framework for Analysis and an Empirical Study. Journal of International Business Studies 11 (2): 40-63.
3. Davies, H. (1977). Technology Transfer through Commercial Transactions. Journal of Industrial Economics 26 (2): 161-175.
4. Eaton, J., and S. J. Korturn (1996). Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD. Journal of International Economics 40 (3/4): 251-278.
5. Evenson, R. E. (1992). Intellectual Property Rights for Appropriate Invention. In J. A. Roumasset and S. Barr (eds.), The Economics of Cooperation: East Asian Development and the Case for Pro-Market Intervention. Boulder: Westview Press.
6. Ferrantino, M. J. (1993). The Effect of Intellectual Property Rights on International Trade and Investment. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 129 (2): 300-331.
7. Gould, D. M., and W. C. Gruben (1996). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Economic Growth. Journal of Development Economics 48 (2): 323-350.
8. Horstmann, I., and J. R. Markusen (1987). Licensing Versus Direct Investment: A Model of Internalization by the Multinational Enterprise. Canadian Journal of Economics 20 (3): 464-481.
9. Lai, E. J. (1998). International Intellectual Property Rights Protection and the Rate of Product Innovation. Journal of Development Economics 55 (1): 115-130.
10. La Croix, S. (1992). The Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights in Developing Countries. In J. A. Roumasset and S. Barr (eds.), The Economics of Cooperation: East Asian Development and the Case for Pro-Market Intervention. Boulder: Westview Press.
11. Lee, J.-Y., and E. Mansfield, (1996). Intellectual Property Protection and U. S. Foreign Direct Investment. Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (2): 181-186.
12. Levin, R. C., A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson, and S. G. Winter (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3: 783-831.
13. Mansfield, E. (1994). Intellectual Property Protection, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Transfer. Discussion Paper 19. International Finance Corporation, Washingtion, D. C.
14. _ (1995). Innovation, Technology and the Economy: The Selected Essays of Edwin Mansfield, Volume II. London: Edward Elgar.
15. Markusen, J. R. (1995). The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (2): 169-189.
16. Maskus, K. E. (1996). Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Information Economy. In T. J. Courchene (ed.), Policy Frameworks for a Knowledge Economy. Kingston, Ontario: John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy.
17. _ (1997a). Implications of Regional and Multilateral Agreements for Intellectual Property Rights. The World Economy 20 (5): 681-694.
18. _ (1997b). Intellectual Property Rights in Lebanon. Report to the International Trade Division, The World Bank.
19. Maskus, K. E., and D. Eby-Konan (1994). Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights: Issues and Exploratory Results. In A. V. Deardorff and R. M. Stern (eds.), Analytical and Negotiating Issues in the Global Trading System. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
20. Maskus, K. E., and M. Penubarti (1995). How Trade-Related Are Intellectual Property Rights? Journal of International Economics 39 (3/4): 227-248.
21. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1996). Trade and Competition: Frictions after the Uruguay Round. OECD/GD(96)105.
22. Primo Braga, C. A. (1996). Trade-Related Intellectual Property Issues: The Uruguay Round Agreement and Its Economic Implications. In W. Martin and L. A. Winters (eds.), The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Rapp, R. T., and R. P. Rozek (1990). Benefits and Costs of Intellectual Property Protection in Developing Countries. Journal of World Trade 24 (5): 75-102.
24. Reichman, J. H. (1994). Legal Hybrids Between the Patent and Copyright Regimes. Columbia Law Review 94 (8): 2415-2485.
25. Reichman, J. H., and P. Samuelson (1997). Intellectual Property Rights in Data? Vanderbilt Law Review 50 (1): 51-166.
26. Siebeck, W. E. (ed.) (1990). Strengthening Protection of Intellectual Property in Developing Countries: A Survey of the Literature. World Bank Discussion Paper 112. World Bank, Washington D. C.
27. Smith, P. J. (1998). Are Weak Patent Rights a Barrier to U. S. Exports? Journal of International Economics, forthcoming.
28. Stern, R. (1987). Intellectual Property. In M. Finger and J. Olechowski (eds.), The Uruguay Round: A Handbook on the Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.
29. Teece, D. J. (1986). The Multinational Corporation and the Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer. Cambridge: Ballinger.
30. UNCTAD (1996). Economic and Legal Implications for the Developing Countries of Implementing the TRIPS Agreement.Geneva: UNCTAD.